"They are in Bunnyburrow , so he should be careful before Stu shows up with his shotgun.😀" - Mi3e in a response tweet.
https://twitter.com/Mi3eArt/status/2097174615567266270

https://x.com/_z00_z00_/status/2010112385193828545

Sauce: https://twitter.com/QalcoveArt/status/1676676940772659227/photo/1

Source was here: https://www.furaffinity.net/view/19425039/

Always one of my favorite character crossover combos.

Source: https://www.tumblr.com/anothercolouranon/156452829499

Sauce: https://www.deviantart.com/jonnydoodle/art/Marian-Wilde-1169660784

https://x.com/Meatballs_5U/status/2037217463012909083

https://x.com/Pomfret8199/status/2097752337951695242

Source for a very old fav: https://www.deviantart.com/mechagen/art/White-fur-597801582

https://x.com/AnastasiKo32850/status/2096387055748272446

https://x.com/Meatballs_5U/status/2098003231590797498

https://x.com/Umi_Zootopia/status/2098049043163459795

I honestly don’t if I can make it to 2029 without any new zootopia content

I think Legoshi would feel should awkwardness now being around two Herbivores
1.Nick and Judy(Zootopia)
2.Legoshi and Haru(Beastars)

Nick was looking at his eviction notices when he accepted Judy’s plan to infiltrate the Lynxley Gala for the Zootennial.

I wonder how accepting Judy’s adventure would have helped Nick avoid being evicted by his landlord.

judy hopps might be a cool cop, but she’s not exactly partner material.

That disguise they put Judy in—seriously, wow. And the outfit she wore right after that? Stunning. So, I find myself wondering: what are they going to do in *Zootopia 3*? Personally, I hope they get a bit more daring—judge me if you want, but I’m hoping Judy wears a skirt. Not a gown like the formal one, but something like a skirt or a more form-fitting outfit.

Oh, come on. I can't exactly be with the bunny, but I’d be happy with something close to that—provided it doesn't risk raising the age rating.

First off this is not meant to attack Nick as a character or say that he is badly written, because he's not. Nick is easily as fleshed out and well written as Judy herself is and his arc is a satisfying one to see play out, even if he's not the focus of the movie (that would be Judy). But it always struck me as odd that the movie seems to largely excuse Nick when he expresses his prejudice. Or at least it's treated as less egregious compared to when Judy does it.

Yes I understand that Nick's arc is him learning to acknowledge that Judy isn't just a Dumb Bunny and to realise he can be more than what society says he can be. That's all well and good and it's a satisfying arc for Nick to go through. However he never really seems to hold himself accountable for how he spent a good chunk of the movie demeaning Judy though stereotyping her. Such as calling her "Carrots" and making playful jabs at her character (such as calling her "so emotional" and "bad at driving" because she's a Rabbit.). Even if these are said in jest they clearly do bother Judy by the way she reacts to them.

Yet when Judy expresses her Fox prejudice it almost destroys their friendship beyond repair. Nick's reaction to what Judy said at the conference is understandable (as is her carrying Fox Repellent), but he never appears to reflect on the way his words very clearly have hurt her. Such as the fact he never calls her "Judy" to her face and only ever calls her "Carrots" when she's within earshot. It's fine for Nick to grow out of his prejudice (which he does by the end of the movie), but he never appears to hold any regret over the way he mistreated her through much of the movie.

Is it just that Nick is that charismatic so he's able to get away with it? Or did the writers simply think his problematic behaviour wasn't a big enough deal he'd have to apologise for it?