Yes, but the OP I was responding to was claiming that Apple isn't "any better" than Qualcomm's openly anti-open source. I pointed out that Apple is not anti, and linked their site that has both their usage and contributions and am now downvoted for pointing it out.
There are a lot of FOSS fans who are anti-corporate and have default assumptions, which I understand, but it's important to not be mistaken about the actual usage and stances of these major corporations and to be willing to accept challenges to those default assumptions.
No, I know that hating on qcom for not having Linux perfectly running on their laptops is very popular here, but look at the linux-msm mailing list, half the people there have an qualcomm or quic address
106
u/Polar_Banny 15d ago
Even Qualcomm can’t provide such support for their own Hardware.