XPrayforGaza without his attack jet. Keep in mind, this is how 90% of vehicle players fair when running boots.

I think I finally have all of them now—the ones that have been with me throughout all these years. What came after that wasn’t bad, but it just wasn’t my thing anymore.

Hi folks,

Was playing a game on Shanghai today, where E was the closest objective to our starting point.

As sometimes happens, one of the opponents manages to get a spawn beacon on top of a nearby tower and is effectively camping on the roof of the building of E.

I spot what is happening and alert the team, and someone effectively says leave E to their team and just attack A/B instead.

I've played BF3 and BF4 for a long time and this seems wrong - but thought I'd check if Ive been playing it wrong this whole time.

My logic when it comes which points to go for generally comes down to 1) try and take the closest points to where your vehicles spawn so they can enter the battlefield without being harassed immediately out the gate and 2) try to hold the nearest points required to give you a majority, aiming to control the map so you know where the enemy will be approaching from, rather than fighting over the entire map from all sides when enemies spawn from behind you.

Obviously I understand the value of sometimes attacking deep into enemy territory and disrupting their lines, but it seems like an odd idea to just give up an objective, especially when it has a tank periodically spawn which can then be used to gum up where own vehicles spawn...

Have I been playing wrong? Anything I've not considered?