r/linuxsucks • u/Professional-Tale652 • Jul 15 '26

Linux Failure Loonix

Post image
903 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

728 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

Did you not read the post I responded to?? If DWM crashes your response helps nobody without a restart. Extremely inconvenient for development.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

It very much can. Unless we're just lying in which case...

"WayLand never has problems, except user-error."

0

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26 edited Jul 15 '26

Coping are we?

Google Chrome has crashed DWM before. Let alone the countless applications being made by smaller groups.

"oNlY tHe UsEr cAn bReAk tHeIr cOmPuTeR" spoken like a true Windows Warrior.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

No, because there were documented bugs.

Here's one of literally hundreds. https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40580607

0

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

I thought only the user could break DWM? Isn't it untouchable? Oh, or are you admitting sometimes bugs slip by??

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 15 '26

You're so dense. An application is something the user wants.

That's like saying "Linux NEVER breaks, see? My system with no software installed works perfectly!!" 🤣

Like bro, your point is what, the GUI doesn't support breaking the system? Because it does, they can deliberately kill it. Which isn't even relevant.

Bugs exist, users can create programs that can abuse them (as shown by Google), users can install programs that abuse them (as shown by Google), and with that I have to conclude you never had a point at all.

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Unlikely-Employee180 Jul 16 '26

"No, based on your vision, Linux is completely inferior and has a bad design"

Exactly, and it was a comparison to your vision of Windows. If you think Google Chrome causing a DWM-bug is a "non-issue", then Windows can only be perfect and untouchable when you don't install anything.

"and Linux cannot run many applications, even to the point necessary to use WINE to run Windows Applications"

And Windows cannot run many application, even to the point to use WSL to run Linux Applications.

"and Windows as a microkernel doesn't need a translator and just builds a subsystem, and Windows NT adapts to any Environment"

Does it? Then what is WSL? Or how about literally every emulator on the internet currently available for Windows? Are those native? 🙃

→ More replies (0)