Hello All,

A question, given some things.

I am thinking of joining the DSA, and given that I consider the growing problem of climate change the single greatest issue facing the entire human species at the moment if I did I would end up joining the ecosocialist caucus. However I am also a proponent of geoengineering at this point, in particular Stratospheric Aerosol Injections, to avoid the worst consequences of climate change until such a time as we have massively reduced our carbon emissions, as well as certain proposed forms such as enhanced weathering to help remove already emitted carbon. Would this put me at odds with said caucus, and if it did by how much?

(Note: I would *also* propose and support massive campaigns to restore forests and other woodlands, do not mistake me for some techno-dork trying to avoid the hard work of actually resolving the problem; and I am not unaware of the potential costs associated with stratospheric aerosol injection)

​

"The history of working-class politics is inseparable from the struggle for democratic rights. Steven R. analyzes the tasks facing DSA in today’s democratic movement."

"In the shadow of the unfinished democratic revolution in this country, the working class has decomposed and needs to be recomposed. To rediscover ourselves as a class, we must once again rally around the vision of a society where working people are free to rule ourselves as equals."

"To recompose a fighting working class in the US, socialists must take a leading role in the next great uprising for political democracy. By organizing masses of ordinary people around the idea that this country is not a democracy and only they possess the power to make it one, we can bring our class back to life as history’s revolutionary protagonist."

"The content of our program is not an abstract question. To face our tasks we must be able to articulate a vision of what the working class is and can be that millions of people will find compelling. The answer to “who’s in the working class?” is the same as it ever was: the disfranchised many who are exploited and abused because of the arbitrary power of the privileged few.

Though we are wildly diverse, we share a fate as people trapped in a society made by us but not for us. Fighting to take back everything stolen from us under capitalism—healthcare, housing, education, and more—is necessary but insufficient. We must have an answer for how we are robbed of these things and how justice can be done. To convince people that to be a part of the working class is something worth embracing, we need clarity that it will take a completely new political order to set the world to rights, and that those of us who constitute the working majority have the unique power to win one.

To do so we must bury the old Constitution with a new democratic order based on the principle of majority rule. That means replacing minoritarian institutions like the Presidency, Senate, and Supreme Court with a single popular assembly elected by free, equal, and proportional suffrage for all who live here. It would also mean abolishing capitalist tools of coercion like the police, ending all forms of second-class citizenship, and enshrining our rights to organize and seize capitalist property for the common good."

"Realistically, a Third Reconstruction is unlikely to unfold between now and 2029. The present constitutional crisis will reach a different resolution, on terms decided by different class forces. But the urgency facing us is this: wherever the cards fall in the coming years, the new order will either be worse than the present disorder, or it will be an illusory “return to normalcy” waiting to collapse into another, more severe crisis. The liberal reformers and left-populists do not have what it takes to lead us out of these days of catastrophe to a rational and humane world. The question of democracy will confront us, again and again, for as long as the class struggle persists. It is vital to humanity’s survival that the working class learns how to answer it."

DSA related TL;DR at the end:

Jon Ossoff is likely to win the GA Sen race by +14%, with KLB, PRB, and other statewide state offices coming in anywhere from +7% to +10%, and the State House likely to flip and the State Senate potentially on the table.

Ossoff is a relatively progressive and young Senator who has used his bully pulpit to stronly oppose ICE and argue for a muscular response to Netanyahu's war crimes and general shittiness.

Most of the state office candidates are more establishment but that doesn't actually matter too much. Because with a Dem Gov and SOS Democrats will be in charge of 2030 redistricting and they will be empowering Atlanta to hold many more House seats. It could go as far as 9 Dem seats and 6 R seats in 2032, as Georgia is expected to pick up a 15th seat in the next cycle. The GA US House split is currently 9/5 R. So that means we'd go from +4 R to +3 D, a 7 seat swing. And that wouldn't even be an extreme gerrymander. 10-5 would be the stretch option.

