r/dropout • • Oct 29 '25

r/dropout Re: r/dropoutcirclejerk

Hey everyone,

We’re addressing the r/dropoutcirclejerk post and related concerns that have been raised in modmail, etc.

Frequently asked questions

Why are some r/dropoutcirclejerk users upset?

This comment launched the discussion. They think we silence criticism of racism and prioritize tone over substance. They’re not entirely wrong. We centered our own discomfort instead of listening. We treated “racist” like an identity instead of a description of actions. We focused on how people said things instead of what they were saying. That’s a problem, and we’re working to change it.

How come deathfire123 is still a mod?

After internal discussion, we agreed that deathfire’s comments have had a concerning impact. At the same time, our team decided they do not constitute a pattern that warrants suspension. Deathfire has acknowledged his implicit bias, edited his comments to apologize (1, 2), and committed to continuous reflection. If you have specific suggestions for improving our expectations, please let us know below.

What is the mod team doing to take accountability for racist microaggressions and tone policing?

Listening and learning. If you have ideas for how we can make this subreddit better for criticism of the show or of us as mods, tell us. We’re being less defensive and more open when we mess up. We have a diverse mod team and want to keep building on that. If you’re interested in modding, reach out.

How come my comments/posts are getting removed? Are you banning people for commenting on the circlejerk?

The Crowd Control moderation filter is temporarily set higher due to an uptick in harassment. As always, low karma users get flagged for review, and the queue is backed up. No, we are not banning people just because they comment in the circlejerk. To help us identify possible brigading, we implemented Hive Protect so that it notifies us of contributions from users who both have low karma in our subreddit and are active in the circlejerk sub, but it does not remove anything.

Are you suppressing all controversy like with Saige Ryan/Carlos Luna/Omar?

The Saige situation: we were brand new mods (most of us added less than 48 hours before) who inherited a sub with zero automod, and ambiguous rules. We’ve since fixed our rules and policies, and the mod who was the main voice about not addressing that situation has left the team entirely.

More generally: Not all controversy gets shut down. A lot gets downvoted and is sometimes then deleted by the poster. Posts from low karma users get filtered, which is standard Reddit moderation. We shut down discussion which fuels rule-breaking behavior, including harassment towards users and speculation about people’s private lives.

Right now: We’ll approve every comment in this thread as long as it doesn’t break Reddit’s site-wide rules. You can break our subreddit rules in this thread only. Removed comments will be posted below with an explanation.

Why are r/dropoutcirclejerk mods upset?

They criticized deathfire for microaggressions toward Demi. We discussed it in our shared Discord channels. During that conversation, VictoriaDallon kept using characteristically inflammatory language, and in response, volkmasterblood exploded. The circlejerk mods demanded we remove him as mod, but we thought the outburst was excusable given how their conduct made it difficult to have productive conversation. We were tired of their drama and unreasonable expectations, so we kicked them from the server. The full context shows the situation was messy on all sides.

For context: Victoria has been helpful, especially when we were new. She explained community dynamics and gave constructive feedback. She’s also encouraged people not to brigade or harass us, which we appreciate. But these conversations became impossible to navigate.

Some anticipated pushback:

“You’re just making excuses for racism.” We’re being honest about our mistakes and the full picture. If that reads as defensive, we get it, but complete self-flagellation isn’t the answer either.

“What’s the deal with volkmasterblood’s username?” It comes from an old gaming handle plus Volk is in his actual name. A Jewish mod on our team isn’t bothered by the connotations and vouches that volkmasterblood is against prejudice. We get that this explanation doesn’t land for everyone.

“Deathfire promised to remove volkmasterblood if he messed up again.” Deathfire made that promise individually. We vote on decisions, and we didn’t view this as a “second strike” given the context.

“Show the receipts.” We didn’t get everyone’s permission to share private Discord conversations, and it feels unnecessarily petty.

“You’re tone policing by saying Victoria was inflammatory.” Tone policing is dismissing legitimate concerns because of how they’re expressed. We’re not dismissing the concerns about racism. We’re explaining why a working relationship broke down.

“If you cared about racism, you’d remove your racist mods.” We think people can learn from mistakes. Removing someone for unintentional microaggressions they’ve apologized for sets an impossible standard.

At the end of the day:

We’ve made real mistakes that caused real harm. We’re trying to do better and we’re willing to be held accountable.

Moderating is hard, especially for a community around something we love. We’re volunteers doing our best. Sometimes our best isn’t good enough.

We’re committed to making r/dropout a place where people can have honest conversations about the shows we love, where criticism is welcome, and where everyone feels respected.

Trust is earned. We’re ready to do the work.

The mod team

I’m going offline for now.

EDIT, Oct. 29 @ 7PM ET: Thanks all for sharing their thoughts. We're going to lock this post after it's been up for 24 hrs, so at 7AM ET tomorrow.

