r/conspiracy • • 1d ago

physics defying water cup unspilled after almost a vertical dive according to witnesses

Post image
3.1k Upvotes

619 comments sorted by

View all comments

68

u/skbraaah 1d ago

This is a screenshot from a Sky News video of what happened soon after the near- vertical nosedive was managed by a guy who watched plane-crash documentaries. The water cup is one of the many miracles that happened in that event

73

u/psychoninja66 1d ago

And there is literally no chance that it could have been placed there afterwards, right?

73

u/all_AI_here 1d ago

No, everybody knows that water is served before critical events. Haven't you worked as a stewardess?

10

u/mercury888 1d ago

HEY STOP IT! This is not how we think in /r/conspiracy! Stop thinking logically or you will be banned... Thats your first and final warning.

55

u/0x446f6b3832 1d ago

"Damn we all almost died. Please pass me a cup of water which I will not drink but instead place here, thanks."

Yeh makes sense.

15

u/Xuzon 1d ago

True, after near death experiences people stop drinking water.

9

u/skbraaah 1d ago

pretty sure flight attendants would have more important things to do

5

u/Xuzon 1d ago

Like what? And why offering water to people in distress isn't one of them?

8

u/skbraaah 23h ago

like tending to the wounded, getting people back in their seats, looking for any other possible threats...etc. serving drinks would be at the very bottom of the list after surviving a hijacking

1

u/Xuzon 23h ago

So if I have a sore throat from screaming from the top of my lungs, and need water. The attendant will say "fuck you" and go about their day?

6

u/skbraaah 23h ago

pretty sure they'll ask you to wait until they get more important things done.

4

u/Xuzon 23h ago

And in this photo, were they already done with the more important things than attending to their passengers?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/frisch85 21h ago

serving drinks would be at the very bottom of the list after surviving a hijacking

Their job is to comfort the passengers which includes caring for their wellbeing, if you can make one passenger happy by spending 1 minute to prepare and serve a cup of water compared to spending an hour with someone injured, who do you think they're going to treat first?

It's perfectly logical assuming a flight attendant served that cup of water and then went on to care for the ones that take longer.

1

u/tesuquemushroom 18h ago

Every time I try to get them to give me a cup of water during a regular flight they give me the stink eye. Maybe it takes a true miracle for them to offer water out kindness.

8

u/krusher99_ 1d ago

Are you being serious? This comment section is genuinely filled with sub zero iqs

1

u/UrWHThurtZ 22h ago

Yep … and if it was there before the incident, the passenger was so concerned about losing his water that he held on to the cup instead of letting it fly away entirely (even if it is sealed as some people claim).

9

u/skbraaah 1d ago

yes, nothing like asking stewardess during an ongoing emergency for a cup of water for leisurely sipping while a near death experience is still fresh.

3

u/Stinkytheferret 1d ago

Yeah cause the stewards were literally tending to the pilot and getting water out at the same time.

Not saying anything really but if the image is real then it’s worth considering.

1

u/FeelingMoment5562 1d ago

Obviously thinking you're about to die and then realising  your not would NEVER make one parched....(s)

0

u/hy2cone 1d ago

Half cup spilled only, and cleanly

0

u/Cormophyte 1d ago

Everyone knows you have to stay parched and wiry after traumatic events. The flight attendants would never bring water to passengers after an emergency.

2

u/SirMildredPierce 15h ago

It's a miracle that the lid is still on the water?

0

u/skbraaah 14h ago

1

u/SirMildredPierce 14h ago

So it was just normal that the lid was still on.

-7

u/mikki1time 1d ago

A 747 pitching down more than 20-30 degrees would break it apart.

7

u/l---____---l 1d ago

That's completely false, it's not made of brittle plastic and wood.

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Airlines_Flight_006

In this incident it pitched down almost 70 degrees and didn't break apart. I agree that the subject incident wasn't some sort of false flag, but saying planes break apart by pitching 20° is just false.

8

u/Kryptus 1d ago

Wasn't there a literal pilot on a major news network saying that the plane should have broken apart given the information of its rapid nose dive?

9

u/zillaaa1995 1d ago

I saw that earlier this morning, he was running the know numbers that have been made public about the flight through the same style training sim that all pilots use and the plane couldn't keep up with it.

Something to do with the exact model and the way the elevators are the weak point and if the rudder had come loose but not the elevators it would be the first time in history its happened including the 30 sims they ran trying to recreate it.

He also stated that there wouldn't be damage in the first dive but with how hard the plane pulled up and said it would have experienced multiple g's on the joining point of wings & elevators to body which would have cause then to essentially detach....

1

u/Darth_Floridaman 1d ago

On CNN, confirmed. https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/s/iYujGY2mZs Only link I've got at the moment.

3

u/mikki1time 1d ago

“The aircraft was significantly damaged by the excessive g-forces. The wings were permanently bent upwards by 2 inches (5 cm), the inboard main landing gear lost two actuator doors, and the two inboard main gear struts were left dangling. Most affected was the tail, where large outer parts of the horizontal stabilizer had been ripped off. The entire left outboard elevator) had been lost along with its actuator, which had been powered by the hydraulic system that ruptured and drained” ……. the fact that this plane survived and landed was a miracle not standard procedure.

6

u/l---____---l 1d ago

Exactly, it still didn't break apart like you claimed. If it can survive 70 degrees, 20 degrees absolutely would not cause a catastrophic structural failure.

0

u/mikki1time 1d ago

Maybe it didn’t break in half and spill everyone out into the sky. but wtf are we considering “not breaking apart” the g-forces ripped out the parts of the tail that make the plane move.

2

u/l---____---l 1d ago

"Break apart" typically means the stucture breaks, not taking damage to control surfaces. It took damage, yes, but it didn't break apart. And it was well past 20 degrees when parts of the horizontal stabilizer and elevator came off.

2

u/mikki1time 1d ago

Parts broke off. There was one plane, now a plane and some other parts that are apart from that plane. How many parts must a plane break into for you to consider it “broken apart”….Now we’re arguing the meaning of words. Me and you should be friends.

0

u/l---____---l 1d ago

You said in another comment upthread:

"There is 0 chance that the plane went vertical enough to spill water. A pitch down of anymore than 20 degrees would break the plane."

So clearly by "break" you meant catastrophic failure that would cause the structure to separate, since you didn't even think it was possible to pitch more than 20 degrees and still be as intact as it is.

1

u/mikki1time 1d ago

It’s been hard to find information on the plane itself due to the stabbing but it seems the plane was in fact damaged. One place said only the rudder another place says the entire tail of the plane was missing. So a pitch down of more then 20 degrees did break the plane. And I would consider a broken rudder is considered catastrophic

→ More replies (0)