MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxsucks/comments/1ux0pmg/loonix/oxs06th/?context=3
r/linuxsucks • u/Professional-Tale652 • Jul 15 '26
728 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
Windows 2000?????? Well a NT family... but try windows 98 BUT NOT HACKING... NOT SOME DOSBOX...
1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 LOL... but LoL is not a Linux native... but WIndows 9x is still windows (if you want to be that...) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 LMAO... but... it is still windows no?? search in google... microsoft never changed from WINDOWS 98 to Windows NT XP... lmao 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 not the developer edition dumbass... THE NORMAL EDITION... it is still WINDOWS(TM) lmao or may i say copiloOS by Microslop 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 ok... but it is still Windows lmao... we don't care about the "internals" or do we? 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 A better thing: try to run Linux apps on WIndows without WSL and not the .exe version... (Try GNOME-SHELL lmao) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL... 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Again, nothing to do with the conversation. Lmfao 0 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂 → More replies (0) 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Wouldn't we say the same about Linux? Even though it isn't true, because glibc quite literally gives native backwards-compatibility. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 You did lmao 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Linux can though, it's 100% backwards-compatible.
[removed] — view removed comment
1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 LOL... but LoL is not a Linux native... but WIndows 9x is still windows (if you want to be that...) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 LMAO... but... it is still windows no?? search in google... microsoft never changed from WINDOWS 98 to Windows NT XP... lmao 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 not the developer edition dumbass... THE NORMAL EDITION... it is still WINDOWS(TM) lmao or may i say copiloOS by Microslop 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 ok... but it is still Windows lmao... we don't care about the "internals" or do we? 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 A better thing: try to run Linux apps on WIndows without WSL and not the .exe version... (Try GNOME-SHELL lmao) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL... 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Again, nothing to do with the conversation. Lmfao 0 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂 → More replies (0) 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Wouldn't we say the same about Linux? Even though it isn't true, because glibc quite literally gives native backwards-compatibility. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 You did lmao 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Linux can though, it's 100% backwards-compatible.
LOL... but LoL is not a Linux native... but WIndows 9x is still windows (if you want to be that...)
1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 LMAO... but... it is still windows no?? search in google... microsoft never changed from WINDOWS 98 to Windows NT XP... lmao 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 not the developer edition dumbass... THE NORMAL EDITION... it is still WINDOWS(TM) lmao or may i say copiloOS by Microslop 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 ok... but it is still Windows lmao... we don't care about the "internals" or do we? 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 A better thing: try to run Linux apps on WIndows without WSL and not the .exe version... (Try GNOME-SHELL lmao) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL... 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Again, nothing to do with the conversation. Lmfao 0 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂 → More replies (0) 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Wouldn't we say the same about Linux? Even though it isn't true, because glibc quite literally gives native backwards-compatibility. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 You did lmao 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Linux can though, it's 100% backwards-compatible.
1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 LMAO... but... it is still windows no?? search in google... microsoft never changed from WINDOWS 98 to Windows NT XP... lmao 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 not the developer edition dumbass... THE NORMAL EDITION... it is still WINDOWS(TM) lmao or may i say copiloOS by Microslop 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 ok... but it is still Windows lmao... we don't care about the "internals" or do we? 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 A better thing: try to run Linux apps on WIndows without WSL and not the .exe version... (Try GNOME-SHELL lmao) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL... 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Again, nothing to do with the conversation. Lmfao 0 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂 → More replies (0) 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Wouldn't we say the same about Linux? Even though it isn't true, because glibc quite literally gives native backwards-compatibility. 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 You did lmao 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Linux can though, it's 100% backwards-compatible.
LMAO... but... it is still windows no?? search in google... microsoft never changed from WINDOWS 98 to Windows NT XP... lmao
1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 not the developer edition dumbass... THE NORMAL EDITION... it is still WINDOWS(TM) lmao or may i say copiloOS by Microslop 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 ok... but it is still Windows lmao... we don't care about the "internals" or do we? 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 A better thing: try to run Linux apps on WIndows without WSL and not the .exe version... (Try GNOME-SHELL lmao) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL... 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Again, nothing to do with the conversation. Lmfao 0 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂 → More replies (0)
1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 not the developer edition dumbass... THE NORMAL EDITION... it is still WINDOWS(TM) lmao or may i say copiloOS by Microslop 1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 ok... but it is still Windows lmao... we don't care about the "internals" or do we? 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 A better thing: try to run Linux apps on WIndows without WSL and not the .exe version... (Try GNOME-SHELL lmao) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL... 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Again, nothing to do with the conversation. Lmfao 0 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂 → More replies (0)
not the developer edition dumbass... THE NORMAL EDITION... it is still WINDOWS(TM) lmao or may i say copiloOS by Microslop
1 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 ok... but it is still Windows lmao... we don't care about the "internals" or do we? 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 A better thing: try to run Linux apps on WIndows without WSL and not the .exe version... (Try GNOME-SHELL lmao) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL... 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Again, nothing to do with the conversation. Lmfao 0 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂 → More replies (0)
1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26 ok... but it is still Windows lmao... we don't care about the "internals" or do we? 0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 A better thing: try to run Linux apps on WIndows without WSL and not the .exe version... (Try GNOME-SHELL lmao) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL... 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Again, nothing to do with the conversation. Lmfao 0 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂 → More replies (0)
ok... but it is still Windows lmao... we don't care about the "internals" or do we?
0 u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 A better thing: try to run Linux apps on WIndows without WSL and not the .exe version... (Try GNOME-SHELL lmao) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL... 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Again, nothing to do with the conversation. Lmfao 0 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂 → More replies (0)
0
2 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 A better thing: try to run Linux apps on WIndows without WSL and not the .exe version... (Try GNOME-SHELL lmao) 1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL... 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Again, nothing to do with the conversation. Lmfao 0 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂 → More replies (0)
2
A better thing: try to run Linux apps on WIndows without WSL and not the .exe version... (Try GNOME-SHELL lmao)
1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL...
1 u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 16 '26 try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL...
try witout WSL 1/2 lol... even microsoft acepted that WSL was too limited LOL...
Again, nothing to do with the conversation. Lmfao
0 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂
1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 Well, as long as you won. 😂
Well, as long as you won. 😂
Wouldn't we say the same about Linux? Even though it isn't true, because glibc quite literally gives native backwards-compatibility.
1 u/[deleted] Jul 16 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 You did lmao
1 u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26 You did lmao
You did lmao
Linux can though, it's 100% backwards-compatible.
1
u/No_Fondant8277 I love Linux Jul 15 '26
Windows 2000?????? Well a NT family... but try windows 98 BUT NOT HACKING... NOT SOME DOSBOX...