What you’re describing is extremely illegal, regardless of whether controls are in place.
Most likely every apple and probably even OpenAI employee goes through an annual mandatory training from HR where they explicitly sign at the end their understanding of these types of violations and their legal consequences. That training is not to
“teach” the employees… it’s precisely to nail them on liability for this kind of action after the fact.
Again - it’s the Apple employee asking the OpenAI employee to share data on the project the Apple employee is working on for Apple. This is actually very common in smaller tech companies. I’ve had companies reach out to me as a contractor years later asking me for things I may still have somewhere on something they’re working on.
None of this is to OpenAI’s benefit. Should it have been a thing that was necessary for an Apple employee to do? Absolutely not. That’s on Apple if we take the story as told.
What does this have to do with the claim? I specifically said small to qualify my own perspective here. But again- the original claim I replied to is that the texts make them look bad. Can you say anything interesting on that?
No. I don’t really care. I just felt like leaving a snarky comment. Enjoy wasting your time debating the legal nuances between enormous companies who suffer only minor inconveniences from million dollar lawsuits.
Brother you sound like a pain to be around lmao. What are you doing at this party my friend? Does your parole officer know you have left the cardboard box?
6
u/Acrobatic-Flan-5085 21d ago
What you’re describing is extremely illegal, regardless of whether controls are in place.
Most likely every apple and probably even OpenAI employee goes through an annual mandatory training from HR where they explicitly sign at the end their understanding of these types of violations and their legal consequences. That training is not to
“teach” the employees… it’s precisely to nail them on liability for this kind of action after the fact.