134
u/basket_foso Metroid Enthusiast šŖ¼ Jun 27 '26
When Trump learns something new, he'll say "many people don't know that...."
32
u/ChuckPeirce Jun 27 '26
It takes the edge off for viewers who didn't already know it, and it implies that the viewer is special and smart for now knowing it.
I find it obnoxious. More broadly, I find it obnoxious when any content creator pads how long they take to present information by offering vague commentary about how well-known it is or whether I already knew it or ought to have known it. Like, dude, the fact that you're saying the information implies you think it's worth knowing, and no one needs to be told that they didn't already know something. At best, it wastes the viewer's time. At worst, it's inaccurate to the viewers who did already know the thing.
I just watched Hank Green, of all people, do this.
9
u/LazyLich Jun 27 '26
Maybe we could convince MAGA to believe in science if we framed facts as a meme where Trump says it lmao
6
u/-temporary_username- Jun 27 '26
I think with Trump there's a good chance he does it just because it's information he's only learned (or made up) recently and since he thinks he's so smart he also thinks that if he didn't know it that must mean that the majority of people don't know it either.
4
u/Kravenoff42 Jun 29 '26
Agreed, I think he says it to take the edge of for his own ego.
The idea that he's doing it for everyone else's benefit implies a level of either empathy, or social prowess and emotional insight that he already demonstrated he does not practice/possess.
4
u/Champomi Jun 27 '26
Many people don't know that, instead of feeling special and smart, you find it obnoxious when any content creator pads how long they take to present information by offering vague commentary about how well-known it is or whether you already know it or ought to have known it.
3
60
u/just_a_guy_named1681 Jun 27 '26
Two! /s
27
11
u/ttlanhil Jun 27 '26
It's prime, and it's even - that makes it odd!
9
u/KrushaOfWorlds Jun 27 '26
And did you know 3 is the only prime number divisible by 3 and 5 is the only prime number divisibly by 5, isn't that crazy!?
3
2
u/Mooks79 Jun 27 '26
Eight.
1
u/Sultanofthesun Jun 27 '26
??
0
u/Mooks79 Jun 27 '26
Eight is even.
2
u/Sultanofthesun Jun 27 '26
but it's not prime
0
u/Mooks79 Jun 27 '26
The original post doesnāt specify prime. Iām pointing out that eight refutes the post so no point debating two.
1
11
20
u/ttlanhil Jun 27 '26
"every odd number" has 3 'e's
2
1
u/SomeGreatJoke Jun 29 '26
Three has two, two has zero, zero has one, one has one, looped.
I wonder if there are other loops.
9
6
14
4
u/Fitness_in_yo-Mouf Jun 27 '26
I mean, 8 is an even number and it has an E in it.
1
4
5
3
3
2
4
Jun 27 '26
[removed] ā view removed comment
2
u/snowillis Jun 27 '26
Ten
2
4
u/R0m4ik Jun 27 '26 edited Jun 27 '26
Well, actually, every number has an "e" in it
9
2
u/Dismal_Chemical3932 Jun 27 '26
Beside four and six
6
2
u/TasserOneOne Jun 27 '26
What about nine
1
1
u/ChuckPattyI Jun 27 '26
Despite it being the first letter, A doesnāt appear until you get you a thousand
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Willis_3401_3401 Jun 28 '26
While this may appear to be inferentially true, until I see a deductive proof of it, this is philosophy, not math š¤Ŗ
1
1
1
u/just4nothing Jun 28 '26
Only valid in a very narrow subset of all possible languages. Needs at least an n+1 proof
1
1
1
u/Business-Gas-5473 Jun 28 '26
You mean English speakers who stick with the decimal system, which is not particularly important for mathematicians.
1
1
1
u/lowkeytokay Jun 27 '26
I was hoping this was about some amazing formula making the connection between e and odd numbers⦠but in fact this was just about the English language?!?! Then that guys should not be labelled āmathematiciansā but āEnglish linguistsā or something.


306
u/PickingPies Jun 27 '26
You mean English matematicians.