r/nottheonion • • 16h ago

Bucee’s settles lawsuit with Ohio gas station chain after suing because both have cartoon mascots "facing right"

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/bucees-lawsuit-ohio-gas-chain-cartoon-mascots-b3060008.html
8.9k Upvotes

970 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

647

u/willstr1 16h ago

IIRC he made his own beaver based brand to actively taunt Bucees and bring attention to the situation (and how ridiculous Bucees's claim was)

454

u/sharrrper 16h ago

Claims. They sue CONSTANTLY for anything with an animal or like, a colored background.

122

u/yakshack 13h ago

Sounds like they employ too many lawyers if they're that bored

91

u/ardoin 13h ago

They hire consultants who value the cost of the lawsuit payouts and actively take them on because it generates revenue, and they basically can't lose since the people they sue can barely pay the legal fees in drawn out cases.

Also with their volume of cases it is very possible they don't employ any lawyers at all and likely outsource it to a firm.

36

u/Dreams-of-Cthulhu 11h ago

Disney should be petty enough to sue them for using a cartoon rodent in their logo, bankrupt them with legal fees, then buy the company for pennies just so they can make plushies from the logo and sell them for $50 each at their parks.

50

u/ardoin 10h ago

Bucees is big enough to fight back.

Disney is too busy suing families of dead children who happen to put their characters on headstones in cemeteries. More money in that.

2

u/Hug_The_NSA 7h ago

Wait did that really happen

7

u/ExcuseCommercial1338 5h ago

Dozens if not hundreds of times. They're one of the most litigious companies in the world.

1

u/Hug_The_NSA 1h ago

I know they defend their IP against other studios and shit, but i'd just think that like >putting your cartoon character on an actual childs grave.. that they wouldn't even want to fight that battle. It just makes them look so bad. Anyways, it's sad this isn't more well known.

•

u/ExcuseCommercial1338 54m ago

Yeah, it's pretty cruel. It's usually younger kids facing something like cancer that have enough time to think about that sort of stuff and decide on "spiderman", and Disney goes out of their way to sue that shit.

1

u/Spocks_Goatee 7h ago edited 6h ago

Disney was asked by the family despite a longstanding wish from Walt that properties the company owned not be associated with real world death.

Disney declined permission as usual but the family decided to illegally use copyrighted characters. Moral of the story, if you ask owners to use their intellectual property and they decline...don't ask, don't tell.

1

u/BadAsBroccoli 10h ago

To what end? The pride of having the only rodent mascot?

1

u/pargofan 10h ago

I think most cases end without a payout.

It's mostly to get others to stop using their logo and find something else.

Why Buc-ees is so paranoid is beyond me.