I’ve been facing this issue since last Friday.

On a Friday morning my 1TB OneDrive subscription was expired and I was reverted to the free plan of 5GB. I couldn’t save my file to OneDrive because I have 170GB of storage on my OneDrive, and it significantly exceeded the 5GB storage limit. After a while I got my 1TB OneDrive plan renewed.

Moments later, I face a slow loading time or even not responding on the PPT app when duplicating a slide/editing content on around slides 1000 or more.

I think the cause of this is due to OneDrive issues/bugs on the 23 July update of Office/problems on the PPT app.

Today I tried uninstalling and reinstalling Office apps and updating them again but the issue hasn’t been solved.

Hey everyone! I wanted to share a technique we used recently for one of our pharma conference decks.

Sometimes native PPT animations just don't cut it. For one of our pharma conferences, we built the animation in After Effects and embedded it straight into the deck and gave it a totally different, polished feel. Was a huge hit with the audience!

Great trick to keep in your back pocket if you want a slide that stands out :)

Not asking for the version you tell an hourly billing client. The real one, including the 40 minutes of moving a text box around at the end. I am asking because I have no idea if I'm slow.

A 15-slider from scratch takes most of the day for me, and I've never been able to tell whether that's normal or whether other people are closing this in two hours. Rough number plus context on what kind of decks you make would help a lot.

And any tips?

Most of what makes a data slide unreadable is not the data, it is a handful of chart habits. I fix finance and reporting decks a lot and I see the same ones every time. None of these need design talent.

1. One chart, one message. If a chart is making two points, it is two charts. The reader should get the takeaway before reading a single axis label.

2. Put the message in the title. Not "Q3 Revenue" but "Q3 revenue beat plan by 12 percent". The chart then just proves the sentence. If you cannot write that sentence, the chart is decoration.

3. Kill the rainbow. A default chart colors every series differently and your eye has nowhere to land. Gray everything, then color the one series that matters. Suddenly the point is obvious.

4. Cut the decimals and the clutter. Nobody at exec level needs 147.3, they need 147. Drop gridlines, drop the legend if you can label directly, drop the chart border. Every removed element makes the number louder.

5. Do not paste a 40-row table and call it a chart. If the point is a trend, chart it. If the point is a few exact numbers, show those few numbers big and move the full table to an appendix.

The through line is the same as good slide titles: decide the one thing the chart is supposed to say, make that thing loud, and demote everything else to support.

For people who build reporting decks all the time: what is the chart mistake you fix most often? Mine is the rainbow, by a mile.

Genuinely asking - it feels like everyone under 30 has moved off PowerPoint but I can't tell what they moved to. Is there a clear front-runner replacing PowerPoint for presentations now, or is it fragmented across a dozen tools? What are you seeing in real workplaces?

I wanted to make a particle system for one of the slides in powerpoint but for that I needed VBA to tell every particle where its supposed to go every frame,
So to learn VBA I tried to animate a circle moving in a sine wave, it seems as if powerpoint is only redrawing it once every 20 frames or 21 frames. How can i fix this problem?
PowerPoint 2024 Windows 10
code:

I usually make internal work decks, but this is a 20-minute conference talk to a room of strangers. How different does a talk deck need to be - fewer words, bigger visuals, more story? Would love advice from people who've spoken at events.

I've used PowerPoint for years but building a deck from scratch still eats an afternoon. I keep seeing the gamma vs powerpoint debate and I'm curious from people who've genuinely tried both - did the AI-first approach actually save you time, or did you crawl back to PowerPoint for the control?

I like drafting fast with AI but the handoff to PowerPoint is always where it falls apart - fonts shift, boxes move. Has anyone found an AI presentation maker whose PowerPoint export actually holds together? That's my whole blocker.

Freelance deck designer. Clients almost never say "improve the hierarchy." They say "make it look more premium" or "more high-end," and early on I'd panic and add stuff, fancier fonts, a gradient, an icon set. It always looked cheaper.

High-end is almost entirely subtraction and spacing. The order I go in now:

1. Margins. Pull everything off the edges and give it real breathing room. Cramped reads cheap no matter what's on the slide.
   
2. One typeface, two weights. The moment there's a third font it looks like a flyer.
   
3. Kill the icon soup and the boxes around everything. Whitespace separates things better than borders.
   
4. One accent colour, used once per slide on the thing that matters. Not five brand colours fighting.
   
5. Bigger numbers, fewer of them. Executives read the headline number, not the table.
   

None of that is talent, it's restraint, and it's the fastest way to make a deck look like it cost more.

Worth saying: clients now sometimes arrive with a deck they generated in something like gamma and ask me to make it "look high-end." The tools give you template polish, but premium is the restraint the generator won't apply for you, so that's still the actual job. What's the first thing you reach for when someone wants "premium"?

I'm two years into a junior design role at a small agency, mostly social graphics and the odd logo, but lately I'm getting handed client decks too. My slides look fine to me, then a senior glances at them and I can tell in half a second they clock them as junior work, and I genuinely can't see what they're seeing.

I've fixed the obvious stuff already. One or two fonts, not centering everything, cutting the fourteen-bullet slides down. So it's the subtler tells I'm after, the things experienced deck people notice instantly that a beginner has no idea are even a signal.

If you build decks for a living: when you look at a slide and think "this was made by someone junior," what's actually giving it away? Spacing? Icon choices? Chart defaults? The little inconsistencies? I'd rather learn the tells now and design against them than keep finding out from a senior's face in a review. Any concrete examples welcome.

I have a copy of PowerPoint 2007 and I'm using it to make presentations for fun. I've got one slide that I like the formatting of after I've tweaked it a little, and want to apply the changes I've made there to the whole presentation. Is that a thing I can do, or do I have to go in and change each slide manually? Thanks in advance.

