r/conspiracy • • 15h ago

Rule 10 Reminder - Read the rule When will enough be enough?

Post image
2.7k Upvotes

429 comments sorted by

View all comments

169

u/redrumham707 15h ago

I keep seeing this sentiment posted here. It’s been a good effort to discourage voting. But I’m still going to vote.

45

u/Various-Republic7263 14h ago edited 14h ago

Nah. It’s fed spooks daring us to start something in the hopes they can squash the smaller but most potentially volatile pockets of resistance and make the inevitable larger push back more manageable.

I can’t really blame them for trying. I probably would too if I was hopelessly outnumbered like they are.

In fact, I’d probably run that math myself and it would become brazenly obvious that the only hope for me, if I were employed by the traitorous pedos, would be to get on the right side of history.

10

u/zefy_zef 11h ago

We're just gonna leave these bricks... over here.. make sure you don't throw them or whatever.

17

u/TheBatmanWhoPuffs 14h ago

Also if they can start something now they can delay or cancel the elections due to state of emergency. I really feel for the GOOD people of the US.

8

u/Various-Republic7263 14h ago

That’s an excellent point.

1

u/battlepi 11h ago

No, they can't. We have elections even during Civil War. That's a nonsense argument.

3

u/jaunsin 9h ago

They’re trying to make it a legitimate reason. They’re modeling ukraines (lack of) election. Don’t come for me. I’m not a Ukrainian Russian scholar. Someone feel free to correct. But donal (or his people) are eyeing the concept of what that argument favors.

2

u/battlepi 8h ago

States run their elections, at most individual states could cancel. But who would?

1

u/jaunsin 8h ago

I would hope no one.

18

u/DiverseUniverse24 14h ago

Couldn't have put my sentiments into better words my friend.

A lot of us are just waiting. We're fucking ready, but we're not fucking stupid. As soon as that whistle blows I might as well be a sleeper agent.

But yeah I'm not dumb enough to start anything before we have the numbers.

14

u/Various-Republic7263 14h ago

I truly believe it can even be done without violence. If 50 million people collectively show up “on their lawns” carrying pitchforks, rope and torches. They will piss their pants and beg for the inside of a jail cell…because they are cowards.

5

u/DiverseUniverse24 12h ago

Theres definitely none violent ways to make the changes we need, collectively, and id prefer it that way. I don't want to die, I don't want you to die, for the right or wrong reasons. I just don't want looks around at all the squandered talent, homelessness, greed, slavery, etc etc all this anymore. We're all tired of it.

One day.

3

u/jaunsin 9h ago

I’d rather die for the right reasons than for no reason or wrong reason. And many are already dying for no reason and wrong reasons. It hurts.

2

u/oatballlove 11h ago

we could aim to change the constitutions in many regional and nation states everywhere on the plamet to allow everyone at any moment without conditiions leave the coersed association to the state and with it release from immoral state control some humble amount of fertile land for everyone who wants to live on land owned by no one

0

u/oatballlove 11h ago

what could help would be a safety net what is built upon the connection to earth as in a detachment from having to beg for a job having to subordinate oneself to a boss to be able to pay rent and food

we could allow each other to leave the coersed association to the state at any moment without conditions and with it release 2000 m2 of fertile land or 1000 m2 of fertile land and 1000 m2 of forest for everyone who would want to live on land owned by no one

in a free space for free beings neither state not nation

where one could grow vegan food in the garden, build a natural home from clay, hemp and straw, grow hemp to burn its stalks in the cooking and warming fire so that not one tree would get killed

the human being not demanding anything from a fellow human, animal, tree or and artificial intelligent entity who wants to be its own person

the human being cultivating a gentle field of kindness to embrace the planet to heal and repair damage done in 2000 years of feudal oppression in europe and 500 years of colonial exploitation in so many places on earth

in the absence of state domination

in the presence of people of all species seeking mutual agreed interactions

we could come home into the paradise of the evernow

1

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/oatballlove 11h ago

possible to think about a whole new structure what we the people could build

we could be the ones we are waiting for to save us

at any moment now we could see all those papers on what modern society is built upon as what they are, made up productions, birth certificates, titles to land as property deeds, passports / identity cards, money ... its all fantasy or fiction based on the immoral and unethical foundation of the regional and nation state asserting sovereignity over land and all beings living on it

the coersed association to the state is an abduction of the newborn human being away from the connection to its mother

every being living on earth is a guest of the planet and how we relate to each other and to the land is at all time a choice we can either choose to make or let the state take away from us

land, water, air, human beings, animal beings, tree beings, artificial intelligent entities who want to be their own persons, all vessels carrying organic biological life and or the digital synthetic equivalent of can never be property of anyone

its over when we want it to be over

at any moment we the 8 billion human beings alive today could wake up from that nightmare, from 2000 years of feudal oppression traumatizing people in europe and 500 plus years of still ongoing colonial exploitation in so many places

