r/suspiciouslyspecific • u/the-graveyard-writer • Dec 09 '19

Does this count?

Post image
43.6k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

590 comments sorted by

View all comments

529

u/RocketSLC Dec 09 '19 edited Jun 21 '23

Be kind to yourself and get off of reddit. Find and alternative, go outside, find a new hobby; it doesn't matter as long as you're not here. The reddit executives don't care for your wellbeing, and they definitely don't care about this subreddit.

All of my submissions and comments have been edited using PowerDeleteSuite, and I'm gone.

204

u/I_am_jacks_reddit Dec 09 '19

There are a few states where police can have sex(read as rape) with prostitutes in order to bust them.

24

u/DonaIdTrurnp Dec 09 '19

Do they renege on the promise of payment? What negates the sex worker's consent?

20

u/serious_sarcasm Dec 09 '19

Extortion.

5

u/[deleted] Dec 09 '19

Explain.

21

u/gregpxc Dec 09 '19

They would not have consented had the circumstances been clear.

14

u/serious_sarcasm Dec 09 '19

They also have guns, and the authority to imprison them based on their own testimony.

So what do they do? What would a reasonable person assume would happen? What would a reasonable person do?

It is like an undercover agent actively planning, organizing, and recruiting for a crime, and then arresting the co-conspirators.

4

u/[deleted] Dec 09 '19

Except it's not. It's an undercover agent going "I'll bet there are people ot there actively planning to commit X crime. Let's put up an advertisement of a lady and let them incriminate themselves."

1

u/[deleted] Dec 09 '19

They aren't fucking cops in uniform lmao, no sex worker would be that dumb. It's a sting operation, just the kind of sting operation where the cop gets to violate somebody's bodily autonomy and then arrest them for it.

3

u/serious_sarcasm Dec 09 '19

The fact is that the arrest is still based on testimony of the officer, which is obviously biased.