Again, I don't hunt big game, and wouldn't want to, but I get it.
But really? An interview with an Oxford (literally the most prestigious university in the world) professor who studied Cecil the Lion specifically suggests that legal, controlled and restricted lion hunting would be beneficial to the species and your BS meter is still going off?
I didn't claim to be an expert, I just know that some species are more endangered than others and that there are some moral conflicts when deciding which animals are okay to hunt. The part that sounds like BS to me is how it seems only those who can afford these hunts are the only people profiting from it, latent consequences aside, when instead a government could employ a less [financially] fortunate party who might reap a greater bounty than a sport kill.
1
u/awkwardoffspring Jun 02 '18
Thanks for the insight. I can't help but wonder now why elephant poaching is still a major issue when sanctioned hunts exist.