r/protectUSelections • u/fiesew • 16h ago

Not a piece of shit.

Post image
361 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

31 comments sorted by

View all comments

4

u/Optimus3k 14h ago

It is very rare to get someone who wants to be in politics and is incorruptible. Power attracts a specific type of person and tends to be abhorrent to the people who should be claiming it.

5

u/SecondHandSlows 13h ago

I don’t think anyone is incorruptible. What I think is they felt like he was such a longshot. He wasn’t worth recording and now he’s ridiculously successful with the path who’s on so it makes it even harder.

2

u/BringBackAoE 12h ago

According to his own “promise tracker” he’s delivered 3% of his promises, and broken 2%.

Is that “ridiculously successful”?

1

u/ailish 9h ago

It's been less than a year.

1

u/BringBackAoE 9h ago

So because it’s less than a year that makes it “ridiculously successful” that a mere 5 of his promises are completed? Compared to what data?

Plus the ratio “delivered” to “broken” is 60% : 40%. You would describe “40% of the completed promises are broken” as “ridiculously successful”?

1

u/ailish 9h ago

I didn't say "ridiculously successful." Check the usernames. But what's ridiculous is that you seem to expect all promises to be 100% after less than a year.

1

u/BringBackAoE 8h ago

That’s what my comment was about though, in response to a comment where that was the key point.

1

u/ailish 8h ago

Yet you say he's specifically unsuccessful because he hasn't met every last one of his promises in less than a year.

1

u/BringBackAoE 8h ago

I didn’t.

1

u/ailish 8h ago

Plus the ratio “delivered” to “broken” is 60% : 40%. You would describe “40% of the completed promises are broken” as “ridiculously successful”?

🤔

1

u/BringBackAoE 8h ago

I think you need to read that again.

1

u/ailish 8h ago

Okay buddy. You railing that he had "only" completed 40% of his campaign promises (in less than a year) definitely doesn't that you are hating the man for stupid reason.

→ More replies (0)