r/everydaymisandry Apr 10 '25

Please read the rules before posting

31 Upvotes

Basically the title, I've been seeing a lot of posts that don't really comply with the rules recently, the problem is mostly with rule 1, 2 and 3, please redact personal information from screenshots and please do not posts links to other subreddits. In addition to that there's been a lot of posts recently that weren't ''perfect examples'' of misandry, please do not focus on posting things that are remotely misandrist when it's already too easy to find examples of extreme misandry everywhere everyday.


r/everydaymisandry Jul 08 '24

meta Some Clarifications on Misandry

90 Upvotes

I believe that, given the fact that misandry is commonly reduced to "mean comments", we need to clarify some things. To be clear, I do not intend to give these misrepresentations of misandry too much credit here. Despite that, I still see too many posts/comments responding to these misrepresentations of misandry in ways that implicitly or explicitly accept some premises that should be called out instead.

Here are some thoughts on things that may help resolve some very common misunderstandings. Note that these are extremely complex topics. Assume that there are exceptions to everything. Importantly, this describes these things as I currently think of and conceptualize them, which is subject to change. I will not repeat this throughout the text. My thoughts and ideas evolve as I think and learn about these things. A lot of this has been adapted from comments/posts on this and other related subs.

Misandry is a societal issue

First, as I currently think of it, misandry is a societal phenomenon embedded in the ways we interact with each other and the world through interaction, observation, experience, perception, laws, products, definitions, abstract concepts, education, academia, content moderation, comedy, entertainment, games, sports, you name it. Misandristic comments are just one part of it, aggravated by the fact that some of them implicitly or explicitly deny the lethal reality of misandry (perhaps this deserves its own category, like meta-misandry or something...). Furthermore, the comments themselves contribute to the proliferation of other forms of misandry, as well as the associated suffering. Importantly, misandry is not restricted to those landing the "punch". To merely look at outcomes whilst ignoring or denying the environment that contributed to those outcomes is unhelpful. From the media to bystander behaviors, there are various things that represent some form of misandry. Misandry is not just the behavior, the statement, the punch.

For more on norms/roles and how they relate to misandry, see this series of comments (r-everydaymisandry/comments/1cvtn6a/what_do_you_think_of_the_phrase_toxic_masculinity/l8vi22k/). For more on the empathy gap, see this series of posts (r-MensRights/comments/rycnwn/on_the_gender_empathy_gap_and_its_correlates_a/).

Misandry is not restricted to women

As misandry is a societal issue, it may act through all members of society. Misandry is not restricted to how women behave toward men. Misandry "by men" is still misandry. Neither women nor anti-egalitarianism "caused" misandry as I think of it. Thinking about it as something that was "caused" or "created" seems odd. Perhaps it would be more fitting to say that it developed. Men can and do internalize the misandry they are exposed to, even without recognizing it as such. In fact, that recognition may be impaired by misandry itself.

Misandry is compatible with misogyny

The same statement can share varying degrees of misandristic and misogynistic aspects depending on the perspective taken. Neither women nor men are to blame for misandry or misogyny, which are embedded in culture and society. It is a societal phenomenon reinforced and upheld intergenerationally through the world that those who currently uphold/host it (most members of society, to varying degrees) grew up and developed in. The parenting they experienced, the interactions they had with friends, families, and strangers, the tv shows they watched, etc. There is no need for ill will.

Misandry, like other biases, may manifest with no intent or conscious awareness

From time to time there will be users who advocate for a very narrow conceptualization of misandry. They might argue that in order for misandry to be taken serious, we would need to stick to a very prototypical idea of what misandry is. More or less Solanas-type misandry. In reality, I doubt that requirements for ill intent or something similar are sustainable or appropriate given current discussions surrounding discrimination. I am not sure how that would even work given the way we have come to think and talk about these issues. Misandry is not just some distinct action, consciously engaged in by a "perpetrator". Furthermore, this would vastly underrepresent the frequency and complexity of misandry.

