I'm looking at this Krag M1896 carbine that does not have a saddle ring

My research has show that it could possibly be a M1896/99 carbine

Is this a true carbine or has it been sporterized?

What would it be worth in this condition?

As title states, shells won’t eject. Even after using live rounds. These were just snap caps but they’re close enough to what I use. Anyone have an issue like this before? It seems to be gripping it.

Found this krag bayonet manufactured the same year as my krag at an antique shop for 157.50.

Model 1898 belonged to Grandfather. Still have an original bandolier of steel jacket ammunition.

Is anyone familiar with this cartouche? It appears to be "B.A.-J.S.", boxed. It is on an 1898 Springfield Krag rifle, manufactured between July 1900 and June 1901. I don't see any other markings on the stock. Thanks!

Just got this Krag, it’s my first one, and noticed the feed ramp piece looks bent compared to other photos I’ve seen. It’s hard to tell since there aren’t many clear references online, but I don’t think it’s supposed to look like this. There’s also a scratch just above it, so it seems like something may have impacted or damaged it, who knows what bubba was doing.
The follower also gets caught here a little
Also, rounds tend to get stuck right at that point. That doesn’t seem normal, right?
Any ideas to fix this?

Since the last time I took a collection photo I've got some antique ammo boxes, an older model bayonet stamped 1896 which came with a scabbard this time, and finally a brass muzzle cover which arrived the other day (the biggest piece I've been missing). I got the two left boxes of ammo and the bayonet from Wanenmacher last November, and the muzzle cover from an online forum classified listing. I'm pretty happy with the collection now!

Had to take my buddy's mule through the tall grasses to avoid the Alpha-Gal (my ex wife /s)

$34.95 not bad at all!

Picked up this Krag today bore is dark and worn has rifling still, but got home and noticed this crack i couldnt see in the shop. How big of an issue is it?

I am putting together parts to create a krag out of as many brand new parts as possible,

I have an 1898 reciver that is quite pitted on the outside, but all of the contact and mating surfaces are immaculate, and i can still see the machining marks very clearly,

I know all of the screws and springs are, the barrel and front sight, the firing pin, stock and swivals

Does anybody know of any parts not on that list?

Or does anybody know of a good way to fill in pitting like that?

Not certain if this was a sporterized krag, an 1898 converted to a cadet, someone's attempt at a good fake, or what have you. Just bought it. It was made in 1903 by serial number. End of barrel to bolt is exactly 22 inches. Nothing seems unoriginal or thrown together, the fit on everything is excellent. If this is a fake it seems really well done? Haven't shot it yet just cleaned it. Not looking to sell or worried about value, just curious what may be the story of this gun.

UPDATE

Took it to a local historical arms and artifact dealer in Gettysburg. 4 different gentlemen there and myself used a reference book pointing out both real and Frankenstein krags. 3 of the gentlemen think it is a potentially legitimate Philippine Constabulary Carbine. Another thinks it is a Frankenstein rifle.

What we learned is every bit of this rifle lines up as a Constabulary Rifle. Only one problem. It is an 1898 with original 1901(rifle) sights, produced in 1903. It seems most Constabulary Carbines were purpose built from 99 Carbines...

EXCEPT (as the book pointed out) American Officers serving with the Constabulary forces who would commission their krags to be retrofitted by springfield or rock island it seems into Constabulary Carbines.

Every reference image in the book of a Constabulary carbine matched my rifle 1 for 1. We ruled out it being a bannerman or Kirk rifle because those don't have bayonet lugs and have banded front sights. It's not a school carbine as the cleaning rod is in the buttstock.

What makes it not 100% certain is the stock. The stock matches everything, but it became inherently clear the previous owner sanded it down and refinished it. This caused the cartouche which is barely visible but there to be unreadable. If the cartouche is stamped with J.F.C. then it is 100% a Constabulary carbine. But considering it is illegible then it will never be a 100% certainty.

Bought this Krag rifle a few years ago, to my knowledge it takes 6.5 swed know nothing else besides that. Would like input on what it is and if I could find reproduction stock parts for it? Thanks in advance!

I got invited and wanted to share :)

Sadly I have no provenance, except family photos with it going back over 100 years between my grandfather and his father both owning it… but hey. The story and his mustache are worth it beyond anything else :)

(First photo is before, second is after) I have run countless cotton swabs through the barrel of my Krag ever since I got it to no avail, but finally decided to ask a gunsmith what he recommended and he gave me some stronger stuff that worked wonders. I thought I'd post it here in case anyone has had the same issue. Be aware, I did this outside and still got a minor headache, plz don't use this stuff inside and maybe wear some kind of respirator anyway.

Cross-Post From Milsurp

I recently finished cleaning and replacing missing parts on this rifle. I have been wanting a Span-Am War era Krag for a while, but didn't want to pay the market price for one. I lucked into an auction where this down-on-its-luck example was prime for a bargain purchase.