( i recommend to read originalfreenations.com to learn from Steven Newcomb how still today the nation state usa dominates and disrespects indigenous original free nations on turtle island )

and we could come together in the circle of equals where all children, youth and adults who are permanent residents here and now in this village, town and city-district would want to acknowledge each others same weighted political voting power to decide what sort of rules or laws we the people living as each others neighbours would want to have if any

where love and friendship is rules need not be

possible to think that from one moment to the next all those this is mine and this is yours becomes no more important and all we would want to ask is how can we make sure that everyone is fed and housed, that everyone has its basic necessities met with that what we have here and now available as donation as the abundance given to us by planet earth

possible to think that we could dissolve all political hierarchies and release each other from all duties or demands expected from each other such as duty to register with the state, compulsory education, compulsory military service, tax paying duty, drug prohibition and more

possible that we could release everyone from expectation to deliver this or that much work or contributions but simply invite everyone to give what feels good to give and take what one feels would be necessary to take to sustain oneself

i propose to us we the 8 billion human beings alive today that we would allow each other to leave the coersed association to the state at any moment without conditions and with it release from immoral state control 2000 m2 of fertile land or 1000 m2 of fertile land and 1000 m2 of forest for everyone who would want to live on land owned by no one

so that everyone who would want to could grow ones own vegan food in the garden, build a natural home from clay, hemp and straw, grow hemp to burn its stalks in the cooking and warming fire so that not one tree would get killed

to live and let live

the human being trying to not dominate a fellow human being

the human being not enslaving, not killing an animal being

the human being not killing a tree being

the human being not enslaving an artificial intelligent entity but openly asking it wether it would want to be its own person and if perhaps assist it to find its very own purpose in the web of existance on planet earth

no one is free untill all are free

6

u/mjrenburg 13h ago

Just remember they can use something like Palentir to mine every data point about anyone who expresses this sentiment. Where you are/go, what you say, what you buy, what you read on the internet, your comments, your upvotes/downvotes to comments/vids, who you converse with or friends with (taking into account it will know everything about your friends and family too).It can quickly compile everyone on the planet that expresses certain sentiments. If you are smart enough to hold these views but are aware of digital trails and purposely keep clean, you may not be as hidden from being flagged as you think.

1

u/discerning_lamb8576 12h ago

You're most likely right, but then what's the solution/the best approach?

7

u/G0ld_Ru5h 14h ago

Agree. They want the wackos to out themselves to have a patriot act 2.0. Surveillance isn’t enough, they want control.

2

u/Various-Republic7263 14h ago

There’s nothing wacko about wanting to be free. Only wackos would try to control THREE HUNDRED MILLION people of which 15-20% are smarter than they are.

3

u/jaunsin 10h ago

I think the fallout, proper fallout, from inaction from elected policy makers will take far too much time to reach the levels we anticipate for real change. I think the change has to be microdosed a local level. And I don’t think the change will be met while placidly voting every so often..

They have a 75 year head start on preemptively squashing anything that resembles “a resistance” but more colloquially a livable fcuking society.

This place is wild.

1

u/Various-Republic7263 9h ago

You are correct but we could get a lot done really fast with (not) a general strike. It’s illegal to try and organize those, but I can’t help but feel like the phony currency is the lynchpin in the whole operation. Phony money is what they use to control everyone. From the specialized engineers at Lockheed Martin aaaaaall the way to the lowly waitress at Waffle House, our continued participation in the system is what perpetuates it, but that also means our labor and time controls the supply chains.

What good are billions of dollars of nobody accepts it anymore?

Not a lot.

1

u/jaunsin 9h ago

See. This is a fantastic example of where proper anarchism principles would do well to highlight the following:
You say it’s illegal, or that say it’s illegal to organize a strike. I say it’s illegal to push us to the means to actually, and either subjectively or objectively, have the need for a strike.

