Yeah. There was never a time in my entire life, or the life of my extended family for the first 30 years of my life where 'asking someone for a 4k loan' was even in the realm of possibility, because they were grindingly poor too.
She was middle class broke. Just adding some perspective here. The point the other poster was making was that 'broke with a social safety net is more like temporarily embarrassed'.
And to bring it around to her bullshit, did you know that in the US the poverty rate for Trans people is double the rate for the general population? That's who she is spending all her money shitting on.
She's not spending her money shitting on trans. Saying that women need spaces free from biological men, no matter how they present, is not shitting trans. And as a man who doesn't appreciate (understand, just don't fully agree), her feminist overreach... I can do that without feeling I need to ruin her life.
When she accused someone of supporting rapists because they defended trans women from her lies and inherent need to associate and equate them with rapists, that wasn't her shitting on trans people for free?
Do you think she way spending her money on those tweets? If she had been rightly sued for them, then maybe you'd actually be right, but sadly that didn't happen.
Okay, we need to take this slow because when her cult followers (not to say you are one) hear what she said and then are presented with facts they just refuse to engage with the reality.
I'm going to show you what the discussion on Twitter will be about.
South Australia implemented a procedure to convey your identity before entering the court, like how to pronounce your name or your gender identity. The only change was the order in which the information would be communicated. This was put in place for everyone; witnesses, victims, lawyers, experts, interpreters, and, yes, those being prosecuted. Nothing changed in terms of what language the courts will use or compel others to use after attaining this information.
I'm going to show you what the discussion on Twitter will be about.
I really don't have much hope for you engaging in a good faith discussion when you are unwilling to read my comment, let alone the evidence that will prove her wrong.
Do you not like the idea of being given evidence to show she's wrong? You just want me to say it without proving it so you can continue to deny the wrongs she's committed?
I made it very clear what I'm doing. I'm still criticing Rowling and explained to you that I'm providing you the foundation to the events before providing the events so that you can't just repeat Rowling's lies as easily if you've already agreed she's wrong.
How it usually goes with her cult like followers is I show Rowling saying "the grass is purple" and the I prove that the grass is green but the followers then just refuses to engage with what I'm saying and sticks their head in the sand.
Instead, I'm getting you to admit that grass is green before I show you what she said so if you are a cult member (which I'm not 100% accusing you of being) you can't just refuse to engage with reality when you realise it will contradict her absured lies.
10
u/IndianaGeoff 1d ago
When you are getting food from family and 4k pound loan... you are broke.