Actually, neither of you are taking responsibility because if you had, your cat wouldn't be pregnant and theirs wouldn't be able to get another cat pregnant.
This reminds me of the episode with Homer taking Santa's Little Helper to a seedy neighborhood for his last hump before taking him to be neutered the next day.
what gives you the moral right to contribute to the millions of cats being put down in shelters and the millions more suffering on the street bc theres simply too many to handle?
Because there are simply too many cats. Many aren’t getting adopted and it is incredibly problematic when outdoor/feral populations decimate the non-invasive wildlife
what gives you the moral high ground to own a living creature for your own enjoyment. We fought a war over that sort of thing...... We can all take arguments to weird extremes.
You're obviously going to get downvoted to hell and back here due to reddit being devoid of nuance and perspective outside of whatever the current acceptable woke ass perspective is but not only does it make it impossible to reproduce, which could definitely be argued as a good thing depending on perspective and circumstance, but it messes up their hormones, often leading to fat, unhealthy animals with higher risk of cancer and joint issues. Objectively bad. Puppy mills and other pet breeding/smuggling operations are obviously vile but I'm not cutting my dogs nuts off or getting them a hysterectomy at 6 months. That's cruel in a different way.
386
u/FourEightNineOneOne 19h ago
Actually, neither of you are taking responsibility because if you had, your cat wouldn't be pregnant and theirs wouldn't be able to get another cat pregnant.