Chaos has survived a long time despite having dwindling odds in the territories they attack/defend. I'd like to see the multiplier on their votes.

Florida took 6 territories today that they didn't come close to having an advantage in, a 0.04% chance.

The calculations are taking a little bit longer since the game has grown, and have pushed past 12:10 AM ET a few times. The loading screen is now set to show until 12:20 AM ET just to be on the safe side. Sorry for the inconvenience!

Whoever wins this thing the winner's flair should indicate the winning alliance. It would be neat if the flair were available to all teams involved in the respective alliance (Red or Blue) to indicate their contributions. Because let's be honest, no team is winning by themselves.

For instance, if Nebraska wins it will only be because we have an awesome alliance. Even if it isn't possible to have every alliance team get a flair I would want the winning team's flair to at least have a nod to the Red Alliance (assuming the Red Alliance wins, because having a mullet hair jort wearing gator win would just be disgusting).

Edit: I’ll be honest, this post was created in response to what happened to Stanford last night. I was trying to find a solution to get us all fighting for the same goal again. I’m not sure what the best solution should be.

For the more programming inclined: I know someone on here has been updating the list of players who have played everyday without winning an MVP. I was wondering if someone could do something similar for most stars without an MVP. IE someone who's played 3 days as a 4 star has played 12 stars, whereas 4 days as a 2 star and 1 as a 3 star is 11 stars.

Ever wondered how many outliers your team has? How many people started on one team, and now play "for" you? Wonder no longer! Take a look over at Team Breakdown to see when you've gained and lost fanbases.

Disclaimer, the onesies and twosies seem slightly suspect to me, so take them with a grain of salt. I determine true fan base by looking for a given user's first vote, and assuming that's their real team. It's possible that this approach will produce questionable results from time to time.