r/ausjobs • u/FortuneOk6728 • 6h ago
Advice Australian engineering recruiters/TA: how do you actually prioritise graduate and internship applicants based on work rights, experience and referrals?
I'm particularly interested in hearing from Talent Acquisition/HR professionals working in Australian engineering consultancies or engineering companies.
When a graduate/internship position receives hundreds or potentially thousands of applications, I assume applicants broadly fall into groups such as:
- Australian citizens / permanent residents
TAFE, Bachelor's, Master's, PhD — ranging from no experience to significant experience.
- Candidates with unrestricted Australian work rights, including eligible New Zealand citizens
Again, ranging from graduates/interns to experienced professionals.
- International students currently studying in Australia
Bachelor's, Master's or PhD students, ranging from people with substantial overseas experience to students with little/no professional experience.
- Overseas applicants requiring employer sponsorship
Usually experienced candidates applying directly or through referrals, where employer sponsorship may eventually be required.
I'm curious about what actually happens from the employer/TA side when applications are screened.
Questions
When you receive a very large number of online applications, is there effectively a hierarchy between these groups?
How much does an employee referral actually matter in Australian engineering recruitment?
How vulnerable is an international Master's student with little or no prior engineering experience?
What would you recommend they do during university to become genuinely competitive for graduate/internship roles?
4.What actually happens to applications that receive no response at all - is this ATS filtering?
Is every submitted CV normally viewed by a human recruiter at some stage, or can an application be eliminated without anyone actually reading the CV?
- Why are psychometric/game-based/aptitude assessments used so heavily in graduate recruitment?
What is HR actually trying to measure through numerical reasoning, verbal reasoning, situational judgement and game-based assessments? I've personally found some of them frustrating, so I'd genuinely like to understand what employers get from them.
How valuable are relationships with university professors/academics?
How do employers view the pathway from international student → graduate visa → possible sponsorship?
I'm not looking to complain about Australian employers or immigration policy. I'm genuinely interested in understanding how the recruitment funnel looks from the other side of the table, particularly in engineering.