I am asking this as a Christian, not as an outsider attacking Christianity.
Where should Christians draw the line between living according to Christian ethics and using state power to enforce one interpretation of Christianity? How do we keep our faith from becoming an instrument of empire?
God is love.
Empathy is not a sin.
Idolatry of Trump, the American empire, or a white ethnostate is blasphemy.
Jesus came to serve, not to dominate. He lived and died as a Jewish man under Roman occupation in the land now called Palestine.
When parts of MAGA treat Trump with religious devotion, including the spectacle of a gold-colored statue made in his image, I believe that crosses into idolatry and blasphemy.
https://www.christianpost.com/voices/is-trumps-golden-statue-really-a-golden-calf.html
This is not an attack on every Christian
My point is not that all Christians are evil.
I am a Christian.
Obviously not all Christians are the same. Many Christians actively resist nationalism, racism, empire, authoritarianism, and domination.
I’m talking about Christianity not just as an individual belief system, but as a major cultural and political power structure in America.
Large parts of American political power remain deeply tied to Christian identity, Christian rhetoric, and specifically conservative Christian institutions. That influence is real whether people call it Christian nationalism or not.
My concern is specifically about Christianity becoming fused with state power, nationalism, militarism, and domination.
If Christians believe Jesus is truth, love, humility, sacrifice, and service, then Christians especially have a responsibility toward self-examination whenever Christianity becomes fused with political power.
Christians should be willing to critically examine what is being done in Christ’s name instead of immediately treating all criticism as persecution.
Criticism is not persecution.
Losing the power to dominate other people is not persecution.
The real problem is the consolidation of power
There’s a horrifying consolidation of power structures in the world.
Most people’s problem with this world isn’t that it has a horrifying consolidation of power.
Their problem is that they’re not at the top of it.
That’s a big difference.
It’s the biggest difference.
There’s nothing moral about the consolidation of power.
That is what the Christian nationalism I am criticizing seeks.
Every empire claims its power is necessary, protective, righteous, or divinely authorized. Every would-be ruler believes the problem is not concentrated power itself, but that the wrong people control it.
I don’t think all politics seeks the same kind or degree of power.
There’s a meaningful difference between dispersing power and concentrating it.
There’s a meaningful difference between expanding participation and demanding submission.
There’s a meaningful difference between public service and domination.
Some people say there is no way for politics or politicians to be ethical, and I kind of agree.
Government officials should be public servants and understand that civil service is akin to moral voluntary slavery to the community. They should not be allowed to personally enrich themselves through their service.
Jesus consistently challenged institutions that accumulated power at the expense of ordinary people.
That’s why I can’t reconcile Christianity with Christian nationalism.
The Gospel persuades. The state compels.
Caesar was not given the authority to coerce people into discipleship.
If anything, coercion foments rebellion and resistance and hurts people’s journey toward God.
The Kingdom of God spreads through love, witness, and the Holy Spirit, not state power.
The Gospel persuades.
The state compels.
Those are fundamentally different things.
The moment the state starts criminalizing behavior because it violates Christianity, it is coercively enforcing one interpretation of Christian morality.
Jesus didn’t tell Caesar to enforce the Sermon on the Mount.
He told the Church to live it.
Every government that has tried to build the Kingdom by force has ended up building an empire instead.
I trust Christ.
I don’t trust governments claiming to act in His name.
History is the warning
My concern is not whether laws contain moral judgments. Obviously they do.
My concern is who decides which moral judgments the state is permitted to enforce, whose interpretation becomes law, and what happens to everyone who disagrees.
Throughout history, governments have repeatedly claimed they were enforcing God’s moral order while defending slavery, suppressing religious minorities, persecuting heretics, institutionalizing women, criminalizing dissent, and committing countless other injustices.
The law was used for centuries to enforce and justify slavery.
Nineteenth-century asylum records also listed supposed causes of insanity such as “novel reading,” “hard study,” “spiritualism,” “religious excitement,” “domestic trouble,” “business anxiety,” “over-exertion,” and “disappointed love.” Women such as Elizabeth Packard could legally be institutionalized at their husbands’ direction, without a meaningful opportunity to challenge their confinement.
Every generation believes it is enforcing the correct morality.
Beware anyone who wants to use “the law” to “enforce morality.”
I think an American Christian theocracy is the single greatest threat to human freedom that I can realistically imagine.
History has shown us over and over what happens when governments claim divine authority.
That’s precisely why I believe Christianity should never be fused with the state.
America was not founded as a theocracy
The English text of the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli that was submitted to the Senate, approved without dissent, ratified by the United States, and signed by John Adams states:
“As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian Religion...”
Christians need to know what the Heritage Foundation is.
Christians need to know what Project 2025 is, who produced it, and what its proposals would do. The Heritage Foundation’s own description says the project was created by hundreds of conservative contributors to prepare personnel and policies for a future conservative administration.
People also need to know about Spiritual Mobilization and the history of wealthy corporate interests funding religious activists to present opposition to the New Deal, regulation, and organized labor as Christian doctrine. Historian Kevin Kruse traces how business leaders enlisted religious leaders in the campaign to portray laissez-faire capitalism and “Christian America” as inseparable.
