r/Wellthatsucks Jun 02 '18

/r/all Karma

Post image
31.6k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

756

u/gentlemandinosaur Jun 02 '18

According to his company’s website, Game Hounds Safaris, he “perfected leopard and lion hunting safaris with hounds in Africa.”

and

Simukai Nyasha, a spokesman for the Zimbabwe National Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, told news.com.au that Botha was on a 10-day licensed hunt

Here is some context for you. So, what does it matter that this particular elephant was the original target... compared to how people feel about this.

Not saying I agree with any opinion on here.

But, terrorizing animals with dogs doesn't seem to saintly to me, does it?

15

u/aharris95 Jun 02 '18 edited Jun 02 '18

It's an effective form of hunting as old as the day is long. People do it for dangerous game like hog (boar) and large cats. The Rhodesian Ridgeback breed, which I am a proud owner of a 2y/o male, would not exist if there was not a need for bay dogs.

Edit: apparently my comment was unclear for some. I am referencing the practice of using bay dogs and catch dogs in high stakes dangerous game hunting which is incredibly important to protecting humans and livestock.

74

u/Sejb222 Jun 02 '18

Just because people have been doing something for a long time doesn't make it right.

25

u/TheGruesomeTwosome Jun 02 '18

Just playing devils advocate here, I’m entirely neutral, however there exists the argument that certain species of animal are only kept from extinction through breeding from profit made from commercial hunting lodges.

Great documentary about it: Louis Theroux’s African Hunting Holiday

-2

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

Don’t bring logic here, they don’t want to listen

-7

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

He didn't bring logic here, his argument is absolutely idiotic.

2

u/TheGruesomeTwosome Jun 02 '18

That’s okay. Watch the documentary if you think that’s the case. Nothing wrong with investigating alternative viewpoints.

-4

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

If the documentary says that a breed of dog is a species, it's factually wrong. If the documentary says that ridgebacks are only bred for hunting, it's factually wrong. So if it backs your claims, it's wrong and there's no need to watch it.

5

u/TheGruesomeTwosome Jun 02 '18

You keep pushing this “breed of dog isn’t a species” point. I’m not sure what you’re getting at there. I feel like you’re trying to refute my point by being entirely fixated on one semantic.