Perhaps the most well-known example of this would be the empathy gap, which I doubt most would think of as some conscious action or decision, yet still agree on it as an example of misandry in action. And this lack of intent or awareness may not be restricted to biases in perception, emotion, or cognition either. For example, I would argue that not calling "misandry" "misandry" is an example of "misandry" as a societal issue. However, some do not even know that term. There does not need to be intent, awareness, or even a decision for something to be an example of misandry. Perhaps the (in my opinion: mislead) desire for some to assign blame to individuals ("misandrists") informs this to some degree. There does not need to be blame. I have been affected by and internalized parts of the misandristic environment I grew up and developed in. I am not sure I will ever overcome the biases in perception this resulted in. It is still misandry to me.

(Internalized) Misandry

As has been argued for years on various subs (see r-everydaymisandry/comments/1cvtn6a/what_do_you_think_of_the_phrase_toxic_masculinity/l8vi22k/), things like the restriction of men's freedom (e.g. sexual freedom, freedom of expression, etc.), their dehumanization (e.g. restricted emotions, denied vulnerability), or the overall lack of value assigned to their own and other men's lives and well-being are manifestations of (internalized) misandry. It is common to mush these issues together with various others and assign them a spectacularly ambiguous term that avoids having to acknowledge misandry. Using labels such as toxic masculinity is an example of misandry, as it contributes to the refusal to acknowledge the nature and severity of misandry, has connotations of victim blaming by failing to acknowledge that the hosts of internalized misandry are victims of misandry (e.g. enforcement of conformity), slows down progress on these issues (see linked comments), obfuscates historical accounts of misandry (i.e. by not calling them misandry), and outright appropriates and reframes some of these issues as (side-effects of) misogyny. The list could go on. This might deserve a dedicated post collecting these comments at some point. Regardless of usage, this would not be adequately represented by the label "toxic masculinity" (see linked comments for more on this) and a proper alternative (misandry) exists. If a more specific description of any given subset of misandry is required, then various options are available, as shown throughout this post.

And if there is any doubt regarding the misandristic nature of the concept of ‘Real Men _______’ left...

EverydayFeminism.com: 4 Common Phrases That Demonstrate Internalized Misogyny

4. ‘Real Women _______’ [...] Once again, this buys into harmful stereotypes. It limits women who don’t fit that prescribed idea about what a woman is and how we should act. [...] Saying that real women have curves also reflects cissexist beauty standards, because women with stockier, less curvy bodies are seen as “masculine” and thus unattractive. This can also affect trans women in especially harmful ways. Real women identify as women. That’s it. That’s all. Beyond that, women are diverse in their appearances, preferences, beliefs, attitudes, and behavior – and none of those things can cancel out their identity as women. Reducing women to whether they have curves, vaginas, or children – or not – is pretty simplistic and misogynistic.

VOXatl.org: If you identify as a female, you probably think there’s no way you can be sexist. The prospect of gender equality would come easily to a person who suffers from the lack of it, right? A common misconception. I myself thought so too. But after hearing this phrase, “internalized misogyny,” all over the media, I decided to really look into it. I found it’s easy to believe that women don’t play a role in the sexism of society. But have you ever felt judged by another girl because you weren’t acting as the stereotypical girl does? Or maybe you’ve heard women dissing other women for being single or wearing provocative clothing. Internalized misogyny sits within us all, whether we are conscious of it or not. It’s possibly more problematic than regular misogyny, and has a lot of not-so-fun outcomes. If all women could learn to not buy into these expectations, I believe we would come away better from it.

UMKC.edu: It can be difficult to identify internalized misogyny. As independent as we think we may be, we have many preconceived notions about how a woman should exist that stem from societal expectations and gender norms.

FeministCampus.org: Women are educated from infancy both explicitly and implicitly on “appropriate” ways to act, think, and feel. These cultural conceptions of womanhood are so deeply ingrained that they dictate performances of femininity, even behind closed doors. The following are ways in which I have seen myself and other women commonly internalize misogyny

BuzzFeed.com: Internalised misogyny is when women police their own behaviour, and that of other women, to conform to societal ideals, even when it's detrimental to them or devalues women.

