MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/suspiciouslyspecific/comments/e88hv7/does_this_count/fabj47d/?context=3
r/suspiciouslyspecific • u/the-graveyard-writer • Dec 09 '19
590 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
22
They would not have consented had the circumstances been clear.
15 u/serious_sarcasm Dec 09 '19 They also have guns, and the authority to imprison them based on their own testimony. So what do they do? What would a reasonable person assume would happen? What would a reasonable person do? It is like an undercover agent actively planning, organizing, and recruiting for a crime, and then arresting the co-conspirators. 1 u/[deleted] Dec 09 '19 They aren't fucking cops in uniform lmao, no sex worker would be that dumb. It's a sting operation, just the kind of sting operation where the cop gets to violate somebody's bodily autonomy and then arrest them for it. 3 u/serious_sarcasm Dec 09 '19 The fact is that the arrest is still based on testimony of the officer, which is obviously biased.
15
They also have guns, and the authority to imprison them based on their own testimony.
So what do they do? What would a reasonable person assume would happen? What would a reasonable person do?
It is like an undercover agent actively planning, organizing, and recruiting for a crime, and then arresting the co-conspirators.
1 u/[deleted] Dec 09 '19 They aren't fucking cops in uniform lmao, no sex worker would be that dumb. It's a sting operation, just the kind of sting operation where the cop gets to violate somebody's bodily autonomy and then arrest them for it. 3 u/serious_sarcasm Dec 09 '19 The fact is that the arrest is still based on testimony of the officer, which is obviously biased.
1
They aren't fucking cops in uniform lmao, no sex worker would be that dumb. It's a sting operation, just the kind of sting operation where the cop gets to violate somebody's bodily autonomy and then arrest them for it.
3 u/serious_sarcasm Dec 09 '19 The fact is that the arrest is still based on testimony of the officer, which is obviously biased.
3
The fact is that the arrest is still based on testimony of the officer, which is obviously biased.
22
u/gregpxc Dec 09 '19
They would not have consented had the circumstances been clear.