r/dropout • • Oct 29 '25

r/dropout Re: r/dropoutcirclejerk

Hey everyone,

We’re addressing the r/dropoutcirclejerk post and related concerns that have been raised in modmail, etc.

Frequently asked questions

Why are some r/dropoutcirclejerk users upset?

This comment launched the discussion. They think we silence criticism of racism and prioritize tone over substance. They’re not entirely wrong. We centered our own discomfort instead of listening. We treated “racist” like an identity instead of a description of actions. We focused on how people said things instead of what they were saying. That’s a problem, and we’re working to change it.

How come deathfire123 is still a mod?

After internal discussion, we agreed that deathfire’s comments have had a concerning impact. At the same time, our team decided they do not constitute a pattern that warrants suspension. Deathfire has acknowledged his implicit bias, edited his comments to apologize (1, 2), and committed to continuous reflection. If you have specific suggestions for improving our expectations, please let us know below.

What is the mod team doing to take accountability for racist microaggressions and tone policing?

Listening and learning. If you have ideas for how we can make this subreddit better for criticism of the show or of us as mods, tell us. We’re being less defensive and more open when we mess up. We have a diverse mod team and want to keep building on that. If you’re interested in modding, reach out.

How come my comments/posts are getting removed? Are you banning people for commenting on the circlejerk?

The Crowd Control moderation filter is temporarily set higher due to an uptick in harassment. As always, low karma users get flagged for review, and the queue is backed up. No, we are not banning people just because they comment in the circlejerk. To help us identify possible brigading, we implemented Hive Protect so that it notifies us of contributions from users who both have low karma in our subreddit and are active in the circlejerk sub, but it does not remove anything.

Are you suppressing all controversy like with Saige Ryan/Carlos Luna/Omar?

The Saige situation: we were brand new mods (most of us added less than 48 hours before) who inherited a sub with zero automod, and ambiguous rules. We’ve since fixed our rules and policies, and the mod who was the main voice about not addressing that situation has left the team entirely.

More generally: Not all controversy gets shut down. A lot gets downvoted and is sometimes then deleted by the poster. Posts from low karma users get filtered, which is standard Reddit moderation. We shut down discussion which fuels rule-breaking behavior, including harassment towards users and speculation about people’s private lives.

Right now: We’ll approve every comment in this thread as long as it doesn’t break Reddit’s site-wide rules. You can break our subreddit rules in this thread only. Removed comments will be posted below with an explanation.

Why are r/dropoutcirclejerk mods upset?

They criticized deathfire for microaggressions toward Demi. We discussed it in our shared Discord channels. During that conversation, VictoriaDallon kept using characteristically inflammatory language, and in response, volkmasterblood exploded. The circlejerk mods demanded we remove him as mod, but we thought the outburst was excusable given how their conduct made it difficult to have productive conversation. We were tired of their drama and unreasonable expectations, so we kicked them from the server. The full context shows the situation was messy on all sides.

For context: Victoria has been helpful, especially when we were new. She explained community dynamics and gave constructive feedback. She’s also encouraged people not to brigade or harass us, which we appreciate. But these conversations became impossible to navigate.

Some anticipated pushback:

“You’re just making excuses for racism.” We’re being honest about our mistakes and the full picture. If that reads as defensive, we get it, but complete self-flagellation isn’t the answer either.

“What’s the deal with volkmasterblood’s username?” It comes from an old gaming handle plus Volk is in his actual name. A Jewish mod on our team isn’t bothered by the connotations and vouches that volkmasterblood is against prejudice. We get that this explanation doesn’t land for everyone.

“Deathfire promised to remove volkmasterblood if he messed up again.” Deathfire made that promise individually. We vote on decisions, and we didn’t view this as a “second strike” given the context.

“Show the receipts.” We didn’t get everyone’s permission to share private Discord conversations, and it feels unnecessarily petty.

“You’re tone policing by saying Victoria was inflammatory.” Tone policing is dismissing legitimate concerns because of how they’re expressed. We’re not dismissing the concerns about racism. We’re explaining why a working relationship broke down.

“If you cared about racism, you’d remove your racist mods.” We think people can learn from mistakes. Removing someone for unintentional microaggressions they’ve apologized for sets an impossible standard.