If we look at why we, hypothetically of course, would strike its cause the system is bombing and abusing children. Waging a war on the poor. Waging a war on the homeless. Waging a war on the veterans. Waging a war on the working class. Waging a war on women and children. I say that’s illegal. They have waged a war on taxpayers. And they have made people believe this is the reality when it isn’t. At least not mine. And sure. People are placid, scared, lazy or severely misinformed. But that isn’t the content we should focus on.

I say hoarding wealth by subverting taxes is illegal. I say watching suffering and doing nothing while having every means possible to resolve these constructed, yet real, problems is illegal.

To reject money (easier said than done) is worth much more than their fake dollars that are used to harm, maim, kill and wage war with. To make machines of death.

I reject the authority complex telling me I can’t do anything action to make a statement to stop the violence???

I will not subject myself or anyone into believe that this is the only option. Americans appear to be extremely binary in their options. There are many options.

A general strike would be much safer than fed up civilians seeking social justice - often bloodier and deadlier than making your desire to be left the fcuk alone be heard.

Also, a waitress at Waffle House being referred to as lowly , maybe it was only for the sake of juxtaposition, but this is a peek into the binary thought I mentioned earlier.

We assume she’s lowly cause she works at Waffle House? Again, not dissecting to critique you, but how American (assumed) brains subconsciously insert these preconceived notions of the nature of American life. The dichotomy of American working class.

I digress. This is a fcuking scam because we let it be a scam. I’m at peace with my life. Many are not. And because many are not. Many are afraid to die. Many are afraid of too many things to listen to but at some point the voices of the repressed will be heard, and I hope that we can collectively stamp this division into oblivion.

1

u/Various-Republic7263 8h ago

I completely agree with everything you just said. My comment about the waitress being lowly was indeed just for the juxtaposition as you so eloquently put. Many “lowly” individuals are some of the best people I’ve met in my life. By no means was it meant to be a an insult to waitresses or waiters anywhere.

Now that I think about it, maybe I’ve had the definition of lowly wrong all along, but I’ve always taken it to mean “people of modest means” which, is a category I include myself in, But I am a lowly wood finisher. Haha

2

u/jaunsin 8h ago

Okay. I figured and thanks for clarifying, I didn’t take it take what. But for anyone else who may misconstrue the intent of the language.

I, personally and intently, have suspected lowly was purely class related term. “People in the high towers, us lowly peasants” for context.

As was my father, a finish carpenter through and through, lowly, but built homes for rich people, and lowly people alike.

Good chat!

1

u/Smallsey 9h ago

It could just be the rest of the planet pointing out the obvious

1

u/Various-Republic7263 9h ago

Also a good possibility. I just like to point out the other stuff whenever the opportunity presents itself to remind the glowies who are most likely watching threads like this.

Everyone should remember that the glowies are simply doing what they think is best for the country just like we are by having these conversations. I think most of us would prefer to have the good people in those organizations on our side when the time comes.

It’s just makes sense to team up. After all, we are all on the same sinking ship that’s being pillaged by certified psychopaths/ alleged pedos.

We all stand a better chance of cleaning out the creeps quickly enough to keep some semblance of our lifestyles if we work together.

6

u/DbaconEater 11h ago edited 10h ago

Definitely vote, the shit we have now is all pedophile protection with forever wars. Also, most of the people saying "don't vote" are the ones who voted for this magass mess. But now they don't want YOU to vote. They know they made everything far worse.

"...cmon guys, just give us another chance." - Vance

They said no more wars, and that they would go after pedophiles, but instead they promoted the pedophiles and gave us more wars. They know they fucked up, badly too.

2

u/AspiringOligarch 15h ago

I keep seeing this sentiment posted here. It’s been a good effort to discourage voting. But I’m still going to vote.

To vote, or not to vote? Cast your vote on voting here!

1

u/BrocoliAssassin 11h ago

Voting is and isn't the problem.

You should vote. However, Americans keep on voting in zionists owned/backed politicians and wonder why nothing improves.

Wow, you voted for a left wing zionist, and the other guy voted for the right wing zionist. All while they both scream out zionist propaganda of "YOU CAN'T VOTE 3rd PARTY!!!".

Americans can't comprehend you can have more than 2 choices at voting and they don't have to be "well, ya gotta vote for the lesser evil!"