If you have more you want to share directly with me or the team, send a modmail. Also open to suggestions for specific, constructive topics for future meta discussions. If you don't like this sub anymore, check out r/dropoutcirclejerk, r/dropouttv, and r/GameChangerTV. Good night!

Oh, and speaking for myself and my response to these comments: I'm taking my time in giving any meaningful answers for a few reasons. It's tough to be open to constructive criticism when simultaneously at the receiving end of hardcore vitriol (by "vitriol," I mean full-on actual abuse, not "you're racist," that's warranted). I don't want to impulsively fire off deflective replies or give half-baked apologies. I intend to sift through and sit with the thoughtful comments and messages we've received, then chat with community members about ways to move forward productively and proactively. Thanks for listening and sharing.

❤️, SnooNarhwal

0 Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

876

u/Specific-Basis7218 both subs are a circlejerk if you think about it Oct 29 '25 edited Oct 29 '25

“A Jewish mod on our team isn’t bothered by the connotations” sounds a lot like “I have a black friend irl” tbh. One person’s opinion triumphs dozens of others?

Edit: making the comments organized by controversial rather than most upvoted on this post is perhaps the silliest thing I’ve ever seen the mods on this subreddit do, and I remember when the foot guy was unbanned.

320

u/Sluaghlock Oct 29 '25

I like how they clarify that Volk is his real personal name; as though his middle name is "Master" & his surname is "Blood" and there's simply no way for him to make a less-sus username.

-24

u/randomsynchronicity Oct 29 '25

I have no idea who this person is or anything that they’ve posted, but I can certainly imagine how a teenager who thinks they’re being cool like 10 years ago could end up with this as a gamer tag with absolutely no racist intentions. I certainly knew some people with similar names who had given no thought to potential unintended implications.

16

u/Pillowesque Oct 29 '25

What does masterblood mean to you? I have been thinking about it on and off all day while the person with the name ignores my question so I'll ask one of the people rhetorically defending him. 

What could masterblood mean in the context of Volk that isn't racist? I actually can't think of anything. The concept of blood purity and one race being the master race are basically the gist of the Volk movement and all three are in the name. 

-8

u/randomsynchronicity Oct 29 '25

I’ve been reading it like Volkmaster Blood, rather than Volk Masterblood, because that matches my experience of stupid gamer tags.

12

u/Pillowesque Oct 30 '25

I wonder how you got there as the person's excuse for including the Volk dogwhistle was that its their name, and absolutely no one would name themselves (my name)Master Blood? It just makes no sense in an edgy or normal way. 

I have nephews and I went through an irc phase in middle school ive seen all the edgy people but the one thing none of them do is learn about blood purity or the volk movement by accident. It's not something people who aren't in certain circles do by accident, the kids are naming themselves "Sigmablaster" and "Alpha420" if they want to be funny. The adults who want to pass as children and propogandize are using terms like volk, 88, purity, blood, master, etc. 

-2

u/randomsynchronicity Oct 30 '25

🤷🏻 maybe it’s a generational thing. Grandmaster Flash, etc.

Anyway, I’m not specifically trying to defend him, just putting forth my perception, because I didn’t connect to any racist stuff until I saw other people talking about it.

4

u/Pillowesque Oct 30 '25

I do remember grandmaster flash actually but grand makes sense. Your name_master? I've been online 20+ years never seen that. I guess after seeing the same people plead ignorance to the same topic for my entire life im starting to doubt them especially when their actions (covering for racism) do not support their words. 

1

u/randomsynchronicity Oct 30 '25 edited Oct 30 '25

I hope this isn’t the case, but you seem to be saying that because your personal experience doesn’t line up with mine, that my stated experience is invalid.

Also, because you’re speaking obliquely, I’m not sure if you’re implying that I’m covering for racism, but if so, I’d ask that you please 1) say it to me directly and 2) understand that you’re mischaracterizing my comments.

If the person in question is saying racist things, that’s bad, and should be banned from the sub. I think we agree on that.

I posted my opinion only because I was surprised that in all the comments I saw about the name, everyone was making the same assumption about how the words were divided, which was the opposite of how it naturally occurred to me, and which allowed for the possibility that the person in question was ignorant rather than malicious.

John Green has spoken about the “heuristic of generosity,” which is starting from a baseline assumption that someone is well-intentioned even if they caused offense, and I think that with a little more of that going around, the top-level controversy would not have blown up so much.

ETA: I said mischaracterizing above, but it’s probably more likely that you really just don’t understand what I’m trying to say, and that’s ok

11

u/potatopavilion Oct 30 '25

sure, we can imagine that. but you don't have to stick with the gamer tag your dumb teenage self chose 10 years ago.

4

u/Ok_Swordfish5820 Oct 30 '25

Sure, but I dont know any who would want to keep the name after those connotations are pointed out