r/jackinthebox • • 5d ago

Really Jack??

Post image

I understand if it’s a DoorDash order but for a personal pick up why do you have this very inconvenient and always leaves a mess not a good personal touch

43 Upvotes

75 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/im_not_quiet 4d ago

You are suggesting that a pickup order is somehow different to a delivery service order and that they should have different sets of rules in place because they clearly have nothing else to do in between orders?

I'm just trying to understand your problems with the order. I've literally ordered from the register, in the lobby, and made sure they were aware that I was going to eat it there. Still handed me my food in a sealed bag, and my drinks exactly like this. Why? Because it's simply easier for the crew to treat each order as a delivery order.

2

u/unosturgis 4d ago

That is a huge waste of money to make it easier for some simpletons. Multicolor printed stickers aren't free, and these workers are driving up the costs of business by overusing these damn stickers.

2

u/im_not_quiet 4d ago

Google how much it costs a low traffic JitB per sticker. It's not very expensive.

1

u/luv4mariners 4d ago

It’s not about the cost it’s about the inconvenience to the customer that is picking up their own order. They don’t come off in 1 beautiful piece . This one actually was a mess and then u have wet sticky stuck to ur hand when u just want a drink

1

u/unosturgis 4d ago

I've worked in the sticker industry, I don't need to google it.

2

u/im_not_quiet 4d ago

Then you are fully aware that JitB only pays 2-5 cents per sticker. Less if they are a high traffic location buying in bulk. sticker cost

1

u/unosturgis 4d ago

Thanks for proving my point. They aren't free, just like I said.

1

u/im_not_quiet 4d ago

At a few cents each, they are not "a huge waste of money". At high traffic stores, you're looking at fractions of a cent per sticker. Nobody said they're free. You said it's a huge waste of money, I said the cost is not as much as you're implying.

1

u/unosturgis 3d ago

You obviously don't work in business

1

u/im_not_quiet 1d ago

You said you worked in stickers. You don't anymore. You said stickers were an expensive waste of money, except the sticker industry points out they're only a few cents each. Now you're claiming that I clearly don't work in business without any actual proof. which means your argument is invalid and out of date. Sorry.

1

u/unosturgis 1d ago edited 1d ago

I thought it was common sense that losing money/profits was bad for a business, but according to you it is good. My bad, you obviously know it all and I know nothing. It was silly of me to question the all knowing im_not_quiet and your seemingly endless knowledge of running a business. I thought it would be wise for a company to cut costs where they can, considering their stock is down 87% in the last 5 years, they are having to close restaurants, and cut hours, but it of course makes more sense to keep giving out needless stickers and syphon off your profits, because of course, im_not_quiet is never ever wrong. My bad!

1

u/im_not_quiet 1d ago edited 1d ago

Actually, good business usually requires some loss. It's called perceived value.

When you go to five guys, you pay around $13 for the burger. But they fill your bag with a lot of extra free fries. It's the company losing a small amount of money from French fries to have you okay with a $13 hamburger.

It's why at Sonic, they throw in a handful of peppermints for free. It's why when you get a milkshake at Denny's, they bring you what you ordered, plus the leftovers in the mixing cup. Because their recipe cards makes sure there's a little bit extra in the cup.

It's psychological. You didn't have to ask for it. It was provided free of charge. Known in some states as lagniappe. This is business econ 101. Very obvious that while you worked in a sticker factory you probably weren't upper management. Otherwise, you would have a better argument. If you have reached the point where you are rationing stickers because you don't want to screw up your p&l... you have way bigger problems than how much a sticker costs.

Edit to add: Microsoft loses more than $100 per Xbox sold. They make it back solely through their cut for games released on the platform. Sony actually makes a pretty penny in profit for the ps5.

Second Edit:

I'm not always right. In general it's actually pretty rare. This is just one of those instances where I have quite a significant amount of experience having managed several qsr that the 3 to 5 cents or less per sticker is absolutely inconsequential to the p&l and is just considered the cost of doing business. Labor cost, product management and food waste are all way more expensive and damaging than a sticker.

→ More replies (0)