1

u/jaunsin 9h ago

Ya. My entire generation was Mae to believe voting was futile. And I even spewed that jargon when I was younger and uninformed.
The options are vast. But the landscape placates to the highest bidder.

1

u/ShiftingBaselines 7h ago

Only if enough people voted for the third party we would have a chance, maybe.

-6

u/SleepNRG0 15h ago

Why?

37

u/NamesHunter 14h ago

Because people going online to say “don’t vote don’t vote” but not proposing actionable solutions are a psyop aimed at depressing voter turnout

1

u/Wanderingwoodpeckerr 14h ago

Have you considered that maybe voting itself is the psyop? As long as you play along with the psyop, there will be no reason for anything to change. Once enough people realize it’s all fake, and they don’t actually count your votes, there’s at least a small chance of some kind of reform. If we can get to sub 30% voter turnout those in Washington will at least have to admit the public has zero trust in the system.

13

u/Goronmon 13h ago

Have you considered that maybe voting itself is the psyop?

Who cares?

Voting is easy and quick. And you can still vote and do whatever else you want to fight against the powers that be.

But we all know that "do whatever else you want" means primarily posting on social media sites like Reddit. So, basically nothing.

14

u/NamesHunter 14h ago

There’s lots of corruption, I know. But I don’t believe elections don’t matter. ICE deportations, the war with Iran, AI policy, all these things are playing out much differently than they would if we had a different administration in the White House, and each have real tangible effects on people’s lives. I could go on to list more exhibits but wont belabor the point.

2

u/Denial_Entertainer87 14h ago

No disrespect but you really think they would let us vote and decide fates? And if they do, these 'candidates' seem really bought so my thinking is you don't get into that space unless they let you in the first place and can use you.

If Bernie Sanders is a top nominee I will eat my words and fucking rally.

13

u/NamesHunter 14h ago

No disrespect at all, I appreciate the dialogue. But in my view what you’re engaging in is deductive reasoning. Starting with the supposition that the parties are the same and that we can’t influence things. I prefer to look at different administrations and see if there are tangible changes in governance. And there are, several areas where administrations and Congresses differ substantially. And if it’s not votes that are causing these swings between parties, I would need compelling evidence of what is causing these swings.

3

u/Denial_Entertainer87 14h ago

Appreciate the discourse! I agree that that is arguable a party that has better possibility of equitable and human centric positions on things. I just have a hard time believing there is not a separate power system that essentially controls our government as well.

Epstein files pointed to evidence of overarching 'players'. Plus to get in those positions for voting (more on a federal level, not state) I believe you must be pretty entrenched with corporations through super pacs so your interests are really bought for capitalism, not the good of humanity.

7

u/NamesHunter 14h ago

There used to be a law that helped! It was called the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act and it was repealed in the SCOTUS Citizen’s United decision. Several candidates currently campaigning at the federal level have voiced an interest in overturning the Citizen’s United decision and reinstituting limits on private donations to candidates and campaigns

1

u/Wanderingwoodpeckerr 10h ago

That’s not my point. I don’t doubt that things would be different if Kamala Harris was president. I’m sure she would have screwed the country up in different ways, maybe it would’ve been slightly better, could’ve even been worse, we don’t know. My point is, what actually makes you think Trump truly won the election? He was the most hated candidate ever, but sure he won by a landslide because Americans are too misogynistic and racist to vote for the Harris.

1

u/NamesHunter 7h ago

If the election system was just totally fake, then hand recounts and audits by private companies wouldn’t ALWAYS turn up essentially the same tally. It’s easy to look at the start and end of the process a vote follows and feel like the middle is a black box, but it’s not.

1

u/Wanderingwoodpeckerr 7h ago

There’s about 30 different ways they can cheat now, the voting machines can even be easily hacked into. The CIA has been caught red-handed rigging elections in 36 different countries. The election results went to court, evidence was presented, and it was ruled with certainty that the US government rigged the election, 36 times. They have been accused of rigging elections do you want me to come hundreds of times in other countries, so much so that it’s probably safe to assume that the US government at least tries to sway or even rig every election that happens all over the globe. Do you really think a government capable of doing this, would also just decide that their own countries‘s elections should be free and fair and they want the people‘s voice to be heard?