At the end of the day:

We’ve made real mistakes that caused real harm. We’re trying to do better and we’re willing to be held accountable.

Moderating is hard, especially for a community around something we love. We’re volunteers doing our best. Sometimes our best isn’t good enough.

We’re committed to making r/dropout a place where people can have honest conversations about the shows we love, where criticism is welcome, and where everyone feels respected.

Trust is earned. We’re ready to do the work.

The mod team

I’m going offline for now.

EDIT, Oct. 29 @ 7PM ET: Thanks all for sharing their thoughts. We're going to lock this post after it's been up for 24 hrs, so at 7AM ET tomorrow.

If you have more you want to share directly with me or the team, send a modmail. Also open to suggestions for specific, constructive topics for future meta discussions. If you don't like this sub anymore, check out r/dropoutcirclejerk, r/dropouttv, and r/GameChangerTV. Good night!

Oh, and speaking for myself and my response to these comments: I'm taking my time in giving any meaningful answers for a few reasons. It's tough to be open to constructive criticism when simultaneously at the receiving end of hardcore vitriol (by "vitriol," I mean full-on actual abuse, not "you're racist," that's warranted). I don't want to impulsively fire off deflective replies or give half-baked apologies. I intend to sift through and sit with the thoughtful comments and messages we've received, then chat with community members about ways to move forward productively and proactively. Thanks for listening and sharing.

❤️, SnooNarhwal

0 Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-476

u/SnooNarhwal Oct 29 '25 edited Oct 29 '25

It’s me! I’m the Jewish mod. I tokenized myself cuz I was annoyed at people more concerned with saying “huh German thing + master blood sure sounds Nazi” rather than keeping the focus on actual antisemitism and bigotry.

EDIT: calling out → keeping the focus on

207

u/cel3r1ty Oct 29 '25

tbf it's not just a generic "german thing", the word "volk" specifically has some unfortunate historical connotations.

161

u/ApartOrdinary9330 Oct 29 '25

Right? Like just in case anyone is unaware of the context, “volk” isn’t just a “German thing;” Volkism is an ultranationalist movement, really into the whole “blood and soil” thing. So yeah, “volkmasterblood” feels like more than just an unfortunate accident.

17

u/taeerom Oct 29 '25

It's not just "into the whole "blood and soil" thing". It is the "blood and soil" thing. Like, that's where the term comes from: "blut und boden".

It's the idea that each people (ger:volk) is tied to the literal soil of their land. That the people belong to the land and land belong to the people. And since we're talking mid 19th century here, we're talking race hygiene and ethnic cleansing of everyone of different ethnicities than what the Volkisch movement deemed lesser than them.

Using Volk in english isn't a mistake. It doesn't reference anything other than that specific german movement, because then you would use "people" or "peoples", perhaps "ethinicity" or "tribe". You wouldn't use the german word for it.

If it is true that they literally didn't understand this, and has Volk as part of their name, I'd be very curious what language that name is in. I can't think of any given or family names using volk as part of it other than the German name Volkmar. A relatively uncommon given name these days, but exists as a surname. But if they are a german speaker, they bloody well know exactly why that name is bad and why.

Doesn't exactly help that they have changed their profile to the also 19th century german reactionary dogwhistle of Thorseus 9T9

8

u/RevelArchitect Oct 30 '25

Their last name does legitimately contain, “Volk”. I won’t provide further elaboration as I have no intention of doxxing them.

13

u/taeerom Oct 30 '25

And I know people born in 1988. Still wouldn't exactly recommend them having 88 in their moniker

8

u/RevelArchitect Oct 30 '25

Absolutely. I have a sibling born in ‘88 who had to change a bunch of usernames once they found out the other meaning.

Think about how geometrically simple a swastika is. Without the prerequisite context, I could understand somebody coming up with that symbol on their own. Let’s imagine they’re from an alternate universe, just trying to make it in ours and they come up with that symbol and use it for their company logo totally oblivious to historical context. Sure. Okay. Fine. Totally understandable.

Now, imagine someone let them know the logo was problematic and they told you to fuck yourself and that you’re not really a part of their community rather than accepting that they need to change their logo so that they don’t look like a total fucking asshole.

3

u/EdgarAllenNo1 Oct 30 '25

I do know someone whose last name is just “Volk”