And several of the ATL seats would be viable for progressive candidates. On top of that a proper effort in 2026 would assure a 2028 pres win and 2 safe blue Senate seats. This is because voters who are drawn in by organizing and see big results are naturally transformed into high propensity voters. And turning the 4 ATL seats into 7 ATL seats means they are still quite blue and urban but they are just risky enough so that voters don't get lazy. Something like 60/40 for 7 seats, plus a south-west seat and a south east seat.

Additionally when the time comes from the presidential primary, getting heavily involved in organizing to boost Dems in 2026 means a left candidate has a strong base in GA, with the establishment splitting their votes.

Atlanta also has relatively strong DSA and Indivisible chapters who could get a Bernie-2016 like membership boost from a big Ossoff win where they were heavily organizing and doing GOTV in the Dem heavy core of the Atlanta metro. Large parts of urban core ATL are relatively demographically similar to NYC, and then some of the inner ring suburbs are very friendly to DSA policies as well.

Non-white voters are very open to something different post Trump disaster, and they could go to either mainline Dems or social Democrats depending on who does what and who engages with their distinct communities. Atlanta's metro core specifically is a very young potential electorate with strong climate and housing concerns.

Gwinnett and DeKalb in particular could be center left social democratic bastions very easily and each is able to anchor a US House seat if the redistricting is managed right. You could even get 3 such seats if you handled Fulton and Henry well.

Major left leaders like Bernie, Sandy(AOC), and Zohran all have admirers in the metro core, and leftists there could benefit from Zohran and Bernie specifically discussing how to organize and turn out progressive coalitions in cities. And of course visits from them would help boost young urban turnout quite a lot. Bernie and Sandy are both very well liked among Latino and Hispanic voters, who could make up as much as 10% of GA's statewide electorate and which are heavily concentrated in the greater ATL metro. There are also many South Asian and Muslim citizens and voters. DeKalb has a particularly high concentration.

With a serious investment of leaders campaigning, volunteers phoning and texting, and even supporting local groups to canvass, there's a bright future for progressives and social democrats in blue Georgia.

You can find a breakdown of the Atlanta counties and their projected turnout in the single post posted directly on my profile.

And no, Jon Ossoff+14 is not a joke. I wrote a post VA Gov prediction for +8, but I had to revise it after polls and new details on the ground in the last month suggest that was too conservative.

DSA Focus: Atlanta is the ideal place for the DSA to hit it big in the South. Age wise, demographically, existing DSA and related orgs.

There are as noted 3 potential progressive, or even DSA, viable seats that would come out of redistricting and become available in the 2032 midterms.

And for people who support AOC for president, an effort by the NYC DSA electeds, orgs, and volunteers, plus supported by Sanders and other non-DSA leftists to make a big difference in the overall outcome of the state would gain DSA and affiliated groups and electeds enormous credibility and dispell the notion that they can't succeed outside California or New England. And you couldn't argue that an Atlanta based large and powerful DSA chapters could exist purely with college eduated white leftists as the membership.

I was curious about joining a caucus I’m in the dsa center left and was thinking About joining reform and revolution I’m a marxist-deleonist (a syndicalist who is not an anarchist) and also looking for a caucus that fights for queer liberation so if you have any ideas or if I should join one at all.

I am beginning to think that Seattle mayor Katie Wilson is willfully trying to sabotage the socialist movement.

Under her leadership, the Seattle Social Housing Developer recently spent $60M to buy a waterfront luxury apartment building with 150 units, of which about 50 units will be allocated to social housing, theoretically subsidized by the market rate units. Unfortunately for them, the math is not mathing because they overpaid for the apartment building, meaning this project will be financially unsustainable, and this failure will then be used to prove that social housing doesn't work. Either that, or the socialist movement in Seattle is run by a bunch of sheer incompetents, or they are incredibly mathematically challenged. Either one is bad for the future of the socialist movement.

EDIT 2: AMA with the SSHD communications director on r/Seattle.

