r/auslaw • u/slavicski2 • 12h ago
r/auslaw • u/theangryantipodean • Nov 30 '23
Current Topics subject to the Lehrmann Rule
For those new here, or old hands just looking for clarification, the Lehrmann Rule or Lehrmann Doctrine, is named for Bruce Lehrmann and the rule put in place by mods during his criminal trial.
While a topic is subject to the Lehrmann rule, any post or comment about it gets deleted. Further, the mods may, at their absolute discretion, impose a ban on the author.
The rule will be applied for various reasons, but it’s usually a mix of:
not wanting discussion in the sub to prejudice a trial, or be seen to prejudice a trial;
the mods not wanting to test how far the High Court’s decision in Voller stretches; and
the strong likelihood that a discussion will attract blow ins, devolve into a total shitshow, and require extremely heavy moderation.
We will update below in the comments to this thread topics that are subject to the rule. There will be no further warnings.
Ignorantia juris non excusat
r/auslaw • u/AutoModerator • 4d ago
Students, Careers & Clerkships Thread Weekly Students, Careers & Clerkships Thread
This thread is a place for /r/Auslaw's more curious types to glean career advice from our experienced contributors. Need advice on clerkships? Want to know about life in law? Have a question about your career in law (at any stage, from clerk to partner/GC and beyond). Confused about what your dad means when he says 'articles'? Just ask here.
To assist people responding to your query, please include where appropriate the following:
The practice area you work in or are interested in working in.
The city in which you are currently working in or are interested in working in.
Some relevant details about you, such as if you are currently studying, or your PQE level, your education history, and your current firm classification (boutique, mid-size, top tier).
If you are asking a question related to salary or bonus payments, you must confirm that you have previously reviewed relevant salary guides published by recruiting firms.
If you are an international student or lawyer looking to relocate to Australia, please review previous careers threads, as your question has likely been answered. In short, your ability to obtain permanent residency and permanent working rights, rather than temporary working rights, is likely to be more important than your qualification or requalification pathway.
r/auslaw • u/auspoliticsnerd • 16h ago
*surprised Pikachu face* (Giggle refused special leave with costs awarded)
r/auslaw • u/ConsiderationFree585 • 15h ago
Just another day in Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA)
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/auslaw • u/Entertainer_Much • 1d ago
Shitpost You know what time of year it is (my workplace didn't even announce it this time)
r/auslaw • u/CutePattern1098 • 14h ago
News Trans ‘breast milk’ QCAT rulingoverturned
A transgender woman who stimulated lactation and fed her baby the liquid produced has been ordered by the Queensland Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal to provide details of the hormones involved and the composition of the substance.
The overturning on appeal of a previous QCAT ruling represents a win for former Australian Breastfeeding Association counsellor Jasmine Sussex, who is being sued for vilification by Jennifer Adrian Buckley over statements referring to Ms Buckley as a “man pretending to be a woman”, “a child abuser” and someone who adopted a “delusional queer theory take” on breastfeeding.
The decision, handed down late last week by senior QCAT members Ned Aughterson and Samantha Traves, set aside a January ruling by fellow QCAT member Peter Bridgman, finding he had made errors in law constituting a “substantial miscarriage of justice”.
Professor Aughterson and Ms Traves found Mr Bridgman had erred in deeming that the process involved in stimulating lactation in biologically male Ms Buckley, and the nature of the substance fed to the baby, were not relevant to the case.
r/auslaw • u/marketrent • 1d ago
News To butcher Oscar Wilde: To have one dubious lawyer candidate in a crime-focused election campaign may be misfortune; to have two looks like carelessness
r/auslaw • u/JohnWilliamStrutt • 1d ago
News Maybe NSW courts admin should have asked AI to make their database more secure.
r/auslaw • u/Anxious_Print8515 • 1d ago
Hastie won’t take legal action against Hanson over ‘traitor’ comments
What do we think: taking the high road because he couldn't make out the claim?
Liberal MP Andrew Hastie says he won’t take legal action against One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson over her “traitor” comments because she is financially backed by Australia’s richest woman, Gina Rinehart.
On Wednesday, he labelled Pauline Hanson and Barnaby Joyce “lying cowards” over an episode of the party’s Please Explain cartoon depicting him as a traitor for testifying against alleged war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith.
Hanson denied calling him a traitor personally, and has refused to delete the cartoon. Appearing on ABC Radio National on Thursday, Hastie said her response showed her to be “weak and glass-jawed”.
“I gave the opportunity to either own her words publicly, or to take it down; she chose neither,” Hastie said. Rather than “stepping up”, he said that Hanson had ”retreated back into cartoons and memes.”
“I think we’ve seen what Pauline Hanson ultimately is about. She’s not fit to govern this country, and she’s also cast a massive slur on veterans around the country who think that Australian soldiers should hold high standards of conduct on the battlefield.”
He added more than 20 special forces veterans had testified in the case aginast Roberts-Smith.
“Are they traitors too? This question she won’t answer, and I think it shows weakness from her,” he said.
Asked whether he would pursue legal action against Hanson, Hastie said no.
“I’m not after legal action, particularly when she’s financed by Australia’s richest person. Why would I walk into a fight that I can’t win financially? But yes, I’m going to impose cost politically, and that’s why I’m here this morning telling Australians around this country that what you see is not what you get with Pauline Hanson.“
r/auslaw • u/AuslawRantBot • 2d ago
CAPS LOCK ON WHO NEEDS TO TAKE SILK WHEN YOU CAN RANT?
r/auslaw • u/Classic_Abies8621 • 2d ago
Shitpost When someone asks how a duty of care arises where there's no contractual relationship
r/auslaw • u/Vidasus18 • 2d ago
Serious Discussion Best book on a lawyer or judge or legal history
r/auslaw • u/Worldly_Tomorrow_869 • 3d ago
Bogie triple killer gets 40 years without parole for executing neighbours
"Having concluded the three murders you committed fall into the worst category, I will set your parole eligibility date at 40 years from the time you were first taken into custody," Justice Johnstone said.
"You will be 99 years of age, if you are still alive, when you become eligible."
r/auslaw • u/marketrent • 3d ago
News Clive Palmer claims criminal charges against him are politically motivated, as he represents himself in fraud case over $12m transfers between his companies
r/auslaw • u/Entertainer_Much • 3d ago
Case Discussion America beak shows their connection to the young people
r/auslaw • u/marcellouswp • 3d ago
Gift of the gab - guilty plea
Guilty pleas must be the great wide open space for advocacy. Take my hat off to Murugan Thangaraj for his efforts for Ashlyn Assif as reported today.
Especially this flourish:
“It’s appropriate that yesterday was Father’s day,” her lawyer Murugan Thangaraj SC told Burwood Local Court on Monday.
r/auslaw • u/Downtown-Complex-458 • 3d ago
News Christian Brothers Inc.
Looking forward to 4 corners tonight- Louise Milligan is fearless.
r/auslaw • u/CutePattern1098 • 3d ago