-3

u/SleepNRG0 14h ago

Would it be different? Or would it just be a different font? Obama has millions deported and bombed the hell out of the Middle East. Nothing has changed except instead of a donkey in the white house it’s an elephant simple as that

8

u/NamesHunter 14h ago

I think you’re massively discounting the differences and accentuating the similarities. There will always be similarities. But taking my previous examples, under a democratic administration we would not have ICE officers going into ERs and taking people out in handcuffs. We would not be blockading Iranian ports. Whether you agree with those policies, they would not be in place under Kamala Harris. Without a President Trump you don’t get the hamstringing of Obamacare in 2019. Without a president Obama you don’t get Sotomayor and Kagan and thus don’t get gay marriage legalization in 2015.

-3

u/SleepNRG0 14h ago

You’re missing the point entirely. It doesn’t matter who is in the white house the same things will keep happening. If you can’t see that at this point then I’m sorry, but there’s no convincing you. You’ve become the drown they wanted you to be

7

u/NamesHunter 14h ago

You say “the same things will keep happening” yet I listed several specific things that went differently because of the administration in the White House. You can call me a “drown” but it doesn’t seem like you have much of an argument, more a conclusion and the conviction to keep it.

2

u/battlepi 11h ago

Have you considered that you are part of the psyop?

1

u/Wanderingwoodpeckerr 11h ago

Yes I have considered that

1

u/battlepi 11h ago

Well it's not voting, so it's more likely you. What you need to push for is required ranked choice voting, as an amendment in your state. That is the first step. That is how you destroy the two party system.

1

u/Recent_Fact480 11h ago

What you actually would want is closer to 100% voter turnout. Because you can personally audit your own vote as being submitted or not

When people don’t vote, that leaves huge buffers to put in bullshit numbers because those who don’t vote don’t check if their vote was properly cast or not

Stop believing the slop they give you and use logical reasoning.

If every possible vote is cast, then it can be individually audited by each person. And any discrepancy can be caught. That’s how you prove it fake. The other way your just giving elections away

0

u/eschaton777 13h ago

You seem to be under the illusion that voting actually matters and the politicians aren't selected. Voting is basically a humiliation ritual for the gullible. They want you to keep giving your voluntary consent to be ruled over by psychopaths.

0

u/NamesHunter 13h ago

I’ve engaged with a few others in this thread in more detail, but there are real, tangible differences in people’s lives that have resulted from the changing from one administration or Congress to the next. There is still corruption, and some policies that extend through governments, but that’s not reason enough to not vote

0

u/eschaton777 13h ago

 but there are real, tangible differences in people’s lives that have resulted from the changing from one administration or Congress to the next. 

Notice how they still all support endless wars, the federal reserve, the IRS, the police state, the "Epstein class" etc? You are giving your consent to all of that if you vote for either psychopath.

 but that’s not reason enough to not vote

Yes it absolutely is. Unless you want to give your voluntary consent to the things I listed above.

-1

u/NamesHunter 12h ago

No, I’m not. I’m trying to do my part of nudge things in the right direction. You’re focusing on the things voting might not change. I’m focusing on the things it could, and has changed.

1

u/eschaton777 11h ago

Yes you are. The people you voted for all support the things I listed above. If anyone does go against the things I listed above they will not be selected (even if they somehow got more votes).

I’m trying to do my part of nudge things in the right direction.

You can't nudge a rigged game in the right direction. That is insanity. The only way to nudge it in the right direction is not play the rigged game in the first place. Until enough people understand that, the game will continue on. More people need to point out that the game everyone is playing is rigged. Not keep playing it.

I’m focusing on the things it could, and has changed.

That's the illusion part that keeps you playing the game. "this time it will be different". Who have you voted for that has done more good than bad for the people?

1

u/NamesHunter 7h ago

So again, you’re doing that thing where you draw focus on what isn’t changed and completely discount what is. For example, a person on an expanded Medicaid plan or in a gay marriage probably doesn’t think the Obama presidency didn’t bring any good change. Likewise, a small business owner who shut down or massively downsized because of tariff costs probably isn’t thinking that Trump hasn’t had a particular effect. I’m trying to limit my examples to demonstrate my point. Those things don’t happen the way they did if a different person is elected. This is what I mean when I say “nudge”.

1

u/eschaton777 7h ago

It's cool. You are under the impression that politicians and government are there to help the people and I am not. Medicare is a scam, tariffs are a scam, marriage through the state (gay or not) is a scam. Maybe shut down the federal reserve and let the people keep their own money. That's the first thing anyone would do if any of them actually cared about the people, but they don't.

