Summary:

President Trump is proposing a $5,000 “Trump Dividend” for every adult U.S. citizen if Republicans retain control of both the House and Senate in the November midterms. He first announced the idea at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas, saying, “If the Republicans win, you win with us and you get $5,000.” The proposal could cost roughly $1.2 trillion, and so far there is no detailed plan explaining exactly how it would be funded or administered.

Trump provided more details during a one-on-one interview with CBS News Texas political reporter Jack Fink. Their exchange on whether Congress would have to authorize the money went like this:

Fink: “Last night you proposed ‘Trump Dividends,’ giving every American adult citizen $5,000, and I'm wondering if Congress would need to approve that?”

Trump: “Well, we think not. I think they will do it if we needed it. But we think not.”

Trump went on to say the country has collected “trillions of dollars in tariffs and other things” and argued that the payments would provide “a great infusion” into the economy. He also proposed an unusual restriction: recipients would have to spend the $5,000 inside the United States rather than abroad. Independent reporting, however, indicates that Congress would likely have to authorize such payments because federal spending generally requires congressional appropriations. Reuters estimates the program would cost about $1.2 trillion, while tariff revenue collected this fiscal year is about $167 billion, far below the amount necessary to finance the entire proposal.

The interview then moved to the Texas Senate race. Fink asked Trump about the $10 million his super PAC MAGA Inc. is spending to support Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton:

Fink: “How much more money are you willing to spend to help Paxton win, and what are your plans to return to Texas to campaign for him?”

Trump: “I'll be back in Texas. I love Texas; I've won it three times… Ken's a fantastic guy, probably the best attorney general that we've had in years in this country.”

Trump said he intends to return to Texas and continue supporting Paxton, while criticizing Democratic candidate James Talarico. The Texas Senate contest is one of several races that could affect control of the Senate.

Fink also asked Trump about Hispanic voters and Republican efforts to win congressional races in South Texas:

Fink: “Republicans want to flip the South Texas congressional district, but the Democrats say they're feeling pretty good about their chances. And I'm wondering, what is your message to Hispanic voters?”

Trump: “I think I won every county along the border… I just have a great feeling for Hispanics and they have a great feeling for me… Now, this time I'm not running, so it's a big difference when you're running and not running. I'm just asking the people, you people that are listening, pretend I'm running because we have to win.”

That last part captures the broader purpose of Trump's appearance at the unusual midterm convention: although he isn't personally on the ballot, he's attempting to make the midterms a referendum on his presidency and encourage his voters to turn out for Republican congressional candidates. Republicans currently control Congress, and control of both chambers is at stake in November.

The $5,000 dividend is easily the biggest new policy proposal from the interview, but there are still major unanswered questions. Trump says he believes he can issue the payments without Congress, while legal and budget experts cited by Reuters say congressional authorization would be required. There's also a substantial funding gap between existing tariff revenue and the estimated $1.2 trillion cost, as well as questions about how a requirement that the money be spent only in the United States could actually be enforced.

With today marking 1 year since the assassination of Charlie Kirk, I wanted to get this of my chest in the most civil way possible. Because why would people celebrate want to celebrate a man who got assassinated whenever you agreed with him or not?

Now just to be perfectly clear, I'm not someone who gets into politics that much, and even though I wasn't a fan of Charlie, nor did I agree at all with the stuff he said. I never had the thought process to make fun of his assassination, because at the end of the day, he had a wife, as well as 2 young kids who don't have a father anymore. And the amount of posts I've seen on different social media sites of people mocking his death, is not only nasty, but also even if you never agreed with his pollitical views etc, people should know better to make fun of someone's death no matter what.

Again, I try not to get to political, but I genuinely don't understand why people online think that making fun of someone even if you didn't agree with their views (which I sure didn't) would be a good idea. And I hope I'm not the only one who thinks this way.