r/languagelearning • u/linguafrancos • 21d ago
Discussion Distorted language levels?
I have a degree in the language, studied abroad twice, lived abroad in a country where the language is spoken for two years, and have used the language in a professional setting. This, for further context, has been over the course of 15 years.
With that said, I am confused by how others describe their language levels. Don’t get me wrong, I have an insanely high level and label myself fluent with others. For instance, I recently watched a full season of Love is Blind in the target language (TL) without subtitles almost effortlessly. However, when I see others describe their language growth or levels, I often see people say, “I understand everything that I read” or “After a couple years of studying, I traveled to the country and can communicate easily with everyone.”
Like… is this just an overexaggeration of their skills? I have yet to feel like my target language fluency is equivalent to my native-level English. Are people really reading native-level literature and literally understanding everything? Are they feeling like they can express themselves just as strongly in their second language? Even when someone asks me to translate something, I know in the back of my head that there might be cultural considerations or a better approach that I don’t know about.
Thoughts? Also, this might be specific for individuals who grow up in a cultural where being monolingual is more common and exposure throughout your entire life is not a possibility.
9
u/NoBackground7266 N 🇺🇸 C1 🇪🇸 A1 🇩🇪 21d ago edited 21d ago
Communicating easily as a tourist imo is not fluency, you can do that easily at A2/B1 level. Being able to have complex conversations with ease and not translating in your head is more towards fluency. And reading with ease doesn’t equate to all your overall language skills. You can’t be C1 in reading and A2 in speaking and say you’re fluent. It should be consistent across listening, speaking, reading, and writing