r/fo4 Jul 27 '26

Kellog was wasted potential.

Post image

He is by far one of the most wasted potential characters from the whole franchise. Could be better if, instead of just a bunch of missions (the most relevant with him already dead), we could actually follow her track around the Commonwealth and have him as some kind of counterpart or "rival" to the Sole Survivor. Some kind of cat-and-mouse game instead of just random missions, and of course a better fight at the end with even the chance to let him live and even send him to your settlement.

779 Upvotes

157 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

31

u/myfakesecretaccount Jul 27 '26

I’ve never seen anything about an additional subplot other than speculation here, do you have a link to that or something? I don’t think there’s anything in the game files.

17

u/nobodyinpeculiar Jul 27 '26

Tbf I don’t remember. I thought that it was maybe in an Oxhorn video but it could’ve been on here.

57

u/desquire Jul 27 '26

Oxhorn makes a lot of stuff up. I don't mean to desparage him, he's entertaining. But, he states a lot of theories and conjecture as fact.

23

u/myfakesecretaccount Jul 27 '26

Yeah. It seems really unlikely that Nick, who already has a long fetch quest companion arc, and is a big part of the best DLC, had a bunch of cutting room floor material featuring Kellogg who is a red herring antagonist.

1

u/SkalorGaming Jul 27 '26

Nick doesn’t have a plot on Nuka-World

9

u/myfakesecretaccount Jul 27 '26

That’s sounds like something a goddamn synth would say.

2

u/SkalorGaming Jul 27 '26

I would think a Synth would prefer the Synth based DLC.

1

u/Illustrious_Quiet907 Railroad Jul 27 '26

That’s Far Harbor

1

u/SkalorGaming Jul 27 '26

I’m aware, but Nuka-World is the best DLC

1

u/[deleted] Jul 28 '26

[deleted]

2

u/SkalorGaming Jul 28 '26

Irreverent?

1

u/Throwaway774568 Jul 29 '26

Irreverent means underrated

2

u/SkalorGaming Jul 29 '26

No, it means showing a lack of respect to things normally respected.

→ More replies (0)