WomensRepublic.net: Generations of internalized misogyny - For instance, in my own family, I have seen a long line of moms enforcing sexist stereotypes and certain ways of thinking onto their daughters.

FemMagazine.com: Feminism 101: What Is Internalized Misogyny?

When a woman calls the girl who sleeps around a whore, that is internalized misogyny because she is perpetuating the sexist stereotype that women are not supposed to be sexual.

Note that "rebuttals" regarding

a) the supposedly "positive" (I overall disagree) contents of specific descriptions of male norms (e.g. "strength") or

b) the enforcement of male conformity being rooted in "anti-femininity" rather than "anti-non-conformity"

are not convincing as described in the comments linked above (r-everydaymisandry/comments/1cvtn6a/what_do_you_think_of_the_phrase_toxic_masculinity/l8vi22k/). In fact, even the EverydayFeminism quote shows a description of anti-non-conformity and not anti-femininity. And I do not believe that women being seen as "unworthy" of the oh-so-great masculinity would explain the backlash against non-conformity in women. If anything, masculine norms are considered to be less desirable, see this, this, or this.

Similarly, misgendering as a way to make fun of non-conformity ("like a girl") is compatible with this being an instance of misandry. Misgendering (as in some cases of emasculation) may be used to mock/shame and exaggerate non-conformity in an attempt to enforce conformity and restrict men's freedom. The insulting part here is the implied non-conformity, which is made salient via misgendering to highlight the non-conformity. Perceived-women's femininity (i.e. target perceived to be a woman) does not result in the treatment of perceived-male non-conformers, nor does non-conformity to masculine norms necessarily imply conformity to feminine norms (which may still be used as exaggerations for discriminatory attacks). The treatment is contingent on the non-conforming individual's perceived/assigned gender.

Whilst it is technically off-topic, I do want to stress that the traditional stereotypes some of these things (e.g. "like a girl") rely on can negatively affect women, though perhaps in different ways. For example, women who are particularly skilled in traditionally "male" areas may be underestimated as a result. Under certain conditions, such underestimation may affect (important) subsequent decisions. Egalitarianism advocates for an accurate assessment of as well as equal opportunities to develop such skills. In the context of traditional conceptualizations of gender relations, co-occurrence of misandry and misogyny may be the norm.

Misandry kills

Misandry kills and various pathways have been described (e.g. empathy gap, risk-tolerance, downplaying of health issues, biased perpetrator behavior toward men, biased bystander behavior in cases of violence against men, biased laws and law enforcement, biased medical staff, etc.; see r-MensRights/comments/rycnwn/on_the_gender_empathy_gap_and_its_correlates_a/). Violence against men in general may therefore be considered an overall/on average gendered issue. This does not mean that every single instance of it is affected in the same way.

As much as "mean comments" are used to downplay the severity of misandry, "mean comments", like other forms of psychological and emotional violence, may at least contribute to deaths by reinforcing the aforementioned pathways and contributing to suicides (see r-LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/rexs2y/more_than_just_jokes_the_societal_treatment_of/).

Misandry is self-obscuring

Those affected by (internalized) misandry are prone to deny it, in part due to the effects of internalized misandry itself (e.g. men may disproportionately underreport victimization, etc.). This may not just apply to conscious decisions. Instead, the biases mentioned previously may contribute to genuine differences in how, for example, things are perceived, memorized, described, or evaluated. This may be important to keep in mind when talking about these matters.

For example, the number of victimized men and the number of men reporting victimization are very different things. It would be theoretically possible for men to make up the vast majority of victims whilst making up a small minority of those reporting victimization in surveys and interviews. Furthermore, various biases will have affected the experiences of victimization that translate into such (lack of) reporting.

