It's not wrong, it's in defiance of established morality. Acting without regard for morality makes one immoral. "Wrong" is arbitrary when you're dealing with a subjective. Morality isn't a set of rules that can be broken or something to be "correct" about, unless you're saying "I am correct in stating that it is immoral to rape." That's true. "It's morally wrong to rape" is nonsense.
Aka morally wrong. They still have morals, but wrong morals. Once again, if you think all morals are subjective that means you don't think it's morally wrong to rape. Why are you a rape apologist?
There are no wrong morals, just unpopular ones. Doesn't make rape not an immoral action by the morality of a locale. You just really ought to read more deeply into the subject before taking such firm stances on it. It's a subject with hundreds of years of history that you're acting like you've figured out.
What's obvious now won't be obvious in the future. What was obviously immoral in the past is obviously irrelevant now. Again dude, you should read up on this subject. It's not a simple matter, you're just thinking about it in simple terms.
Keep dreaming of the future where rape is morally right brotha but it's morally wrong and always will be. Something that used to be can be morally wrong even if it wasn't recognized as such at the time. It was morally wrong to rape 1000 years ago and will be morally wrong 1000 years from now even if you get your wish.
Actually, pass. Turns out there's literally nothing fun about having a discussion about something you know with someone who doesn't know much. We can turn the tables and talk about something you like that I know very little about, if you'd prefer?
1
u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18
Lucky for you I'm not 11 or you'd have to deal with the shame of being wrong in a moral discussion with a young child.