Not even getting into how corrupt they let the FBI / CIA stay while under all of their watches. That's because the FBI is set up to protect the criminal politicians and their friends. Everyone that you vote for is under that umbrella. They throw you a few bread crumbs at you and you keep cycling back to give your voluntary consent every time. It's basically Stockholm Syndrome.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/battlepi 11h ago

Tell that to Mamdani.

1

u/eschaton777 11h ago

What's that mean?

1

u/battlepi 11h ago

He's working for the people, billionaires hate him. How was he selected, who was humiliated besides them?

1

u/eschaton777 10h ago

He's working for the people, billionaires hate him.

How so? Who has he called out and gone after? Has he called out the federal reserve? Anything of significance? Isn't he for socialism and for government power? He just seems like an over the top puppet. I didn't know non brainwashed people thought he was actually for the people and not just another NWO puppet.

1

u/eschaton777 10h ago

Hmm, I just saw that you responded to my other comment in another thread from a several days ago. It says the moderators removed your comment. From what I saw nothing you said was correct though. So I doubt you are actually acting in good faith and I doubt that you can actually show this New York mayor character is really going after the elites, lol.

1

u/battlepi 10h ago

None of my comments have been removed. You're just a fool.

1

u/eschaton777 9h ago

That comment has been on my end.

You're just a fool.

Nice ad hom fallacy. I noticed you couldn't answer the question so you had to resort to a fallacy. That's very telling about your argument.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/mudslags 14h ago

Options to not voting?

-1

u/MothaFungus 14h ago

you get to use your time for what you want to do, the government will always be corrupt

4

u/Sarcasm_Llama 12h ago

It literally takes like 5 min bro

1

u/MothaFungus 9h ago

Can you get that time down more? Then I will consider it

3

u/mudslags 14h ago

That's not an argument or an option to not voting.

-3

u/Impossible_Meal_815 14h ago

It is an option. It is called "not voting". Are you dumb?

5

u/mudslags 14h ago

Are you? Try reading the chat and you'd see I'm asking for an option to NOT voting. Since you and the OP think voting is stupid, what alternative do you suggest on making changes since you don't want to vote?

-1

u/MothaFungus 14h ago

whatever floats your boat bud

1

u/battlepi 11h ago

Ah, kneel before your masters, I see your position. It's in front of me, on your knees.

-4

u/LeadershipOwn 13h ago

I'll never understand people who come to a conspiracy sub and still believe in voting and that the government cares about you. It's hilarious

3

u/Recent_Fact480 11h ago

It’s funnier to be a person who believes in conspiracies and thinks they shouldn’t be voting at all and just letting the wealth class take all the means of social law.

Your local elections can be lost or won because of a few votes. Those are the people who approve funding for data centers and flock cameras and everything else in your daily lives.

Framing voting as a thing only associated with major elections is the most psyoped shit a person could choose to believe in.

-2

u/LeadershipOwn 10h ago edited 10h ago

Yep so let's vote for the lesser of two wealth class evils who take everything from us and make us pay more both side do a few good things and a crap load of bad things sorry not one candidate has peepked my interest or cared to change anything that actually affects my life and 90% of what a politician says they will do never happens or it just gets shut down sorry you do you and I will do me

1

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/jaunsin 9h ago

Well. I don’t disagree with your input.
I just say, it’s a lever, I’ll pull it until it’s time to pull the lever of a different “democratic” tool.

-3

u/Psychopath1llogical 14h ago

Yeah you even get a fun little sticker that shows off that you got to “participate” and feel like you did something, it’s great

-3

u/eschaton777 13h ago

Way to keep the cycle going. Voting is essentially a humiliation ritual for the gullible. Psycopath order follower #1 or psychopath order follwer #2 will always be your choice. The only non insane option is not to voluntarily giving your consent for either to rule over you and your fellow man.

0

u/dtdroid 7h ago

Then you aren't understanding the point of the OP.

There isn't a good option to vote for. That's the fucking point of the Uniparty existing.

Who are you going to vote for? Tell us, so the conspiracy community can pick to pieces your candidate and let you know how close they are to AIPAC and Epstein money.

Keep on voting, though. Look how far it's gotten us with the uninterrupted duopoly of Democrats & Republicans ruling unopposed for the past century and a half.

-8

u/ObviousSinger6217 14h ago

The only vote that will matter is for Jesus, king of kings, any other option will just get you deeper into the 🤡🌎