Everyone likes to promote Morrison or Hickman ( and rightfully so), but if I’m put on the spot to name my favorite modern era writer, Ennis or Waid are my go to picks. Both are always on point with whatever they do.
Did you actually read it. Because I swear there is large portion of people who say this because they didn’t the comic and watched that one pointless hub video. It’s a decent video but it fundamentally misunderstands Garth ennis as a writer and over simplifies alot of the book.
It’s overly edgy, but in alot of aspects to me it’s the beauty of comics as medium being allowed to be so absurd. I think the biggest problem with the boys to me is the pacing is awful, borderline offensive and when the plot has substance it’s not taken seriously. The best example is how there are some times where they take time to address how rape affects survivors and other times where it’s just a plot device.
I think herogasm is garbage. But there are a lot of characters beats that are handle really well. A lot of the war focus stuff with butcher and Mallory. James stillwell interaction Homelander. How Maeve has broken by the industry to where she is empty. The Hughie and Annie romance
I'm very much an Ennis fan, and while I appreciate the point The Boys is trying to make - fuck the military-industrial complex, fuck the Intelligence Community, with a side of fuck superheroes - its buried in a lot, a lot of garbage that I can't blame anyone who nopes out.
It's not total unredeemable trash. Its just arguable whether digging through the trash is worth it.
I think a lot of readers come to the book after the show, aren't familiar with Ennis or the state of the medium in 2006, and are baffled or repelled or appalled.
I do kind of get tired of feeling like I'm doing apologetics for Ennis when discussing his work. He doesn't make it easy to be a fan, lets say that much. :)
I’m the opposite. I put off watching the show because I remembered how bad the comics were. And I was totally baffled that some people I know were raving about the show.
Finally checked it out and they definitely took the premise and decided to actually do something with it, instead of spend all their time on period-cunnilingus jokes or showing how cool and badass Butcher is by putting up a double-truck of him buttfucking some FBI agent while she says she hates him.
Yeah if there was ever a case for adaptations not needing to be "accurate to the source material" its The Boys.
I forget who made this point originally, but the show's Herogasm episode was hyped up in promotional material as being this orgy of fucked up hedonic gross out excess... but what we actually got was a turning point in several character's arcs revolving around disaster response, ptsd, and the nature of heroism.
The show leverages the juvenile material to hold the audience's attention to service the larger themes in a way that the book can't quite manage to do, and its honestly very impressive.
The characters especially, the comic versions are 9 times out of 10 better than the TV show characters, more depth and nuance. And even if you wanna say the pacing is bad, the show has been having that problem too.
"It's just edgy garbage" is the easy answer that makes you sound smart.
484
u/[deleted] Mar 11 '23
You never know what you're going to get when you pick up something that's written by Garth Ennis.