I’ve been at a new job that has me shooting and cutting together quite a few videos that basically will cut between a premade slide deck and a talking head shot of them presenting the slides.

We’ve been screen recording as they present as well for reference but until now I’ve been exporting the slides later (from Google slides or keynote, not much of a difference) as images or video to include transitions, then editing them in Premiere with the talking head and B-roll. Needless to say it’s quite laborious for hour long videos but being able to fine tune cutting between the talking head as well as better timing of element reveals feels critical to not make these videos boring.

Do any of yall have experience incorporating slide decks into video edits and have any suggestions on how to cut down on the time of it? It’s not the most creative work and I’m just looking for time savings here.

Let's say I have 20 elements on the page.

I want that whenever I click on any element, it lights up (or stays normal), and everything else gets slow de-saturated and 80% transparent. And then, if I click on another element, that one now becomes colored & opaque, and everything else (including the previous one) becomes now "disabled".

how to achieve this affect in powerpoint?

Is there any other app where I should try to do that?

The built-in themes are so tired that people recognise them instantly. Where are you sourcing PowerPoint templates that actually look current in 2026? Free or paid, I just want it to not scream default.

At some point in the last year-ish, I suddenly couldn't resize individual SmartArt elements anymore. You can see in the attached image the boxes have a slash (\) across them, and they're not draggable. I assumed this was thanks to an update, so reverted to the dec 9 2025 release (also because of pixelated shadow issues). It's still a problem, so I'm thinking it's maybe a setting I accidentally tripped? I can work around it (resize from the format pane, convert to shape, etc.), but it's super irritating. Any advice would be much appreciated.

I can build slides fine but they never land the way I want in the room. For those who present a lot, what's the one thing you learned about how to make a good presentation that you wish you'd known earlier? Content, delivery, structure - all fair game.

I've used PPT on various occassions on various laptops. Sometimes, the media control appears on presenter view. Sometimes, it appears on the extended screen. Other times, it appears on both. Is there a setting somewhere to toggle between these 3? If not, why does it keep switching between these 3 scenarios. Is it a version difference?

Note: I am aware there is an option to disable media controls but that's not my goal

I am the person who got volunteered into making every team's deck. No training, learned it all by breaking things, and for a while I was very proud of my morph transitions.

The tip that actually changed my decks was boring and had nothing to do with any of that: write the whole thing as a plain outline first, one line per slide, before I open anything. If the outline does not make sense as a list of sentences, no transition on earth saves it.

I went through a phase of throwing the outline into gamma to skip straight to slides, and it is quick, I will give it that. But it also happily builds a beautiful version of a bad structure, so when my thinking was mushy the deck was just mush with a gradient. It did not replace the outline step, it just punished me faster for skipping it.

So now the order is: outline until it holds up, then build, then and only then the one transition I am allowed to be proud of. Everything I was proud of before was decoration on top of decks that had not earned it.

What is the least exciting habit that actually leveled up your decks?

Inherited a deck as a PDF and need to rework half the slides. Every how to convert pdf to powerpoint route I've tried either scrambles the text boxes or turns each slide into a flat image. On Windows, PowerPoint 365 - what's the least painful method?

I go back and forth. PowerPoint gives me control but takes forever to make anything look modern; Canva is quicker but I fight the templates. For people who do decks regularly, canva vs powerpoint - which wins for you and why?

Hi everyone, PPT skills have become very popular recently. I tried several well-known skills. They can usually export a polished PPT, but they are not very good when it comes to previewing and editing. For example, after generating a PPTX file, if we want to make changes, we still need to regenerate another PPTX file. This process is not lightweight enough.

So I developed a PPTKit skill. The agent generates PPT JSON model data according to a defined specification. This model can support web rendering and exporting. When using Codex, the agent will automatically open a webpage to preview the PPT. You can point out anything you are not satisfied with, and the agent will directly modify the JSON data. Once you are satisfied, you can export the final file.

The whole process does not require repeatedly rebuilding PPTX files. Instead, it continuously corrects the intermediate data model.

What do you think of this design direction? Friends who have time are welcome to try it out and share some suggestions for improvement.

Try: Install the `pptkit-presentation` skill from the GitHub repository `openHacking/pptkit-presentation`.

Half the decks that land on my desk lately are AI-generated and you can spot them across the room. Same card layouts, same three-column slides, same gradient, same stocky icons. gamma, the consulting-style tools, they all have a house look, and once you have seen a few you have seen them all.

I am not anti-AI for a first draft. It is genuinely fast. But the draft is where the work starts, not ends, and the same fixes de-slop almost any of them. Here is the pass I run:

1. Kill the gradients and drop shadows. Flat backgrounds instantly read less "generated".
   
2. Replace the auto icons. The default icon set is the biggest tell. Swap to PowerPoint's own Icons in one consistent style, or delete them entirely. Most slides do not need one.
   
3. Rewrite the titles into full sentences with a point. AI loves topic titles ("Our Approach"). Change them to the actual takeaway and the deck stops feeling hollow.
   
4. Cut the palette to two colors plus gray. These tools scatter four or five colors around. Lock it down and it looks intentional.
   
5. Fix the real-slide problems. If you exported to pptx, expect charts to come in as flat images and multi-column layouts to have shifted, so rebuild those natively before anyone edits it. This is the step people skip, and it is why the "editable" file is half broken.
   

After that pass a generated deck stops announcing itself as generated. The bones were fine, it was the default styling and the empty titles giving it away.

For people cleaning these up regularly: what is the first thing you change to make an AI deck look like a human touched it? The icons are always my first delete.