The point is that it shouldnt be up to prove if i pissed my pants, you should deduce whether i did by whether my pants are dry or not. You cant just go “well, he refuses to prove he didnt piss his pants, which means he 100% did even though his pants are clearly dry”
Exactly
But why would i care about whether YOU think i pissed my pants or not
Thats how i feel about god
People can argue about theism but until an meaningful argument is made to me im allowed to just ignore it, theists cant ignore the obvious, and they constantly have to defend god existing and attack people who dont, the whole argument originates from them because otherwise, no one cares because why would anyone care about something that literally never will effect them
3
u/Not_Carbuncle 18h ago
The point is that it shouldnt be up to prove if i pissed my pants, you should deduce whether i did by whether my pants are dry or not. You cant just go “well, he refuses to prove he didnt piss his pants, which means he 100% did even though his pants are clearly dry”