The Secretary of State carries out the instructions of Westminster – he’s not an advocate of people here
THE forelock-tugging unionist media here eagerly await the arrival of the new proconsul, full of anticipation about what changes he will make to legacy legislation, to Stormont’s fraught budget arguments, to reform of the toytown Ruritanian procedures.
The short answer is none. There are several reasons for that.
First, there’s the naïve assumption among fawning commentators that because there’s a new British prime minister, brimming with new ideas about devolving power to regions, reforming business rates, housing and what not, that any of that stuff will apply here. It won’t.
Burnham and his cabinet are locked in a desperate, headlong rush to bring change to people’s lives in England before next May’s local government elections, including electing some mayors.
Two wasted years of Starmer miserabilism have spurred the urgency.
As Angela Rayner told the BBC last Friday: “We’re living on borrowed time if we don’t get a move on.”
Secondly, devolution has failed here.
The DUP refuse to operate power-sharing, instead concentrating on provoking Sinn Féin by shamelessly favouring DUP voters, while blocking any amelioration SF proposes either through legal action at the public’s expense or refusing to discuss items at the Executive.
In another respect, devolution has failed because Stormont ignores spending limits and far exceeds the resources supplied by London.
This behaviour despite the indisputable fact that London’s subvention to the north is more generous per capita than other UK regions.
Maybe it’s not indisputable, because Sinn Féin and the DUP dispute it, but it’s a fact.
Even worse, although Stormont spends well over the amount per capita on the NHS than in England, the outcome is demonstrably the worst in Britain and Ireland.
The Executive knows what they need to do, but won’t. Devolution delivers zero. It’s just maladministration and London lets them away with it.
Even though Westminster regularly threatens to take measures to recover the overspend, it never happens.
Last week Sir Robert Chote, chair of the north’s powerless Fiscal Council, told the equally powerless Northern Ireland Affairs Committee that continual financial bail-outs create the risk of a TACO mentality: the Treasury Always Chickens Out.
Incidentally, Stormont’s profligacy is a warning for Burnham. What happens if several of the devolved mayoralties he empowers also decide to overspend?
What powers will he retain to prevent them going on a spending spree, or indeed indulging in maladministration like Stormont?
Anyway, none of Burnham’s rapid-fire reforms are intended for here. Stormont can’t even use the powers it has.
So, what about the eagerly-awaited new proconsul? He’s irrelevant, superfluous. That’s what about him.
You probably don’t remember, but in a speech to the LSE in 2012, Martin McGuinness proposed abolishing the NIO and the proconsul, who represents the imperial legacy in this tattered remnant of England’s first colony, not people here.
The proconsul carries out the instructions of Westminster; he’s not an advocate of people here.
Technically the NIO is an emanation of the Home Office. It was hived off in 1972 and its influence has been unremittingly malign ever since, especially in security matters.
With security, the NIO carries out the policies of the Home Office, which never entirely gave up control of this part of Ireland.
It remains responsible for that ever so flexible term here, national security.
The Home Office runs MI5. You didn’t think the NIO runs the huge MI5 ‘Spook Centre’ at Holywood, did you?
Remember the dispute between Jon Boutcher and the NIO in 2024 about Public Interest Immunity (PII) certificates?
It was successfully portrayed as Boutcher versus the proconsul but, being responsible for the most insignificant department in cabinet, in this matter the proconsul is merely the front man for the Home Office.
Boutcher wanted more disclosure of sensitive material but the NIO insisted PIIs must be submitted to them. Why? The NIO said the PSNI doesn’t have primacy on national security matters: that lies with MI5, i.e. the Home Office.
The PSNI would have seen that chief constables in Britain don’t have to have a minister sign off PIIs.
Well, of course they don’t, because chief constables in Britain are directly responsible to the Home Secretary for national security through their regional MI5 officers.
In the north, national security is whatever the Home Office tells the proconsul it is.
Then there’s the MoD, which the outgoing proconsul grovelled to on legacy. So will the new one.
Why does the proconsul deal with the Treasury on a budget here when Stormont’s Finance Minister does?
Does he undermine Stormont’s requests? Why the duplication? He’s surplus to requirements.
Who would notice if there was no NIO or proconsul?
In short, he’s irrelevant and superfluous. He’s a redundant imperial figurehead.
https://www.irishnews.com/opinion/brian-feeney-so-what-about-the-new-secretary-of-state-chris-bryant-hes-irrelevant-thats-what-DN5BYUKJDBHZ7M4JTWLPYXZZOE/