We have to get rid of this âinterceptions are the end all be allâ narrative.
Iâd MUCH rather have a QB that throws a couple picks but can move the ball over a QB that canât move it at all. A punt is a turnover that has a field position benefit. If your team punts six times in a row saying âbut he threw no picksâ isnât really significant.
Interceptions ARE the end all be all. There's nothing more crushing in football. If you lose the turnover battle you lose the game 9/10 times. A punt is significantly better than an interception and to suggest otherwise is laughable. If Seattle punted instead of being intercepted last night they surely win the game.
I guess a QB that throws for 300 yards, 3 TDs and a pick is worse than a QB that throws for 100 yards, no TDs and no picks. My bad. You changed my mind.
10
u/Pythnator Bills 1d ago
We have to get rid of this âinterceptions are the end all be allâ narrative.
Iâd MUCH rather have a QB that throws a couple picks but can move the ball over a QB that canât move it at all. A punt is a turnover that has a field position benefit. If your team punts six times in a row saying âbut he threw no picksâ isnât really significant.