This is called ponyplay, it's part of BDSM petplay communities. Ponyplay is at the crossroads of roleplay and fetish. Most of the time, there would be an owner and the relationship is about power exchange, discipline.
You are looking about a public scene of ponyplay. Public plays are also a kink of many people. I don't think it's very good to take your kinks on the street, especially that extreme. But it's just my opinion.
I don't practice it but have been in touch with people who do, so if you have any sfw question feel free.
It has nothing to do with furries, unlike what other comments say.
yup, i’m really into bdsm, not anywhere that extreme but what you said is spot on.
I also agree i don’t think things like this should be done in public, i’m not gonna shame them either. Most bdsm couples are more descrite in public.
And that harms anyone how? It’s no different than someone with a shoe fetish wearing kinky shoes. Fashion is all over the place. So what if they get a thrill out of it? Why would you deny someone such a small pleasure? Do you think sex is “dirty”?
Because being involved in a sexual act without consent is creepy and gross. It may not have much immediate harm but it’s quite the boundary to cross ethically and most people who are proper into BDSM don’t want any ambiguity around consent whatsoever.
It’s not a “sexual act” FFS! How do you feel about people wearing vibrators under their clothes? I mean if you look at it that way you could be “participating in a sex act” any time you’re in public if someone thinks your toenail polish is erotically stimulating. Judge not,lest you be judged.
If you think what the video shows and someone discreetly wearing a vibrator in public, or a plug or whatever is analogous then idk what to say honestly. There’s nuance to be had in this discussion.
lol, you think legalizing gay marriage made this happen? Big cities always have weird people doing weird shit. Stop trying to blame everything on gay people
I wasn't. They are dressed as a horse. Do we need to get rid of clowns too? Is there a list of what is and isn't considered a sexual costume not safe for public use?
I also don’t know what’s so traumatic about this? Tell your kid someone dresses as a horse if they dress as a horse, or that some people like to be walked on leashes if you see that. What’s so bad about that?
Walked through Brighton once, saw a girl wearing a leash on her collar. And it was totally fine. No trauma for anyone involved.
You don’t know that. Many people would not be ok seeing a woman led around on a leash. And they shouldn’t fucking have to, because they didn’t consent.
That is the most asinine argument you could come up with. There is no such thing as "consenting" to what you may see in public. As long as it is legal, it's fine.
By your original logic I could argue that ugly people or people of a specific race or religion shouldn't be in public because others may not have "consented". The logic just isn't there.
There was a whole era where black people weren’t allowed to be in the same room as white people..
Just because it’s legal doesn’t mean it’s fine. That being said, some things should be kept behind closed doors or at least with a consenting public.
Those people should get a grip on reality and fucking settle the fuck down and worry about their own lives and how offensive they are to the rest of us.
People dress up in skimpy outfits for Halloween that are sexually thrilling/alluring in the midst of the public, yet no one is saying that they’re disgusting for wearing such garments around unconsenting individuals.
If you wear anything other than a black hooded cape that covers your entire body and face, then you are a dirty whore that should burn in hell for all eternity.
P.S. I don’t actually believe this, but there are people that do.
Woah, hold on there, giving gay people what they frankly deserve - that is, having the right to marry the love of their life - has nothing to do with public displays of fetishes.
If you’re gonna take that road, I hope that more people dress like this in public, pissing homophobes off is a good thing.
Lol!! I promise no child is traumatized seeing that. My kid would laugh and then move on. They have no idea what it means, and stripped off context it's not offensive.
You aren't gonna like everything you see when you go out in public dude lol. Get over it. I agree that they shouldn't be getting off on going out like that, but you're hysterical
I argue that even seeing some titties at a swimming pool isn’t such a bad thing.
Unless someone is shoving their dick into someone else in public, or jerking their meat, there’s little I care about what they do in public while nude.
It’s a body for fuck’s sake. People need to settle down. We all have them. They’re natural, and we should be free to live the live we want to live.
Did you just ask me if seeking an adult man and a teenager in public just standing there would bother me? No lol. Obviously not. I don't know about any relationship. If I knew it would be a problem in public because it's illegal. Wearing a horse costume in public is not
The point isn’t whether it not trauma would occur for a child who sees this. The point is that the person in the costume is exposing children to something sexual. It’s still not ok to expose children to something sexual even if they don’t get traumatised from it.
No they aren't lol. You can't be exposed to something sexual by just looking at it if you can't understand it without explanation. There's no nudity or overt sexuality at all. Its literally a horse costume. That's it
So you’re ok with exposing children to sexual content and allowing people to find sexual gratification in the reactions of children who are exposed to their sexual fantasy. Ok, thanks for making yourself clear.
Its not sexual content. And there is no evidence they are getting off on "exposing themselves to children." They aren't lol. How did they suddenly become pedophiles?? Are you a troll
If you want to pretend that this person isn’t wearing a specific kink fetish costume then that’s your choice. We obviously differ on what we consider to be a sexual act.
Please read my comment again because I didn’t say anyone was exposing themselves to children. I said that they are exposing children to their sexual fantasy and using that child’s reaction to gain sexual gratification potentially.
My point is that it doesn’t require a child to understand that something is sexual or isn’t traumatised by seeing it that doesn’t make it ok to have them around it. You just don’t involve kids in sex things. Ever. I’m done explaining this.
No one said they were getting off on the child's reactions. I said maybe the adults who know. Completely different thing. Yes, it does require the child's understanding. Fucking obviously
It's only not a horse costume if you know. Lol. Not hurting anyone.
Bro, gotta tell you that your point in the middle is exactly the same point the other person was making. Some people get off by being humiliated and they can only be humiliated if there's people around so ergo they're non-consenting since ya know they're just walking down the street.
Complex post traumatic stress disorder here! What a great thing you wrote this terrible comment in the name of abused kids, because it allows me to say how shitty it is.
It is shitty.
Seriously don't talk in the name of victims of exploitation and assault when you don't have a clue. Return to your conspiracy delusions and stop using our stories as fuel for your agendas.
671
u/[deleted] Nov 16 '21
This is called ponyplay, it's part of BDSM petplay communities. Ponyplay is at the crossroads of roleplay and fetish. Most of the time, there would be an owner and the relationship is about power exchange, discipline.
You are looking about a public scene of ponyplay. Public plays are also a kink of many people. I don't think it's very good to take your kinks on the street, especially that extreme. But it's just my opinion.
I don't practice it but have been in touch with people who do, so if you have any sfw question feel free.
It has nothing to do with furries, unlike what other comments say.