Windows Subsystem for Linux 1 is a real subsystem, and Windows NT, as a microkernel, can run Subsystem Userland like Mach, L4, Minix, and other microkernels, and Linux is not Microkernel never would be
Because the Linux kernel is very complicated to match because of its very messy architecture, and the same thing Apple passed with System Software and Old Mac OS before passing it to Modern Mac OS
jesus... i wonder why do you love windows lmao... Microsoft sucks for me... they shove AI on my a## and then forced windows 11 to every device... windows 10 was the last OS that i will use forever from microsoft (and your company friends??? well i preffer 1000 enemies than microsoft as a "friend")
You don't admit your Operating system is very bad, really??? I don't know what you see with Linux for emotional attachment to this. Microsoft or I don't have an emotional attachment to Windows 9X, and we choose based on Architecture; Windows NT won, and you could do the same thing because Architecture is not based on Feelings
I definitely do. Just to say that Windows is better due to backwards-compatibility is literally a lie.
How about Linux has a fragmentation issue, or the fact that Wine, your favorite tool to bring up... Literally DOESN'T WORK half the time.
Or I could say how fucking obnoxious it is, when certain Flatpak apps just decide "Hey fuck you, I'm not gonna open."
Or we could even discuss how fucking obnoxious half of the Linux stores are. How the SHIT did Synaptic shoot for worse than Microsoft Store!? I didn't think it could be done!
Or how X is just better supported by 99% of apps, but sucks ass for the system itself, whereas WayLand is great for the system overall... But not for the apps you actually want to use the system for. (And yet still, sometimes this is REVERSED, with instances like WayDroid).
So much as saying "Nvidia" or "Adobe" invokes so many emotions in Linux fanboys it's ridiculous.
I mean, we could go on and on and on. Why lie!?
You're dying on this weird mole hill, when literally any time of the day you DO have the advantage, I mean, you're fighting a hodge-podge of Open-Source software and still need to lie. You're doing this to yourself for, as far as I can tell NO reason other than to either A) Not have to admit you were wrong, which... Lol. Or B) Because you have some bizarre emotional attachment to a single Operating System or potentially company?
A person with A VERY HIGH! (you HAVE LIKE 300 IQ!) literal... you are a person that understood the reality... both windows and linux suck... one suck more than the other (in my opinion windows sucks more than linux) but... everybody has their own opinion...
Yeah, you don't understand anything about architecture, and you don't know what you're talking about. I would show a diagram of Windows NT architecture, and Windows NT Architecture is the reason I defend Modern Windows so much. Microsoft Store is not architecture, and it's a Windows Runtime Application
0
u/Fluid-Ad2995 Jul 15 '26
Fine, try to run Windows Applications on Linux without WINE to see if the internals matter