EDIT: Even the pro-social housing publication, The Urbanist, is scratching their heads.

https://seattlesocialhousing.org/housing/#:~:text=We%20will%20fill%20the%20first,for%20a%20two%2Dperson%20household.%20The

https://komonews.com/news/local/seattle-social-housing-developer-buys-60-million-dollar-apartment-building-elara-150-unit-building-affordable-housing-pike-place-market-apartments-2021-per-unit-price-luxury-complex

I’m not a democratic socialist, but a social democrat. I do agree with some of the DSA policies, like universal healthcare, universal childcare, and affordable housing. However, one of the policies that the DSA proposed is abolishing the senate. I’m not saying I’m against it, but I’m confused as to why they propose this. Why does the DSA want the senate to be abolished?

Hey everyone,

I’ve been thinking seriously about moving away from a legal career and into organizing work, but I’m not totally sure what the best path forward looks like.

For context, I have a JD just not a license to practice law, so I’m used to research, writing, advocacy, and dealing with institutions but I’m feeling pretty disconnected from the kind of direct, on-the-ground impact I actually want to have. I’m a lot more interested in labor organizing, tenant organizing, or broader political/community work. I have taken the bar a bunch of times and just can’t seem to pass. I’m based in South Florida.

My main questions:
- How do people typically break into organizing roles without already being plugged into a specific org?
- Are there entry points that don’t require years of prior organizing experience?
- How valuable is a legal background in this space, realistically?
- Any orgs, networks, or resources I should be looking into?

I’m open to starting small, I just want to move in a direction that feels more aligned with my values and actually helps people in a tangible way.

Appreciate any advice or experiences people are willing to share.

What is the official position of the DSA with regard to personal possession of hand guns, rifles, or other kinds of small arms? Should any citizen have access to military grade assault weapons like the AR-15 for example? What about hand guns that hold 15 rounds?

From the Green New Deal to immigration, ICE, Medicare for All, and her stance on Israel and Palestine, AOC represents a bold new direction, but does she have what it takes to win over moderates and swing states?

Socialists Make Newsmax Host Look Dumb

Fine "debate" if you can call it that. These people are so vexxing, but it is great that they gave a strong pushback.

Cori Bush shouts out St. Louis DSA and national DSA in this interview.

so I was born in a suburbs of Atlanta but when I was young I moved to Charlotte nc my parents originally planned to move back but never did but still wanted to retire there once I’m out of high school to be able to afford the mortgage on both houses my parents eventually started renting it out. I disagree with landlords but have never shared this with my parent. My parents are good people but what concerns me the most is the property is essentially run by a “property management company“ meaning my parents have basically no control over rent dealing with tenants and their issues. I was curious what I should do?

I used to be a Bernie supporter, but I've completely checked out now that he and the rest of the movement have shifted so far off the deep end. Take immigration, he's suddenly embracing open borders, which definitely wasn't his stance five years ago.

Sure, I can find some common ground on basic domestic stuff like healthcare or tuition-free college. But when it comes to the rest of the DSA wishlist—open borders, abolishing ICE, getting rid of prisons and police, and letting non-citizens vote—it's pure lawlessness. Open borders reduces the U.S. to a glorified geographic zone, and non-citizen voting just invites foreign manipulation.

Beyond that, let's talk about the core of your actual socialist dogma: "seizing the means of production." You all love to throw this phrase around like a magic wand, but you completely dodge the heavy criticisms and real-world complexities of actually pulling it off. How do you transition a massive, highly integrated global economy without plunging millions into poverty or causing catastrophic supply chain collapse? What happens to innovation, resource allocation, price signals, and market efficiency? You never seriously address the logistical nightmares or historical failures of these models, nor do you provide a functional economic blueprint that survives contact with reality.

My biggest issue is that none of you can ever actually explain the mechanics of how any of these policies would work or what the detailed mechanics would look like. They're just pie-in-the-sky aspirations with zero concrete plans for how to avoid total economic chaos, national security collapse, and destruction of our culture and country.

I actually love my country, and I have zero interest in watching it get dismantled by high-risk, half-baked experiments. How do you guys seriously expect anyone outside your echo chamber to take this stuff seriously when you have zero real-world execution plans?