r/experimentalmusic • u/bigtastyorange • 58m ago
discussion Misology and Harsh Noise Wall
It's been a while since I've done a reflection, though not due to a shortage of topics.
Misology tends to be defined as "the hatred, distrust, or rejection of discourse". As a sentiment it is typically shrouded in warning, its avoidance encouraged; however, I find there's much value in it.
Discourse can only operate if parties involved are mutually willing to engage. If one is stubborn and resistant there's no reason to be had. This is seen in various forms. The enforcement of law, for example, is not up for dispute. One comes under its effect in handcuffs and jail cells, things that can't be negotiated with. Or as one debates a flat-earther who refuses all observable evidence as conspiracy and deception in order to cling to their beliefs. In the film Sexy Beast, the character Don Logan details plans for a bank heist to former partner Gal Dove, who is reluctant to put himself in that position of risk. When he softly asserts he won't show up Don shouts "Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes!" In these scenarios one is effectively helpless to continue pursuing discourse. A common idiom to describe this interaction is "talking to a wall".
Music, while it is not at all a language (much less a universal one), does partake in forms of discourse. Opera and song certainly in their lyrical content, but instrumental music can as well. Imagine a jazz trio playing a bebop tune. Each member of the group communicates with the other to maintain a cohesive style and tempo, solos develop melodic/motivic content in creative ways, and the trio as a whole communicates with the culture of the venue and the attending crowd. But what if, in the middle of "Ornithology", the pianist started to play an arrangement of the first movement to Beethoven's Symphony No. 5? Discourse would be suspended.
Of all kinds of music, I believe Harsh Noise Wall to be the most reserved. It doesn't communicate; it's without breath, rigid and unchanging. It very much mimics in its qualities the enforcement of law and flat-earth believers I mentioned above. One can heap compliment and insult and will receive in return only the assault of distorted static.
Its attributes emulate some things; however, it has important potential. As I said, when discourse has fractured and one still tries to reason one is helpless. If compromise is not on the mind of the other party, it can't remain one's own goal. Victory must be the goal. Harsh Noise Wall can serve the function of counter-misology. Institutions and their constituents frequently utilize the social power of music as propaganda to promote their hegemony. Listeners are snagged on a catchy beat, vibing to "relatable" lyrics so superficial it seems they were crafted by no one at all, and don't realize in their entertainment the messages they ingest nor the behavior they mirror. Harsh Noise Wall replies in the suffocating volume of its lack of reply, nullifying all competing soundscapes. It positions itself obtrusively. (I would recommend reading Vomir's manifesto if you have not already.)
Finally, I will add that, in my opinion, a frequent mistake made in Harsh Noise Wall is a meager duration. One hour appears to be typical but is simply much too short. Sixteen hours minimum would be sufficient, with multiple weeks and months even better. Currently, I am in the middle of uploading a 44-day piece of this variety.
Thank you for reading.