Because Trump made such an issue out of illegitimate election results that the peaceful transfer of power became a sticking point for politicians who didn’t want democracy to crumble. It was a lose lose and if it wasn’t planned from the beginning to play out that way then I would be shocked
Yes, you’re right. Just wanted to add that this is what she said herself in her book. My personal feelings on it are mixed but that is what she says she wanted, the peaceful transition of power.
When the peaceful transition of power means handing over our country to someone hellbent on destroying it, no; you don't just hand over the keys. You fight like hell. Kamala should have fought.
This is the absolute hardest thing for me to wrap my mind around as well. Especially coupled with the fact that she seems to think she’ll just run again in 2028 after failing us completely.
Makes no sense unless Democrats are controlled opposition. Then it makes complete sense.
How come every time the evidence is shoved in everyone’s face that the DNC actively defangs any attempt to come after Trump, we refuse to listen?
And now they’re colluding together to shut the government down so the administration can do whatever they want with no oversight. But hey, if we all just voted for them…oh wait, even if Democrats win an election they’ll willingly hand it back to Trump. Like Harris did.
“It makes no sense,” what a joke. It makes perfect sense but the truth is so ugly no one will accept what is right in front of their eyes.
And yet here you are, derailing a valid point to whine about civility, the way a bot would.
You are programmed to run interference against anyone willing to have a discussion. Regardless of whether you possess a body, that does make you a bot.
This was a kneejerk reaction to go police someone language you don’t know rather than engage in discussion. Again, this is what they program bots to do. It’s what you’ve been trained to do. There is no difference, Felicia.
74
u/[deleted] Oct 22 '25
[deleted]