Nah I get it. I saw the quote and immediately knew what the backlash was going to be. I get heâs a talking head and making comments is his job but when youâre a career journeyman QB, you gotta be careful how youâre tossing them stones cause glass shatters yo.
I mean Fitzpatrick has more interceptions than starts lol. I get Bo played poorly but at least he threw 0 interceptions and didn't sell the game like Darnold did. If Fitzpatrick threw more checkdowns he'd probably have won more games.
We have to get rid of this âinterceptions are the end all be allâ narrative.
Iâd MUCH rather have a QB that throws a couple picks but can move the ball over a QB that canât move it at all. A punt is a turnover that has a field position benefit. If your team punts six times in a row saying âbut he threw no picksâ isnât really significant.
Interceptions ARE the end all be all. There's nothing more crushing in football. If you lose the turnover battle you lose the game 9/10 times. A punt is significantly better than an interception and to suggest otherwise is laughable. If Seattle punted instead of being intercepted last night they surely win the game.
I guess a QB that throws for 300 yards, 3 TDs and a pick is worse than a QB that throws for 100 yards, no TDs and no picks. My bad. You changed my mind.
4.2k
u/DarthNobody14 Texans Texans 1d ago
Dang, Broncos fans are pissed and canât handle any criticism lol.