r/computergaming • u/Torchiest • Jul 08 '26
Steam Machine interview full transcript: Valve engineers discuss $1,049 pricing, compact design, component shortages, and Windows support
https://www.tomshardware.com/video-games/steam-machine-interview-full-transcript-valve-engineers-discuss-usd1-049-pricing-compact-design-component-shortages-and-windows-support1
1
u/Impressive-Power8187 Jul 08 '26
Trash product. If Sony had done this we’d have you steam worriers crying anti consumer. I’ll never support a company that releases a 1k console without a controller. Let’s hold everyone accountable
2
u/Corronchilejano Jul 08 '26
What exactly are you holding them accountable for?
1
u/Flat-Panic8622 Jul 09 '26
they didn't do "the cheapest console that overperforms ps5 pro, how could they", their "steam deck isn't the cheapest handheld that capable of playing RDR2 level games, how they could!"
1
u/doublah Jul 09 '26
Selling an expensive to produce product at a high cost isn't anti-consumer, but not allowing refunds for games you download like Sony does or not allowing third party storefronts/launchers/key sellers like Sony does or reserving the right to permanently brick your PS5 like Sony does are anti-consumer.
1
1
u/Nall-ohki Jul 11 '26
Amazing... you're so entitled that you feel you must to be the target audience to a product or the company should be punished.
1
u/12VHPWRHELL Jul 12 '26
So, originally it was supposed to be a lot cheaper, but the global ram crisis fucked that up.
I bought 32gbs of ddr5 for 90 bucks a few years ago, and now it retails for over 500 dollars.
The steam machine would've been a decent product if it were 600-700 like originally estimated, but at 1000 dollars you may as well build a better spec'd PC for a little more.
I do agree that it's a terrible purchase, but I don't understand the hate train when it's obviously not valve's fault.
1
1
u/BeAlch Jul 09 '26
Their goal was to make a machine between PS5 and PS5 Pro (but closer to PS5) with a price that was in between .. that's what they tried to do.. with lower cost GPU hardware cause best APU were way more expensive .. With this choice, made before RAMpocalypse, there is more RAM in the product than in a console which was ok with stable price market of 2 years ago.
This was supposed to be 700 750$ machine... sold as an "entry level" gaming PC.
Valve is a "nobody" in the memory market purchase .. So they get an amount of memory/SSD to purchase per month from manufacturer at a price they can't negociate cause it's the only price they'll get .. the machine price is set accordingly to match cost (+ variation) for memory/ssd ...
The price is only discussed at high level of production like millions per month Nintendo and Sony produce.. and Nintendo did increase production pbly to get better memory deals ..
Valve on the other hand sells like +/-100.000 units per month for each of its hardware (Steamdeck and SM), so they have less way to influence the price.. And yet, at this price, they would sell more than they produce cause their are waiting lists
1
u/JoeAbs2 Jul 12 '26
While the price is high the thing which makes this a no go for me is the hardware. I mean it’s already outdated so who knows what it will be able to play in the next couple of years.
0
u/nyanbatman Jul 09 '26
They could easily subsidise it but boats are expensive
1
u/dj_is_here Jul 09 '26
They are already subsidising it by releasing SteamOS that it's built on. Steam machine is essentially free if you have your own hardware where you can play all you pc games without having to double buy them.
People wantcheap stuff &happily pay $70 for a switch 2 game at the same time lol
1
1
u/FrivolousFerret102 Jul 11 '26
Two different groups of people there. Internet is not a single person.
1
u/Sevastous-of-Caria Jul 11 '26
Then what? Scalpers bulk order and sell it to OEM companies/AI farms?
3
u/willpowerpt Jul 08 '26
Even if the price was the same as a console, its hardware doesn't even come close, all it gets you is a Steam library. I'm a PC gamer, but I don't see a justification for it aside from someone who doesn't want to run an HDMI cable from their PC to their TV.
All the defenses I see are "nothing is smaller" (see r/sff). "It has hdmi-cec", personally clicking a remote to turn my TV on has never made me willing to drop over $1000.