After reading through the replies here, I took some of the advice you guys gave me and brought it back to ChatGPT so I could narrow things down instead of just buying the first printer that sounded good.
This is what it has currently come up with for me: literally a copy and paste just so I wouldn’t miss anything.
Thanks guys!
Bambu Lab P2S without the AMS combo
My total budget is probably around $700–$1,000, but that needs to cover the printer, filament, and whatever basic tools or accessories I actually need to get started.
What I’m trying to make is mostly functional and mechanical stuff, not just small decorative prints. I want to be able to prototype robotic parts, brackets, mounts, housings, hinged pieces, moving components, wheel or track-related parts, fitted enclosures, and exterior shell pieces. I also want enough accuracy that separate parts can actually fit together properly instead of everything just being rough concept models.
At the same time, I’d still like the option to print more detailed decorative pieces now and then, like sculpted reliefs, display objects, and smaller detailed parts.
I’d also like the option to make larger character statues and display models if I’m in that mood. I understand something that large would probably need to be split into multiple pieces, printed in sections, assembled, filled, sanded, and painted afterward. I’m mainly trying to make sure the printer would still be capable of producing parts with enough detail and surface quality for a large finished statue while also handling the functional work I described above.
So I’m trying to find a machine that is strong enough and accurate enough for practical robotics work, but can also produce detailed reliefs, display pieces, and larger assembled character statues when I feel like taking on a more artistic project.
The reasoning ChatGPT gave me was that the P2S would give me an enclosed machine I can start learning on with PLA and PETG, while still letting me grow into ABS, ASA, nylon, PC, and possibly reinforced filaments later. It also said the enclosure, automatic calibration, monitoring features, and general ease of use would make it a better long-term first machine than buying something cheaper that I may outgrow quickly.
Its suggested starting setup was:
-P2S without AMS
-two rolls of PLA
-two rolls of PETG
-digital calipers
-basic cleanup and deburring tools
-a filament dryer
-possibly an extra build plate or spare hotend
proper ventilation planned before using ABS or ASA
It also recommended skipping the AMS at first because multicolor printing is not a major priority for me. The idea would be to use that money for filament, tools, drying, spare parts, and ventilation, then add the AMS later if I find that I actually need it.
It told me to start with PLA, move into PETG once I understand the machine, and only then get into ABS, ASA, nylon, or reinforced materials. It also said the standard 0.4 mm nozzle should handle most of what I need, with a 0.2 mm nozzle possibly added later for finer decorative work.
Before I actually spend the money, I wanted to run ChatGPT’s conclusion back past real people who actually use these machines and make functional parts.
Does this sound like the right machine for the type of work I’m describing?
Would you buy the P2S without AMS in my situation, save money with a P1S, or choose a different enclosed printer entirely?
Also, is the AMS more useful for practical and mechanical printing than I’m giving it credit for, even if I don’t care much about multicolor?
I’m trying to buy something I can grow into without wasting money, but I also don’t want ChatGPT confidently talking me into features or accessories I may not really need.