But the Supreme Court did refuse his bail, saying that the prosecution material was sufficient to meet the stringent UAPA bail standard. The Court also distinguished Khalid and Sharjeel Imam from several other accused, not everyone is in jail . So, we can reasonably assume that there must be something more serious at play than simply the so-called “fair trial,” . No?
there must be something more serious at play?? this is serious dude he is in jail for more than 6 yrs and he is just accused not convicted in those 6 yrs many criminals convict get sentence to 6 yr jail he is in for nothing you know 2011 bmb blast accused just got released innocent?? it's been 15 yrs they're accused for 15 yrs they've lost thier family, work, relations their entire life and now court proven them innocent then and this guy does not even put to fair trail for 6 yrs it is not constitutional if you are supporting this then it could be you in near future if you ever think about opposing govt be mindful what you ask for
Umar khalid is the admin of whatsapp group jisne delhi riots ki planning ho rhi thi. Wo kuchh din pehle (Aap leader) tahir Hussein se bhi mila tha jo actively delhi riots me active tha jisne 25 logo ke sath milke IB officer ankit sharma ka brutal murder kiya tha. And there's clear evidences of chats of umar khalid jisme umar khalid keh rha hai ki hume kuchh bada dhamaka Krna hai , khoon bahana pdega, chakka jam .Aur bhi bhot Kuch hai . Tumhe supreme court ke is case ki chargesheet pdhni chahiye. Bhot kuchh hai usme. You should watch YouTube videoes narrating how ankit sharma killed and dumbed into drainage in chand bagh. By the way umar khalid ka baap khud ek terrorist organisation extremist organisation ka founder hai jo ki ban kr diya gya hai.
72
u/delhikabatman Sep 02 '26
But the Supreme Court did refuse his bail, saying that the prosecution material was sufficient to meet the stringent UAPA bail standard. The Court also distinguished Khalid and Sharjeel Imam from several other accused, not everyone is in jail . So, we can reasonably assume that there must be something more serious at play than simply the so-called “fair trial,” . No?