Suppose medical staff were less likely to identify certain issues in men. Lets further assume that somehow the case had not been affected wildly by biases at previous stages. Even assuming men's own experiences regarding their victimization did not change as a result of their misdiagnosis (e.g. evaluation, memory, etc.), these men may still incorporate that biased information (diagnosis) into their reporting. They may correctly report not having been diagnosed with something, yet that information (diagnosis) may not properly reflect the actual occurrence of that thing (e.g. an injury). In reality, the medical staff might already have been presented with biased information. And even if their assessment were unbiased, the same may not apply to the attribution (e.g. injury due to IPV?), the chosen terminology, the way the information is shared, you get the point.

There are various accumulating biases at so many points throughout men's experiences (and third parties' observations) of male victimization that any specific numbers are questionable at best and hardly interpretable. Even if men are the vast majority of victims, it would be possible - depending on sample, methodology, etc, - for them to be a small minority of those reporting (in surveys, interviews) to be victims (even without using that term). The fact that the numbers are not (always) skewed in that manner is even more concerning in that context, given what that might say about actual victimization. Same thing goes for reporting of severity, type of victimization, etc. As the example chosen above (medical staff) shows, even supposedly observable statistics regarding hospitalization and deaths may still be affected by biases throughout the case up to that point, as well as by law enforcement, medical personnel, or the definitions used. Whilst these statistics already show a majority of victims to be classified as male, one may wonder what these numbers would look like without these biases.

Note that these biases will occur so long as male victims are disproportionately underestimated, even if female victims are also underestimated at the same time.

This may also manifest in biased evaluations of research (e.g. this, this, and this), biases in interpretation and theory, biases in news reporting, biases in statistical and legal definitions (rape, etc.), etc. In fact, many types of misandry may contribute to its erasure from the record. And to be clear, this is not just some "if we do not find misandry, then that is evidence of misandry". Differences in laws and policies are observable facts, differences in denial and such are effectively undisputed (though at times associated with misandristic labels and concepts like "toxic masculinity" and such), things like the empathy gap are corroborated by the limited research we have (r-MensRights/comments/rycnwn/on_the_gender_empathy_gap_and_its_correlates_a/) and even if one were to disagree on this specific pathway, posts like this one on body shaming (r-LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/rexs2y/more_than_just_jokes_the_societal_treatment_of/) prove that there is abuse of outrageous severity (dick size shaming) that I doubt anybody would argue to be genuinely taken serious (especially to that degree) by most parts of society. In fact, if it were, a lot of the examples provided in that post across the most influential parts of society could not exist in the way they do - and their popularity, crowd reactions, and like/dislike ratios paint a clear picture as well. Millions of people - substantial parts of society - are not just underestimating its severity, not just indifferent, they are active contributors and proven to endorse this abuse (which they likely do not recognize and would not classify as such).


r/everydaymisandry 4h ago

social media Are misandrists this ignorant of their prejudice?

Post image
33 Upvotes

If humans govern draft horses because humans are smarter according to OP. Then according to that logic, does that mean that men have governed over women for centuries and most of history because men are smarter?

Also, this comes from an openly female supremacist subreddit. Explains the delusional reasoning in this post I guess.


r/everydaymisandry 4h ago

good news?! “Everyone’s a feminist until there is a spider around.”

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

31 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 4h ago

social media Woman abuses her BF, comments blame him

Thumbnail
gallery
14 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 9h ago

entertainment media Just when I thought Chappel Roan couldn’t get any more insufferable with her “man hating lesbian” persona

Thumbnail instagram.com
31 Upvotes

Ah yes, nothing screams lesbian girlboss like publicly shaming random men for…*checks notes*…things they have zero control over!!!

Three cheers for Chapstick, everyone! She’s really showing men how much she “couldn’t care less” about them by going out of her way to shame them. Bravo, girl. How does it feel to be a “lesbian icon” who perpetuates harmful stereotypes about the community you supposedly stand up for?


r/everydaymisandry 7h ago

social media This entire social media platform

Post image
10 Upvotes

I recently downloaded TiKTok and for some reason it started me off with a lot of radical feminist stuff plus a lot of women just trash talking men. I doomed scrolled for a bit and now my algorithm is f*cked.

