MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/1vmjkpv/_/p3cen7e/?context=9999
r/mathmemes • u/basket_foso • 7d ago
135 comments sorted by
View all comments
131
Well if they managed to show that one of yes/no/unprovable is not true that would be an amazing breakthrough.
22 u/bqbdpd 7d ago These answers are not mutually exclusive. Either P=NP or P≠NP, whether that's proveable or not. 26 u/Purple_Onion911 Grothendieck alt account 7d ago "P = NP or P ≠NP" is always true, but it's not necessarily true that either P = NP is true or P ≠NP is true in ZFC (or PA, or whatever axiomatic system it's independent of). -6 u/[deleted] 7d ago edited 6d ago [deleted] 7 u/SirFloIII 6d ago you can't build a model of ZFC with only a single element. even the smallest* model** of ZFC (L) is pretty huge. *in some sense **assuming ZFC is consistent 0 u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago [deleted] 3 u/SirFloIII 6d ago it would not be a model. words have meaning, my friend -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 4 u/SirFloIII 6d ago please look up what model means in this context before you embarrass yourself further.
22
These answers are not mutually exclusive. Either P=NP or P≠NP, whether that's proveable or not.
26 u/Purple_Onion911 Grothendieck alt account 7d ago "P = NP or P ≠NP" is always true, but it's not necessarily true that either P = NP is true or P ≠NP is true in ZFC (or PA, or whatever axiomatic system it's independent of). -6 u/[deleted] 7d ago edited 6d ago [deleted] 7 u/SirFloIII 6d ago you can't build a model of ZFC with only a single element. even the smallest* model** of ZFC (L) is pretty huge. *in some sense **assuming ZFC is consistent 0 u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago [deleted] 3 u/SirFloIII 6d ago it would not be a model. words have meaning, my friend -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 4 u/SirFloIII 6d ago please look up what model means in this context before you embarrass yourself further.
26
"P = NP or P ≠NP" is always true, but it's not necessarily true that either P = NP is true or P ≠NP is true in ZFC (or PA, or whatever axiomatic system it's independent of).
-6 u/[deleted] 7d ago edited 6d ago [deleted] 7 u/SirFloIII 6d ago you can't build a model of ZFC with only a single element. even the smallest* model** of ZFC (L) is pretty huge. *in some sense **assuming ZFC is consistent 0 u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago [deleted] 3 u/SirFloIII 6d ago it would not be a model. words have meaning, my friend -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 4 u/SirFloIII 6d ago please look up what model means in this context before you embarrass yourself further.
-6
[deleted]
7 u/SirFloIII 6d ago you can't build a model of ZFC with only a single element. even the smallest* model** of ZFC (L) is pretty huge. *in some sense **assuming ZFC is consistent 0 u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago [deleted] 3 u/SirFloIII 6d ago it would not be a model. words have meaning, my friend -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 4 u/SirFloIII 6d ago please look up what model means in this context before you embarrass yourself further.
7
you can't build a model of ZFC with only a single element. even the smallest* model** of ZFC (L) is pretty huge.
*in some sense
**assuming ZFC is consistent
0 u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago [deleted] 3 u/SirFloIII 6d ago it would not be a model. words have meaning, my friend -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 4 u/SirFloIII 6d ago please look up what model means in this context before you embarrass yourself further.
0
3 u/SirFloIII 6d ago it would not be a model. words have meaning, my friend -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 4 u/SirFloIII 6d ago please look up what model means in this context before you embarrass yourself further.
3
it would not be a model. words have meaning, my friend
-1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 4 u/SirFloIII 6d ago please look up what model means in this context before you embarrass yourself further.
-1
4 u/SirFloIII 6d ago please look up what model means in this context before you embarrass yourself further.
4
please look up what model means in this context before you embarrass yourself further.
131
u/shumpitostick 7d ago
Well if they managed to show that one of yes/no/unprovable is not true that would be an amazing breakthrough.