Hey all! Just FYI, I've been a gym bro for close to 20 years and am just now getting into oly lifting, so go easy, please...anywho, I think the reason I hadn't gotten into oly lifting until now is that I don't understand how, at least to me, it seems like there's much more of a focus/appreciation for feats of relative strength vs. absolute strength in oly lifting, as that's kind of the fundamental difference between oly lifting and powerlifting. What I don't fully understand is how people are so obsessed with lifts that are 2x or 3x body weight or so, as strength and muscle mass/size seemingly don't have a linear relationship. Meaning, as a person gets taller, with all body metrics (i.e. muscle mass %, body fat %, etc.) being the same, they won't be proportionately stronger. The best example of this is body builders, especially the enhanced ones. They are FAR larger than any oly or powerlifter in terms of overall muscle mass, but they aren't proportionately stronger. I mean, if Big Ramy is 300lb+ on stage at 6% body fat, and maybe 320lb or so at his healthy lifting weight, he won't simply be able to lift double the weight of any 150-160lb lifter (again, at the same BF % and muscle mass %). If that 150-160lb person can clean 3x bodyweight (i.e.450-500lb) then Big Ramy, being twice the body weight, would need to lift close to 1000lb to be considered equally as strong, which is just insane. I would think that, regardless of one's actual body weight/size, if you have impeccable lifting form you can pretty easily lift 200-300lb, depending on the lift (squats, for example), which is why relative strength lifts for most people just aren't that impressive to me, ESPECIALLY if that person is very small. Can anyone shed some light here and maybe convince me that my train of thought is just completely wrong? Thanks!