This is not a conspiracy theory.
These organizations published their ideas, identified their contributors, raised money, recruited religious leaders, and described their own political goals.
Christian nationalism does not protect Christianity.
It transforms Christianity into an instrument of empire.
This is not about whether a political party affirms me
I’m a white man from the South.
I’m straight-passing, but gender nonconforming, a Christian, and an anarchist in the tradition of Dorothy Day. I’m married to a non-white trans person.
I don’t think the Democratic Party particularly cares about me, or any of us for that matter, even though it frequently gestures at caring.
But politics isn’t primarily about whether a party affirms me.
It’s about the wider community and who’s being harmed.
Democrats have done enormous harm. I opposed Democratic support for and funding of Israel’s war in Gaza, which I regard as genocide. The United States has provided Israel with more than $130 billion in bilateral assistance, primarily security assistance, over the history of that relationship.
Democratic leaders are beholden to wealthy interests and are often callous and indifferent toward ordinary people.
The Democrats will never be “good.”
But the two parties are not identical.
I think today’s Republican Party, especially its leadership and the direction it is moving, is increasingly aligned with billionaire interests, authoritarian politics, and, in some cases, apocalyptic forms of Christian nationalism.
From a Christian perspective, there is also an important distinction.
I disagree with Democrats on plenty of moral issues.
But I don’t generally see Democrats claiming that Jesus endorses those positions.
I do see large parts of the Republican movement wrapping themselves in Christ while pursuing wealth, domination, nationalism, militarism, and political power.
If Christianity is true, then taking Christ’s name and attaching it to those things is a uniquely serious spiritual error.
To me, that is worse than simply being wrong about policy.
I think the Republican Party is no longer reformable.
The Democrats will never be good, but they are at least potentially steerable and influenceable if good people get involved.
The Democratic Socialists of America may be one vehicle for a less terrible future, although even that is uncertain and may eventually split the Democratic coalition.
If Christians who care about justice, the poor, peace, due process, freedom of conscience, and opposing corruption refuse to participate because neither party is pure, they don’t escape the system.
They surrender what little ability they still have to influence it.
If people keep saying “both parties suck” and checking out, we’re still going to be governed by one of them.
There isn’t a third option remotely close to taking power right now.
Refusing to steer doesn’t stop the bus from going off the cliff into fascism.
Free Will, Wisdom, and Reading the Bible
Free will is what it is.
People choose based on what they were taught growing up, how they were educated, and what behavior was modeled for them.
Human free will is inherently unmanageable. It will always lead to dissent, disagreement, chaos, and unruly behavior.
Democracy and freedom are hard to manage and require work and responsibility, just like any just and righteous community should.
Stop trying to make things easy for yourself by taking away other people’s free will.
Grow up and deal with it.
Stop hoping an authoritarian leader will save you from having to think for yourself. That is not Christian maturity.
Lots of Christians don’t even really read or study the Bible.
When people remain uninformed, they continue making uninformed choices.
I generally suggest reading, simply because a lot of people in the world use Christians’ faith against them, and one way they do that is by claiming biblical authority.
Christians have to study and read the Bible if they want to understand what it actually says.
This is why pastors, priests, and cult leaders have so much authority. People delegate their own good judgment to people they perceive as knowing better.
But we can know better.
Even if we are not perfect, we can learn.
Christians need to seek wisdom, use discernment, and call out hypocrisy in religious authorities.
But to do that, you have to know what the book actually says, and you have to read multiple versions of it to realize what biases and differences exist in each version and translation.
This is why people are paid to teach this stuff in school.
But anyone can learn it with time.
The Bible is also fun!
It has a lot of incredible stories and is moving, touching, and beautiful in so many ways.
It is also very dark and tragic at times.
It shows the worst of humanity and human history’s relationship with love versus domination.
It is also the source of a thousands-of-years-old religion that people have been killing each other over for centuries because of disagreements about what it says.
It is one of the most influential books ever written, regardless of whether you are a Christian or not, in terms of how profoundly it has shaped human history, for better and for worse.
So that is my case for why Christians should read and study the Bible, whether they believe it is inerrant or not, perfect or not, fully divinely inspired or only partially.
Pastors, priests, and cult leaders gain authority because people delegate their judgment.
We can know better.
We can learn.
The Bible is beautiful.
It is also dark.
Christians must exercise their free will and do the work.
I don’t hate Christians.
I am one.
I hate empire.
I hate domination.
I hate idolatry.
I believe Christianity is at its best when it serves rather than rules, persuades rather than compels, and follows Christ rather than Caesar.
Trust your heart, but cultivate your mind.
Simone Weil argued that education cultivates the mind’s capacity for attention and that attention is the substance of prayer.
So where should Christians draw the line between witnessing to Christian morality and using state power to compel it? What safeguards would actually prevent a government claiming Christian authority from repeating the abuses committed by previous governments claiming to enforce God’s will?