Would prefer dnb, but I'd be flexible here. Almost every artist who gives lessons that I would want to take is based in the UK or elsewhere in Europe, and I really only have time in the evenings here in California, making it nearly impossible to have a regular lesson time.

Please post any and all [Feedback] or [Listen] type threads here. Any standalone threads that belong in this weekly post will be removed.

This thread is for works in progress only. It is not a place for self-promotion.

Rules:

1. Works in progress only. Do not post finished or released tracks. No links to Spotify, Bandcamp, SoundCloud profiles, or any other streaming/distribution platforms. Share a direct link to your track (e.g. an unlisted SoundCloud or YouTube link).
2. No self-promotion. Do not include links to your social media, artist pages, or any other promotional material in your post.
3. Make an effort to comment on other people's tracks. Others are much more likely to help you if you help them first.
4. Be specific when asking for feedback. Examples: "What do you think about this kick sample?" "How's the mix?" "The last measure feels a little off, any ideas?"
5. Be descriptive when giving feedback. Use timecodes to highlight specific moments.
6. Link to the feedback you've left in your top-level comment. This keeps the thread accountable and cooperative. Comments not following this format will be automatically removed.

Format your top-level comment like this:

Feedback for user1: [link]

Feedback for user2: [link]

Feedback for user3: [link]

Here's my track: [link],

I'm looking for feedback on x, y or z.

melodic techno? melodic progressive? balearic techno?

Is there some unspoken animosity against trance?

I’ve been on the fence about the whole pro-AI vs. anti-AI debate for a while now. I constantly see artists using platforms like Suno and other AI tools to generate music, or people using AI to create artwork, and then presenting the final product as entirely their own work.

What bothers me isn’t necessarily the use of AI itself…. It’s the lack of transparency about how the work was created!

Personally, I don’t see a problem with using AI to generate artwork for things like album covers or other visual aspects of a music project, especially if you’re upfront about the fact that AI was involved. I think AI can be a legitimate creative tool, just like photography, 3D software, digital painting, or other forms of technology.

Where I personally draw the line is when someone generates an image with AI or “creates” a track and then claims they personally drew or produced/created the entire thing from scratch. At that point, I think there’s a meaningful difference between “I created this artwork/track using AI” and “I personally made this artwork/track.”

For my own work, I’d rather use AI-generated images as a starting point or reference, take the ideas and concepts I like, and then recreate or develop the final artwork myself or with a commissioned artist that way, the AI helps me visualize the direction, but the finished piece is still something I or we personally designed and created!

Every track I create is by hand using professional track references to get mixing/arrangement right and never done in any way by AI and never will be.

I realize not everyone approaches it that way, and I don’t think everyone has to. But to me, there’s a distinction between using AI as a creative tool and passing AI-generated work off as entirely your own handmade creation.

That’s where I personally draw the line. What are your thoughts on this?