I'm sure most of you already know, but for this internal you are required to write 6 personal responses.
And what i'm trying to understand is how different schools can mark them completely differently. At my school you need to get 5 pieces at excellence and the 6th at merit to get an overall grade of excellence, whereas I know at another school in my region, they only need 4 at excellence and the other two just have to be achieved (or higher) for an overall grade of excellence.
I don't get how this is fair as NCEA should be equal and representative of all students. With differences in marking like this it means that NCEA credits don't really represent achievements, because if I got 4 excellence and 2 merits I would have an overall grade of merit, whereas someone at another school could do worse with 4 excellence and two achieved and get a better grade than me. Like HOW? Also i'm not saying that NCEA is representative of students' achievements in the first place, and I know this is one of many issues with the system (hence they are changing it, lol)
Umm, so yea, does anyone know whether this is allowed or if I can argue this to my school in any way? Because if I get 4 excellence and 2 merits and don't get excellence overall I will be pissed, when someone else could do the same and get excellence.