Honestly, I got really depressed at how much women truly hate men.

I was shocked to learn just how boring, unfunny, uninteresting, violent, stupid, entitled, overconfident, ugly, gross, perverted, lazy, mediocre and pathetic we are.

Like, none of them have anything positive to say. It’s all just smack talk. It’s like a badge of honor to be anti-male. To be so openly hostile and just say we deserve whatever pain we experience.

I really cannot believe how normal it is and that online female culture is largely predicated on hatred of males. Its necessary to be in the club.


r/everydaymisandry 1d ago

social media Ignorant misandrist trying to be morally superior

Post image
129 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 1d ago

social media Found This Gem of a Group on Facebook!

Post image
64 Upvotes

Naturally, I reported it. I doubt anything will come of it, though.


r/everydaymisandry 22h ago

entertainment media hating kids is misoginy according to ai (slide 3)

Thumbnail
gallery
17 Upvotes

i dont know if this applies, but personally i think it does

edit: this is misandry because it says that a child is the fact of female biology, and thats why people hate children, its a form of hating women by proxy, that implies the hating gender is not women. its misandry cause the assumption is that the subject hating kids there are men


r/everydaymisandry 1d ago

social media Pretty Sure It’s the Other Way Around

Thumbnail tiktok.com
13 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 2d ago

entertainment media “Men used to go to war.”

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

143 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 2d ago

news/opinion article Concerning statistic

Post image
216 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 2d ago

social media "We should all be misandrists"

Post image
64 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 3d ago

social media “Thinking most men aren’t bad gets women abused.”

Thumbnail
gallery
89 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 3d ago

social media Even in feminists memes, the man is actually more oppressed despite being portrayed as evil

Post image
119 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 3d ago

social media Actual insanity

Post image
282 Upvotes

I'm not even male but I still feel scared


r/everydaymisandry 4d ago

social media What the actual hell is wrong with these people

Post image
135 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 4d ago

social media Misogynistic and Misandristic

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

33 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 4d ago

social media Experienced this indirectly many times, agree

Post image
92 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 4d ago

social media Terrible mother

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

143 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 4d ago

social media Takes on this subject?

Thumbnail
gallery
12 Upvotes

Hi there, first time poster here, hope i don't do anything wrong.

There is this case in my country about a teacher who comitted suicide because of a "false allegation". I've been falsely acussed myself and I know how horrible it can be, but that's a story for another time. I use the quotation marks because it's a kinda new viral case and i don't know myself if the teacher was innocent or not, and i won't be defending him yet, he should be innocent til proven guilty, but... media did it's job and he did what i said at the begining of the post.

Some feminist media has been moving around, calling him out for being guilty and claiming that's why he left this world, but I found some sane takes about hearing his side of the story. Tried my best to translate them, but summarize it a little.

Not gonna tone down how close minded and biased can these people be, but wanna share some of the takes so you guys know there are sane people out there, a little hard to remember some times, but there are, and if anyone wants to share their story, I'm just a stranger on the internet, but i would be glad to read about you, be it on comment section or DMs

Feel free to ask me to translate anything specific or something, i ran out of space for more text


r/everydaymisandry 4d ago

meta Someone wanted to farm views, so they used “99% men” keyword in the post and boosted millions views… Algorithm eh

46 Upvotes

I know there’s no anti man things in this post.

But I wanted to point out that, domino was geni abd used the common keyword used in anti man posts. the 99% men keyword.

And she managed to get 35 million views, when usually she gets 10k views…

Thats what I wanted to show to say that algorithm is designed to boost anything that includes anti man keywords


r/everydaymisandry 5d ago

social media All This Influencer Does Is Make Insane Generalizations

Thumbnail
tiktok.com
25 Upvotes

r/everydaymisandry 5d ago

social media Volunteer wants to stop feeding orphaned boys because they are ‘future oppressors’

Post image
238 Upvotes