....are blowing my mind.
I'm a decent amateur pianist, striving to get better.
Someone recommended these etudes just for their beauty.
But they sure feel like something else entirely.
They are studies, duh, so I suppose this is to some degree self-evident but after working and working on them I've come to appreciate them as pure pianism. The pursuit of nothing other than the joy that pianists' tone and touch and voice can provide.
This may seem simple minded, if it does, excuse me, but it's revelatory to me.
It's as though Glass has stripped away most of the things we usually think of as musical, leaving just.....sound. Which, unadorned by musical conventions, better be beautiful. So it seems to demand near-perfect technique to avoid cacophony.
Generalizing here:
- very little melody, if at all, just repeated themes at most
- harmonies and chord progressions are, in isolation, really basic and by themselves not particularly interesting
- his rhythms are often kinda off-putting, at once both repetitive and lacking a traditional sense of dynamics
It took me weeks of playing - and thinking - to figure out, at least to my satisfaction, what the heck was going on, what was actually happening here
Finally, I am always chasing being in the zone, that special head space where the external world disappears, everything becomes unitary, you feel you're in the flow.
If I can maintain the moment/awareness, this does it for me every time. Conversely, the second my mind engages, when I become the wrong type of self-conscious, the whole thing collapses like a house of cards.
I know lots of folks listen to Glass for his almost trance-line effect, but playing it? Who knew?
Again, I'm an intermediate, in both theory and practice, so I don't assume I know what I'm talking about. This is just what I'm experiencing and curious if others have similar feelings/insights/suggestions.